mr. updike. >> thank you sir. john up dike director of director of real estate and this is to sale of easement at corner of 23rd street and potrero avenue and i was going to bring in something the size of the property but i decided not to. this is by the hospital and with adjustments serving the infrastructure adjustments that are made and this facilitates location of an electrical distribution pole. it's an area of over hang of wireos the city's property extending 5 feet on either side of the wires so that's the subject of the easement before you. the purchase price pursuant to an appraisal which i approved. because this is a sale of a permanent property right board approval is required and i am happy to answer questions. >> thank you mr. mr. updike. any questions? we will move on to public comment? seeing none. public comment is now closed. [gavel] >> i move that we approve this item. >> motion by supervisor mar. take that without objection. madam clerk can you call item 13. >> item 13 is contract contracts with

mr. updike. no questions mr. rose. can we go to the report on item 10. >> yes mr. chairman, members of the committee. in the report we report that it's shown in table one which is on page 23 of our report but based on 10,455 square feet and the cost of acquiring the easement is listed and funding was appropriated by the board of supervisors under the sfpuc water system improvement program. we recommend that you approve this resolution. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions? we will move on to public comment. anyone wishing to comment on item 10? okay. seeing none. public comment is now closed. colleagues can i have a motion to move this forward. >> so moved. >> motion by supervisor tang. we can take it without objection. madam clerk call item 11. >> item 11 requisition of the real property at 490 south van ness, the purchase price of $18,500,000. >> okay. we have the mayor's office of housing here. >> hello. the res before you is approve the acquisition of real property at 490 south van ness from the south van ness limited partnership benicia lake l

mr. updike. >> good morning chair farrell members of the committee. so this is authorization to get easements from the kaiser foundation hospitals district. these easements will facilitate construction related to the regional groundwater storage and recovery project. that boosts our regional dry water supply through the installation of groundwater walls and well stations. you have seen agreements at this committee before and there's a few more to come as well. this property is located on el camino real in san francisco. cities requiring a temporary construction easement and permanent telephone and electric easement to support the sfpuc facilities adjacent to the facility. and the cost is listed and pursuant to an appraisal which i approved. the san francisco public utilities commission authorized it which is in the board file and adopted august 12, 2014 and that's all i have on this item. >> okay. thank you mr. updike. no questions mr. rose. can we go to the report on item 10. >> yes mr. chairman, members of the committee. in the report we report that

mr. updike. >> thank you sir. john up dike director of director of real estate and this is to sale of easement at corner of 23rd street and potrero avenue and i was going to bring in something the size of the property but i decided not to. this is by the hospital and with adjustments serving the infrastructure adjustments that are made and this facilitates location of an electrical distribution pole. it's an area of over hang of wireos the city's property extending 5 feet on either side of the wires so that's the subject of the easement before you. the purchase price pursuant to an appraisal which i approved. because this is a sale of a permanent property right board approval is required and i am happy to answer questions. >> thank you mr. mr. updike. any questions? we will move on to public comment? seeing none. public comment is now closed. [gavel] >> i move that we approve this item. >> motion by supervisor mar. take that without objection. madam clerk can you call item 13. >> item 13 is contract contracts with

mr. updike. >> good to see you, chair cohen, john updike, director of real estate. good afternoon. nearly three years ago we began negotiations on a project through an exchange of letters in the fall of 2012. that is a pleasure now to outline the key terms and conditions of in non-binding term sheet that is before you for consideration. first some technical issues i need to mention and that is this document establishes the fundamental terms and economic parameters for lease to be negotiated in good faith over the coming year. with that said, the term sheet does not commit the city to approve a final ground lease, nor does it foreclose the possibility of consideration of alternatives to the proposal offered here including not approving a final ground lease. the board will not take any discretionary action relative to the ground lease unless and until the health commission and the board of supervisors have reviewed and considered the environmental documentation prepared by the regents in compliance with ceqa, and adopted appropriate ceqa findings. so with that said, both the city and

mr. updike on that one? >> john updike. the annual inventory has been done. the question is have there been additions to those properties noted by departments as surplus or underutileized and that's is where the reporting mechanism and the shrink in the current ordinance simply seeks their input. it doesn't have a lot of consequences for non reporting that we like to follow up on sus spected surplus. i'm really pleased the word in the budget moving forward from my decision, budget and finance approved a resource in that budget dedicated soly to surplus property. not only disposing and developmenting but locating and identifying and moving forward with those. we just lacked those resources so pleased to see that but we have done a annual reporting. in 2007 is when we stopped printing a book. there was a book that showed each property all 2000 parcels owned by city and county of san francisco by the lot and block. we migrated to a own line system. that is increasing transparency and reducing printing cost and it is available to the officials and staff and it is

mr. updike. >> thank you sir. john up dike director of director of real estate and this is to sale of easement at corner of 23rd street and potrero avenue and i was going to bring in something the size of the property but i decided not to. this is by the hospital and with adjustments serving the infrastructure adjustments that are made and this facilitates location of an electrical distribution pole. it's an area of over hang of wireos the city's property extending 5 feet on either side of the wires so that's the subject of the easement before you. the purchase price pursuant to an appraisal which i approved. because this is a sale of a permanent property right board approval is required and i am happy to answer questions. >> thank you mr. mr. updike. any questions? we will move on to public comment? seeing none. public comment is now closed. [gavel] >> i move that we approve this item. >> motion by supervisor mar. take that without objection. madam clerk can you call item 13. >> item 13 is contract contracts with

mr. updike. >> thank you sir. john up dike director of director of real estate and this is to sale of easement at corner of 23rd street and potrero avenue and i was going to bring in something the size of the property but i decided not to. this is by the hospital and with adjustments serving the infrastructure adjustments that are made and this facilitates location of an electrical distribution pole. it's an area of over hang of wireos the city's property extending 5 feet on either side of the wires so that's the subject of the easement before you. the purchase price pursuant to an appraisal which i approved. because this is a sale of a permanent property right board approval is required and i am happy to answer questions. >> thank you mr. mr. updike. any questions? we will move on to public comment? seeing none. public comment is now closed. [gavel] >> i move that we approve this item. >> motion by supervisor mar. take that without objection. madam clerk can you call item 13. >> item 13 is contract contracts with

mr. updike on the sro units. it is my understanding we are not proposing to rebuild the 14 sro units even if we displace these tenants. >> the project as provided to the planning department before you today for consideration excludes the acquisition of that multiresidential property so it stays as it is. i anticipate displacement as a result. >> if we do pursue using this building i believe for office commercial use because that was cont plated earlier and displacing the tenants we would find housing for these tenants. i trying to remember the sro conversion ordinance. would we replace the 14 units since we are taking 14 units off the market and converting to office? >> we provide rolocation benefit tooz those displaced. again, assuming the [inaudible] if there was a acquisition they are eligible for relocationb. squz there are a number of possibilities of how those benefits are provided from certain payment string thooz provision of replacement housing. you may recall we dilt with on central subway project so th

mr. updike on the sro units. it is my understanding we are not proposing to rebuild the 14 sro units even if we displace these tenants. >> the project as provided to the planning department before you today for consideration excludes the acquisition of that multiresidential property so it stays as it is. i anticipate displacement as a result. >> if we do pursue using this building i believe for office commercial use because that was cont plated earlier and displacing the tenants we would find housing for these tenants. i trying to remember the sro conversion ordinance. would we replace the 14 units since we are taking 14 units off the market and converting to office? >> we provide rolocation benefit tooz those displaced. again, assuming the [inaudible] if there was a acquisition they are eligible for relocationb. squz there are a number of possibilities of how those benefits are provided from certain payment string thooz provision of replacement housing. you may recall we dilt with on central subway project so th