mr. t. mr. duffey anything further. commissioners, if you don't have questions the matter is submitted >> dollars one question we can't ask what did the arts commission do this to this. >> because they're not here and because of their role this is a group that is looking at the public art of the city but they're the designer of all public works and if i don't do what they say you don't get approval. >> that's where the funding source is what do you mean? >> they took a part of a sentence they all public works requires people for design of the building. >> okay. >> commissioners my concern is this was you want to talk about the arts commission also. >> mr. t would like to. >> all right. >> no disrespect to that point to clarify again, the art commission last month was contingent on your action as well. it was not absolutely so the approval the design was contingent on your action. okay. thank you >> did they push the modern design? the arts commission? >> i would defer to my colleague here. >> thank you. i'm sorry commissioner honda >> no, no i'm hearing both sides. it appears it was this has been poorly planned and managed and executed. if this was a standards permit holder that came and said oh, i took off the part that made it historic the city needs to be accountability to the same standard we hold our homeowners and public to. they've taken off the standards and removed part of the floout that led abatement requires a jack hammer that's a more of a finesse thing it was potentially done to fine this demolition of this project. and so that's my concern >> i without knowing the entire process for the people involved i personally woul