mr. updike and myself, commissioner chan, if she chooses. there maybe more to this than in spending -- then spending the entire time at the commission tonight and i would like to get more input from the city attorney and other folks around that particular aspect of it. if our budget is bearing the liability, the flip side should be true, too. i would like to get an expanded vision on that aspect of this. >> my hope is we could tie this up tonight. let me ask you, would you be willing to withdraw or do you want to vote with the resolution and the three of you get together and bring it back. >> can i ask one question? would it be appropriate or has this been done to have a request that the board allocate some or all of the revenue from the police department. that is a request to the board and it would not be binding on the board. >> it has been requested that if -- the fire commission comes to mind. public health has made a request similar in nature. they were somewhat unsuccessful. it is a request. it is anticipated. from any commission looki

mr. updike has indicated, there is a difference between the proposed annual guaranteed versus the prior minimumrantee that cbs outdoor paint. it is about 73% or more less. the fact that cbs outdoor was one of the bidders, and they bid less than the proposed permit the, the total outdoor, i think that is a further indication that they simply could not cut it with that $240,000 minimum annual guaranteed. we recommend that you approve the resolution. chair chu: thank you, mr. rose. why do we not open this up for members of the, you wish to speak on this item number one? >> good afternoon, supervisors. my name is douglas, and i have lived in san francisco for 60 years. i thought this was a very interesting resolution, and the thought that occurred to me is that maybe since it is located on mission street, in a heavily divorce neighborhood, maybe the city might get even more use of that space by using it for public service announcements that would benefit the different groups living in that area. it could be used to advertise different programs the city is trying to help people with and can also be

mr. updike? supervisor olague: seems like a mute point after it was voted down. >> yes, there were discussions yesterday with the firm total outdoor, who has agreed to regulate through the permit issued a city as landlord the size of the billboard to retain it to no larger than 20 feet by 60 feet, so that if in the future there was a regulatory change at the state level that permitted a larger size, wall facing assigned to occur, we would have regulated through our document the inability to increase size, it would be a 20x60 versus 28x99 size, so that is about a 60% decrease. it could be done administratively through my authority as director of property. does not necessarily need an amendment, but happy to accommodate that, and the signing board company is as well. supervisor kim: thank you. i wanted to speak briefly on why i support this item. i only got to hear it at the budget and finance committee, but i support this because it is the current -- currently the only bill or that the city owns a

mr. updike to meet with commissioner chan and commissioner kingsley? let's put this over. >> if the commission is in favor of the proposed amendment that commissioner chan raised and its director of dyke and the department do not have concerns about that, you could certainly adopt this resolution with those changes and wrap up this discussion this evening. >> that is acceptable. i heard some fair amendments here. >> i am fine with that. president mazzucco: if you could read that back then we can go. commissioner chan: i knew this might be asked of me. ok. on the second page, the first one. the 12th clause. it should read further resolve the police commission recommend the director of real-estate implement a solicitation process to secure tenancy of the property that furthers whereas clause no. 9 above. and spurs renewal of the asset in kind -- in accordance with applicable state and local requirements. for the next one under that, second page, second clause. return to the police commission for further discussion and approval of this matter should inapp

mr. john updike. >> good afternoon, members of the committee. supervisor.anted to briefly outline we have done since we were last before you on this item. we were asked to do community outrage -- outreach, which i will go over for you. a roughly one block radius around the site would extend it further in a northerly direction. really, a sideline of walt, which is where my finger is. reawe also take a jet -- outreah to the condominium complex, to capture their attention on this item. in doing so, we also offer the opportunity for direct details. all the comments received through 5:00 on friday -- i do not think that anything has come in to my office. not today. we captured the totality of that for you. a couple of petitions were signed. i think you have all the letters as well, in the package. a visual might be helpful. one of the issues that we discussed was the difference between the proprietary apartment, the item before you today, city acting as a man board, against the regulatory permit, which the city and caltrans has a role in. this shows an old photo