mr. tumlin, you are here, supervisors you have to give up your parking spaces, because we need some protected bike lanes at lease some sort of safety here. this is a bit too crazy and too dangerous for those who are biking on the streets of san francisco, and we have the ability. there is two lanes, we can figure it out. so, there is more that needs to be done. the last thing i want to say, because i know a lot of folks are up in arms over valencia, and let's be clear, it is important for us to be fearless in our pursuit to change our streets, and if we don't necessarily get it right, that's okay. there are trade-offs when we have to make these decisions and we are willing to adjust those decisions in order to make sure that we are meeting the needs of all san franciscans, but i will not give up on my desire to make our city more of a urban environment. we are a densely populated city. we are a city that needs to be to produce 82 thousand units of housing. do we want all those people driving? no. do we want all those people crowded on buses so we can smell their arm pits when they are halding

mr. tumlin. thank you for the time you've given us today. >> my pleasure.at's it for this episode. for sfgov tv i'm chris manors. thanks for watching. >> i view san francisco almost as a sibling or a parent or something. i just love the city. i love everything about it. when i'm away from it, i miss it like a person. i grew up in san francisco kind of all over the city. we had pretty much the run of the city 'cause we lived pretty close to polk street, and so we would -- in the summer, we'd all all the way down to aquatic park, and we'd walk down to the library, to the kids' center. in those days, the city was safe and nobody worried about us running around. i went to high school in spring valley. it was over the hill from chinatown. it was kind of fun to experience being in a minority, which most white people don't get to experience that often. everything was just really within walking distance, so it make it really fun. when i was a teenager, we didn't have a lot of money. we could go to sam wong's and get super -- soup for $1. my parents came here and we

mr. tumlin. thank you for the time you've given us today. >> my pleasure.anks for having me. >> and that's it for this episode. for sfgov tv i'm chris manors. thanks for watching. >> everyone loves a good sunset, but in san francisco we take to a new level. i'm city supervisor engardio and i represent an entire part of the city called the sunset. it stretches 30 glorious avenues. welcome to district 4! the sunset is a collide scope of people culture and experiences for residents of all ages. we are a beach town, we are a chinatown, and not a town at all. the sunset is home to 80 thousand people and we love our dogs. we live in neat row houses, homes with yards, story book homes and every quirk in between. the sunset used to be sand dunes all the way to the ocean. when the city needed to grow, san francisco's future ran through the sunset. we built rows and rows of housing for a great irish population and welcomed a great chinese population. today home to a gowing number of families from all backgrounds and the future starts here. >> we chose sunset knauz we

mr. tumlin, you are here, supervisors you have to give up your parking spaces, because we need some protectednes at lease some sort of safety here. this is a bit too crazy and too dangerous for those who are biking on the streets of san francisco, and we have the ability. there is two lanes, we can figure it out. so, there is more that needs to be done. the last thing i want to say, because i know a lot of folks are up in arms over valencia, and let's be clear, it is important for us to be fearless in our pursuit to change our streets, and if we don't necessarily get it right, that's okay. there are trade-offs when we have to make these decisions and we are willing to adjust those decisions in order to make sure that we are meeting the needs of all san franciscans, but i will not give up on my desire to make our city more of a urban environment. we are a densely populated city. we are a city that needs to be to produce 82 thousand units of housing. do we want all those people driving? no. do we want all those people crowded on buses so we can smell their arm pits when they are halding on? no,

mr. tumlin, you are here, supervisors you have to give up your parking spaces, because we need some protectede lanes at lease some sort of safety here. this is a bit too crazy and too dangerous for those who are biking on the streets of san francisco, and we have the ability. there is two lanes, we can figure it out. so, there is more that needs to be done. the last thing i want to say, because i know a lot of folks are up in arms over valencia, and let's be clear, it is important for us to be fearless in our pursuit to change our streets, and if we don't necessarily get it right, that's okay. there are trade-offs when we have to make these decisions and we are willing to adjust those decisions in order to make sure that we are meeting the needs of all san franciscans, but i will not give up on my desire to make our city more of a urban environment. we are a densely populated city. we are a city that needs to be to produce 82 thousand units of housing. do we want all those people driving? no. do we want all those people crowded on buses so we can smell their arm pits when they are halding on?

mr. tumlin advocated that. he said it was a great idea. muni is now going to provide that.t there's a lot of money in this project just so we'll get to that, i've spoken to many seniors, who won't come to ocean avenue because it's too long. it takes too long. the transit is not what it should be. and this project is not adding any transit, so i'd like to go a little bit into the background of the project, vision zero, as you know, was established in 2014 to eliminate traffic fatalities and coalition collisions over the next ten years, quick build projects began with a similar focus. you know, it's under the vision zero, so in december 2021, the ingleside light reported that $266,000 was to go to the frida kahlo ocean. geneva intersection, which the vision zero program identified then as a high injury corridor. thus, the project was addressing a real safety issue to remediate a serious traffic problem at a dangerous intersection, but then in 2023, but by 2023, this had morphed to a much more like the other, quick build projects. and there was a budget of 200, and i'm sorry,

mr. tumlin. thank you for the time you've given us today. >> my pleasure. thanks for having me. >> and that's it for this episode. for sfgov tv i'm chris manors. thanks for watching.