mr. trudeau as it related to the whole story about manys. i don't think anyone be grudges child care but the challenge he had, symbolism versus substance, he is purporting to be prime minister of the middle class, issues that he hopes will carry favor with the middle-class, he says he won't take a cut child-care benefit himself yet he is putting the public purse right around i don't know but in this case it doesn't look like it is right given the message out there. these are the sort of things liberals are going to want to be more careful about and new governments and get themselves in trouble because they misjudged the enthusiasm and support they have and go too far. >> how much trouble did in any story cause? >> i don't want be partisan. >> we have to go to the house of commons. let's listen in. [inaudible conversations] >> hello. we will come to order. [laughter] i have the honor to inform the house that communication has been received as follows. november 30, 2015. mr. speaker has the honor to inform you the hon. david johnson governor g

mr. trudeau straightaway said he would bring in refugees by the end of the year. he won the election. canadian support has been quite high sense. i do have to say after the attacks in paris, there has been a little desire to slow the process down and make sure the spring is really rigorous. brent: slow the process down, but not the way that your neighbors south of the border, the united states, is discussing. you say that canada is putting the u.s. to shame with its refugee policy? guest: we are very different places for sure. the united states is 10 times bigger than canada, so you would expect them to take 10 times as many refugees. i think president obama has promised to bring in 10,000, but that has been quite controversial. the americans are in a different place. their debate is not how many refugees help quickly, but rather should we allow muslims in the country at all question mark of course the united states government will allow muslims to visit and emigrate, but the presidential election and congressional elections are next year and the debate is a very different space. bren

mr. trudeau may have seems to have been a place where he falls into trouble in getting caught up in the symbolism in the language of the symbolism and not in the substance. that's why it's interesting to see what today will be in terms of getting in more workmanlike behavior. i think the liberals so far as we have said have done an okay job of that but i think they are going to now start to put the fee to the fire with the house coming back next week week for his question period next week. again i think the focus is going to be on something robin talked about about the economy and the reality of the economy. we have seen the books now and you know what your promises are now. you are purporting to take these measures to increase taxes and lower them in one part of economy. we will hear a lot of that next week. >> i think to greg's point i think is right circle and the process but we have to remember in terms of the liberals said change sound they defeated mvp because it was perceived that the liberals represent a significant change now. i think the challenge they the challenge they are going to ha

mr. trudeau may have, and it seems in the past to be a place where he falls in trouble, is getting caught up in the symbolism and language, and not in the substance. that is what will be interesting to see, in terms of getting down behavior.rkmanlike i think the liberals, so far, have done an ok job. i think they will now start to put their feet to the fire for the question period next week. now, the economy, and the reality of the economy. you have seen the books, now you know what your promises are. isn't the right course of action? we will hear a lot of that next week. >> i think he is right certainly on the process, setting up the government, and getting things going. you have to remember that the saidals won because they change now. they defeated the mbp because liberals are presented significant change now. i think the challenge is demonstrating that the change will take place. the speech on the throne will be interesting in terms of what are they focusing on? it will not be a laundry list. it will be things that are trying to entrench in the minds of the economy. and, transparency

mr. trudeau justin, has promised to withdraw the bombings. >> so they're going to stop bombing.h anyway. >> that's true. that means he goes from 13 down to 12. >> nobody will even notice that canada isn't bombing because they really weren't becoming. >> then you have big other thing sorry to interrupt you but this to it me is unbelievable. you have egypt. you have germany. italy, spain japan which has the ninth largest air force in the world. >> japan? >> south korea seventh largest afersz, they're sitting on their duff. >> not doing anything. >> nothing in terms of air strikes. not at all. >> that's what i thought. on the ground, 65 nations what are they doing? >> well, you have got 20 who have advisors on the ground. >> so 20 out of the 65? >> yes. >> have advisors on the ground. >> yes. >> and some of them have like six advisors, right? >> well, i don't know if it's that few. but, yeah. >> we have five trained syrians for 500 million. that's what we do. >> that's true. so sp out of the 65 bombing. all right. and on the ground 20. >> so that means if do you the math that means

mr. trudeau, yes, uhm -- he is a 44-year-old young man. can understand for a young person to suddenly have such a huge responsibility on the shoulder. for myself, when i just won the crown, of course it's no comparison to managing a country, but i realized what kind of a role model we are setting for the rest of the population, and what kind of example we can set, so i know it's not easy, but he also had the choice. can he make the right choice to stand up for his people that are now under his protection, and i am quite looking forward to that. >> you mentioned your acting career and you're focusing on that. what about other plans in the future? what other things do you see yourself doing in your future, or would you ever consider a career in politics in canada? >> i am an actress, so i would like to take it as far as i can, but if i have my american history right, you are open to have an actor running for highest office, right? [ laughter ] >> we are almost out of time, and before i ask the last few questions, i have some housekeeping. th

mr. trudeau may have. it seems in the past to have been a place where he falls into trouble. getting caught up in the symbolism and language of the symbolism and not the substance. that's why it's interesting to see what today will be in terms of getting down to more workmanlike behavior. i think the liberals so far as we have said have done an ok job at that. i think they are going to now start to have their feet put a bit more to the fire with the house coming back next week. the first question period next week. the focus will be on something robin just talked about the economy and the reality and the economy. you have seen the books. you know what your promises are now. you're purporting to take these measures to increase taxes in one strata of the economy and lower in another. is that the right course of action? i hear a lot that have next week. >> i think to greg's point, he's right on the process of setting up the government and getting things going. you have to remember as well in terms of the public that the liberals won because they said change now. they defeated the