out to mr. thorp we've had meetings on 3 separate occasions. thank you >> thank you it is closed. >> maybe i could speak to someone from the d r a request eerie of some questions. in your preemption you asked for 3 things i asked for a glaigz of the windows i guess the pitching the float roof at the very end of the proposed addition and then a setback of 6 feet. however, according to testimony and what seems to be a 7 foot separation so i don't understand why you need another 6 foot prescription. >> >> prescription. >> n from what >> i'm talking about cutting back the third floor 6 feet to the existing rear line to provide more light to come into the unit number 1 windows and number 2 windows. that would be totally blocked out >> i could agree with the pitch where it's down, however, i don't know how much light that could be base your building is to the west of the sponsors building and it sets higher than that. >> well, i'm talking about the morning light. during the wintertime the shadows that would

mr. thorpe's property. the project architect is here michael levitt is here and the rest of the team is here to answer questions. commissioners i formerly request that you does not paragraph the project as proposed. >> good afternoon mime michael is architect. if i could get the screen up please and thank you. the proposed project is an expansion of a single-family home between two centers. this image is the proposed projects. the two-story will be converted. the majority of the expansion will be fill converted to additional living space and it will pop out at the ground level space. is ground level will bees evaded to downward construction. we propose to actually lower the ceiling healthy and adolescence two feet to offer all of the building current ridge line. the third floor addition in this area is setback 17 feet off the face of the facade. it will remain with a single slope here. the subject building is 35 foot 9 niches as measured from his ridge line to above. the d r building is 8 foot below. with t

mr. thorpe's property. the project architect is here michael levitt is here and the rest of the team is here to answer questions. commissioners i formerly request that you does not paragraph the project as proposed. >> good afternoon mime michael is architect. if i could get the screen up please and thank you. the proposed project is an expansion of a single-family home between two centers. this image is the proposed projects. the two-story will be converted. the majority of the expansion will be fill converted to additional living space and it will pop out at the ground level space. is ground

mr. thorpe's concerns include the following the projects negative effects on light and air to his building and privacy to his building the projects negative effects on the open block open space and character. and is projects effect on the value of his building. we reviewed the building and neither the project requests demonstrated any negative consequences. the r d t said that because it's uphill 750 bay street casts shoolz onto the building especially in the afternoon. the r d t would not create loss of privacy. the projects windows and decks faces the subject rear yard and not directly onto the adjacent proposes. the r t d noted that the patrolled size are within the tolerance for the neighbor of the staffs recollection says no to take the r d r and approve it >> you have 5 minutes. secretary it's one 5 minute period >> and in sports of the d r will have 5 minutes. >> my name is robert thorp i'm the owner of 750 bay street. it's considered a two-story project. i've lived here for 2 seven years. i purchased this properties from my landlord who has born on the block, owned the property sin