mr. updike? >> members of the committee, john updike, real-estate. jurisdictional transfer of a property at 17th street and folsom from the puc to the preparation and park department and the mayor's office of housing. it facilitates the park project on the southern part of the property and would allow for possible future development of the northern portion by the mayor's office of housing. look at that on the overhead in some detail. the representatives from recreation and park will have a much more detailed explanation of the park project itself. i am going to give you the real- estate details. this transfer has been approved by the recreation and park commission and puc commission. the project is in conformance with previous ceqa approvals noted in the legislation. we're asking the board to adopt these findings, including the community planned exemption, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program. the property is currently a parking lot under lease from the puc to ucsf > upon closing of the transfer, we will orchestrate the continued inter

mr. updike and john on the top of page four of our report, -- and shown on at the top of page four, approval would result in the first year rental reduction of 26,500 devaney $7 -- $26,877. on the bottom of page 8 of the report is the total cost of the proposed lease over the five years ranges from 707,896 to $750,624. that does not include some installation costs of $16,450. we recommend you approve this resolution. supervisor chu: thank you very much. let's open this up for public comment. any members of the public wish to speak on item number eight? seeing none, public comment is closed. to the item, can we move this forward with recommendations? we can do that without objection. thank you. do we have any other items before us? >> that completes the agenda. supervisor chu: thank you. we are adjourned. if you would like to make general public comment on an item that is not on calendar, that is item four and continued again on item 15. last, please address your comments to the commission during comment on public comment. neither commission or staff will respond to public questions but will

mr. updike regarding this presentation. i see the purchase of this facility as a good faith from the medical examiner's office in the future, meeting needs for accreditation. supervisor chu: i was curious. does accreditation, up at the end of 2012? >> correct. supervisor kim: if we move forward with this proposal, you will not be able to move in until 2016. what are your thoughts on the impact on your accreditation? does this impact your ability to get accreditation? >> i see it as a positive impact. i say that because the people that come to do these sections are also people who are in the medical examiner's field and have to deal with issues regarding capital needs for their facilities. so, they have an understanding that the process will take time. it is something we have been working on at the medical examiner's office for over 10 years. i believe that the purchase in the building will show a good- faith effort on the part of this city to move in a good-faith direction, usually sufficient for an inspector to see that we

mr. updike gave the original remarks, but is there anybody who would like to respond to the parking issue or the type of housing that will be built? ms. mcnamara, from the mayor's office of housing. >> i will definitely respond to the parking issue. for a couple of years, this is definitely been one of the things we know is an important aspect of the project. over a year ago, we started a traffic study. we are now working with the mta to implement those. we have had productive meetings with oec and other local businesses. we are working closely with supervisors cam and -- kim and campos. we will have a monthly check in as we start to work to implement parking improvement measures with the board for the neighborhood. this kind of change can be phased in over time and can be part of a better neighborhood all-around. chairperson mar: you mentioned the parking impact will not be before the fall of next year? >> fall of next year at the earliest, if i am on time with everything, for construction of the park portion. i do not know if joan would like to add anything. i think we pretty much cover

mr. updike and john on

mr. updike and john on the top of page four of our report, -- and shown on at the top of page four, approval would result in the first year rental reduction of 26,500 devaney $7 -- $26,877. on the bottom of page 8 of the report is the total cost of the proposed lease over the five years ranges from 707,896 to