mr. trasvina. thank you. president swig and mr. -- i was not aware you were on the e mail in this situation. and it further confused me you have mentioned that if i heard you correct low no communication with mr. emory and the hearing officer. as far as i'm aware. i and -- i will telling you tell you a person in charge of ensuring our officers screened for years i'm confident there was no improper communication. that's different you in you say there is no improper communication i want to make sure i understand the difference with there was communication with mr. emory and the hearing receive. correct the e mill. that is not ex parte communication where on the e mails with mr. emory sent are e mill that he sent to the hearing officer the pers in the matter were copied. why so the -- in the -- in the um -- city attorney's brief, to us, awhile back. it says that the hearing officer retains jurisdiction to correct mistakes in his decision. i would consider a mistake an error but in the i reversal of the decision.