mr. thornly, on lunch again, mr. henderson. >> i'll just step ahead. good afternoon, committee members. i'm andy thornly, speaking as a neighbor, citizen. thank you, president breed, for bringing this forward. thank you supervisors kim and peskin for co-sponsoring. i'm supportive but very skeptical or worse of the notion of the loophole for on-site inclusionary. while we watch london t mayor of london has proposed to forbid any new parking in dense transit-rich areas of that great city on the notion that it will slow down transsit and make the streets less safe where we have high density. the same principle applies here. we really, really do want to add as much housing as we can in this part of town, especially for folks who have challenges affording market rate. that is just about everybody. so, yes, let's please have more below market rate. yes, let's have it on site. but please let's don't compromise safety of the seats. let's don't compromise the performance and the attractiveness of transit as we make the neighborhood more dense. again, i'll remind you that last year the board of su