mr. teague, please. 14, 999 square feet is a precise number for america a size of i building is that meant symbolically for medium size and large scale building? mrs. hester cites enforce am i don't think a building can be examined for a discrepancy of one square foot to be small with large cap. i upon bed everwhenned she is asking. explain yet number is precisely expressed. >> sure. for the small cap has a lim of the which is 49, 999 square feet and some of our small cap projects propose up to that limit. those are new brekz comments. we have a number of projects that come in in the small cap in the low to mid dpourt's not propose to pushup against that limit. and any other thing this responsibility new construction versus conversion in an existing building if tell is new construction and america the 49, 999 square feet that it is through the planning code definition. thatting be a conversion situation that is a significant expansion. if this did occur i'm not aware of that occurring to date. butt specific cap is just a product of the system divided between the 49ers and everything botch

mr. teague, please. 14, 999 square feet is a precise number for america a size of i building is that meant symbolically for medium size and large scale building? mrs. hester cites enforce am i don't think a building can be examined for a discrepancy of one square foot to be small with large cap. i upon bed everwhenned she is asking. explain yet number is precisely expressed. >> sure. for the small cap has a lim of the which is 49, 999 square feet and some of our small cap projects propose up to that limit. those are new brekz comments. we have a number of projects that come in in the small cap in the low to mid dpourt's not propose to pushup against that limit. and any other thing this responsibility new construction versus conversion in an existing building if tell is new construction and america the 49, 999 square feet that it is through the planning code definition. thatting be a conversion situation that is a significant expansion. if this did occur i'm not aware of that occurring to date. butt specific cap is just a product of the system divided between the 49ers and everything botch

mr. teague have concerns that you can pick up on? changeoth fly relative to when we are looking at prior to this. i think it is always an issue drafting or edits on the notice. i think it dependses on the level comfort the commission has with when is before them. i understand both sides today. and -- we would if we do it today make sure it as clearly documented as possible for drafting of the final motion can be read in the record clearly what it it is. and obviously if you don't feel that can be done well today this it is something you need to consider whether or not to do it today or before with conditions. can planning department staff we don't have concerns with the conditions. thank you. >> if i may i know there is som bigutey with the become approximate fort if you want to get it done today you can incorporate the suggestions the language refeigned w with staff and return you as an informational item so you feel more comfortable with the final language. >> thank you. commissioner ruiz. >> thank you. >> i just i was not going to

mr. teague i have implementation questions for you. when you do the -- when you dot calculations for the arena adjustments and how much affordable housing provided in a prior year are you looking at entitlements for affordable housing, construction start? end of construction or occupancy? >> great question, thank you. so prop e specific low defined production. or what it means for a unit to be produced and for that purpose it is a first construction document has to be issued for the project. which -- is more than a site permit it is one of the a denneda required to begin construction usually the foundation awill be first construction document you have this issued and not start. you don't go to the effort of having a construction document issued unless you are ready to begin construction. it is different how we report. in terms of how those count toward our product for reporting to reina versus this definition in prop e. >> thank you. second question is, we have been approve and granting a number entitlements for office space constructi

mr. teague is fwhlding would be adaptive reuse with added office floor would this require one? ure asking if this was conversion without going 50,000 opposed to physically aciding the office stories. >> this build suggest a demolition, first it is a new building ify understand this correctly. no. that's nocorrect. >> can a partial floor approximate building -- the first floor remains. >> the addition of office on top. >> yes. there is a motion has been seconded to approve with conscience as have been amended. and submitted in the record >> submitted revision to strike acceptance and replace with planning approval of the first building or site permit application and adding a sentence, if in lieu option the sponsor exercise it. on this motion commissioner braun. >> ruiz. >> aye >> commissioner dimon. why aye >> commissioner imperial >> no >> commissioner koppel >> aye >> commissioner moore. >> aye >> and president tanner. aye. >> that motion passes 6 to one with imperial voting against. thank you i will close public hearing on the variance and grant the variance with the conditio