mr. teague. >> corey teague with the planning department great to be here we're also excited about this program working hard together on it i'm going to talk about how it will work how individual projects will be subject to and used in the tdm program the first is the structure of program it is unique in the sense the item before you is an ordinance that amended the planning code to create the tdm program and the requirements and create that structure within the code, however, there are 3 odd important documents that are very important to the program the first are the tdm standards which are adopted by the planning commission 2, 3, 4 august of this year the appendix is includes the tdm measures in details they may use in the tomato plan and a tdm clarification documents as carli mentioned a data driven program so we wanted to have a document that really put in writing all the data we use and these methodology that we use to develop the system she mentioned that tdm is a very dynamic field we using proven measures to the tdm standards are able to be updated more nimbly to reflect the current res

mr. teague. >> corey teague with the planning department great to be here we're also excited about this program working hard together on it i'm going to talk about how it will work how individual projects will be subject to and used in the tdm program the first is the structure of program it is unique in the sense the item before you is an ordinance that amended the planning code to create the tdm program and the requirements and create that structure within the code, however, there are 3 odd important documents that are very important to the program the first are the tdm standards which are adopted by the planning commission 2, 3, 4 august of this year the appendix is includes the tdm measures in details they may use in the tomato plan and a tdm clarification documents as carli mentioned a data driven program so we wanted to have a document that really put in writing all the data we use and these methodology that we use to develop the system she mentioned that tdm is a very dynamic field we using proven measures to the tdm standards are able to be updated more nimbly to reflect the current res

mr. teague. >> corey teague with the planning department great to be here we're also excited about this program working hard together on it i'm going to talk about how it will work how individual projects will be subject to and used in the tdm program the first is the structure of program it is unique in the sense the item before you is an ordinance that amended the planning code to create the tdm program and the requirements and create that structure within the code, however, there are 3 odd important documents that are very important to the program the first are the tdm standards which are adopted by the planning commission 2, 3, 4 august of this year the appendix is includes the tdm measures in details they may use in the tomato plan and a tdm clarification documents as carli mentioned a data driven program so we wanted to have a document that really put in writing all the data we use and these methodology that we use to develop the system she mentioned that tdm is a very dynamic field we using proven measures to the tdm standards are able to be updated more nimbly to reflect the current res

mr. teague. >> i have a question for him anyway welcome mr. ue. >> good evening covering for planning department staff briefly want to touch on the issue raised by the appellant that the information provided by mr. sanchez at the prior hearing was incorrect or misleading i was not at the hearing he looked at the video of the hearing the appellant quotes the standards that are outlined in other is cities and owners not the standards that are outlined in our ordinance in fact, our ordinance in section 178 plus provides absolutely no standard or metric for measuring intensification enlargement what necessitated the interpretation that exists in you can show on the overhead as you can see in the highlighted it states in the interpretation that the term significantly is not defined in the node code and subject to the interpretation it calls auto the types of garrett and the intensification that are significant and the specific types of enlargements not since here in question about the garrett being less than 5 hundred square feet or 25 percent it is

mr. teague. >> i have a question for him anyway welcome mr. teague. >> good evening covering for planning department staff briefly want to touch on the issue raised by the appellant that the information provided by mr. sanchez at the prior hearing was incorrect or misleading i was not at the hearing he looked at the video of the hearing the appellant quotes the standards that are outlined in other is cities and owners not the standards that are outlined in our ordinance in fact, our ordinance in section 178 plus provides absolutely no standard or metric for measuring intensification enlargement what necessitated the interpretation that exists in you can show on the overhead as you can see in the highlighted it states in the interpretation that the term significantly is not defined in the node code and subject to the interpretation it calls auto the types of garrett and the intensification that are significant and the specific types of enlargements not since here in question about the garrett being less than 5 hundred square feet or 25 percent i

mr. teague. >> i have a question for him anyway welcome mr. teague. >> good evening covering for planning department staff briefly want to touch on the issue raised by the appellant that the information provided by mr. sanchez at the prior hearing was incorrect or misleading i was not at the hearing he looked at the video of the hearing the appellant quotes the standards that are outlined in other is cities and owners not the standards that are outlined in our ordinance in fact, our ordinance in section 178 plus provides absolutely no standard or metric for measuring intensification enlargement what necessitated the interpretation that exists in you can show on the overhead as you can see in the highlighted it states in the interpretation that the term significantly is not defined in the node code and subject to the interpretation it calls auto the types of garrett and the intensification that are significant and the specific types of enlargements not since here in question about the garrett being less than 5 hundred square feet or 25 percent i