mr. tebboney became aware of this rent control, he advised the engineer to revise the drawings while retaining or relocating all existing housing services provided to his tenants. to do so we propose that the board accept the appeal only for the purpose of ordering the plan's modified to relocate the housing services and maintain an equivalent level of housing services for all the tenants. with this revision, he is directly addressed appellant's allegation of a loss of housing services, and no loss of housing service wills occur. in the event that appellant believes the relocated storage units, laundry, and bicycle parking still represents a reduction in housing services, the remedy is to seek a rent reduction from the rent board by filing a tenant petition. the remedy is not to seek the denial of a properly issued a.d.u. permit for two new units. thirdly, appellant's complain about the prior seismic retrofit work are irrelevant to the a.d.u. unit and does not comprise the integrity of the seismic work. we stand by the permits that were approved. the last point is the allegation that the physi