mr. van hollen, each will control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from kentucky. mr. rogers: i ask unanimous consent that all members may have five legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the further consideration of h.r. 1314 and that i may include tabular material on the same. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. rogers: i rise today to present the house amendment to the senate amendment to h.r. 1314. the bipartisan budget agreement of 2015. an agreement that helps advance this nation's -- this nation toward our goals of fiscal stability, strong national security and entitlement reform. these are goals we've been dvocating for years. first, this agreement prevents the economic damage of a default. which could happen as early as next week. by suspending the debt limit through march, 2017. next the agreement includes the first significant reform to ocial security since 1983. by closing loopholes, increasing program integ

mr. van hollen: thank you, mr. ryan. does anybody else on the committee want to say a few words on -- ms. lujan grisham. ms. lujan grisham: thank you. hard to top my colleague, congressman ryan about the issues we're fatesing in day-to-day, life-saving health care. coming from a district with a v.a. hospital with the highest waiting list and a whole series of other access issues, both in the new personal choice program and in the program before we initiated another $17 billion for v.a. services. i want to go back to the basics. i still represent one of the most impoverished states in the country. 22% of adults and 31% of children are living in poverty. it's the second highest rate in the nation. at the same time, we're frankly fortunate to have two national labs, four military bases and lentiful natural resources meaning the federal government has a major presence in the state. as a result, frankly new york state depends more on congress doing its job than my state. but new mexico's been hurt over and over again. frankly

mr. van ostern: i think it is critical that we keep our st movingorrd i look forward to introducing myself to voters and talking about how we can build a brighter future anstng ec josh: it did not come as a surprise that you jumped in to the race. a lot of people expected you to be a candidate. was it predicated on the decision by the governor . n te: of course. she' s been doing a great job. i think we need to keep new hampshire moving forward. i have ideas about how we can create a brighr tu. certainly until she resolves the budget, which we had a good budget compromise a few we ago, and until she made her decision, it was not appropriate for me to behiinabt 2016. josh: you' ve been complementary of the goverr t y srt k voters , where do you differ? are there any errors? something you look back and say maybe i would have done ffen josh: i thk w ir mo irireio each of different people. i was not a former legislator, as our governor is. my experience is in the business world. i' ve been a busi

mr. van hollen: i agree with the gentleman that the investments in military readiness are important and the investments to help our economy grow to invest in scientific research is important. what the president said to the congress is what the vast majority of the american public believe that it's vital to have a strong national defense, but a strong national defense requires a strong economy and requires an educated work force and investments in innovation and technology and requires a 21st century infrastructure. so i'm pleased that the president insist we make investments not just in the military, but also vital investments to help the economy grow, grow more jobs, which are estimated to be in the range of 350,000 in 2016 alone. so those are vital investments that also help strengthen america and i'm pleased to yield two minutes to somebody who has been on the front lines of making those important investments for our country, mrs. lowey, the very distinguished ranking member of the appropr

mr. van hollen: i'm now pleased to yield two minutes to mr. ellison of minnesota, a distinguished member of the financial services committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from minnesota is recognized for two minutes. mr. ellison: i thank the gentleman for the time, i plan on voting for this bill but i'm not going to celebrate that. it lifts the debt ceiling and don't have to fear defaulting on america's debts. avoids cuts in medicare and disability insurance. but the fact is, no one here, no one in this room can say that this piece of legislation that we are looking at now is going to advance america, bring us progress that we actually really need. do you know that since 2012, we have seen 640 fewer national institute of health grants. haven't been making the investments in science. this is a survival budget and we need to survive. so i'm going to vote for this piece of legislation, but we must come to the moment in time when we are looking to advance our country to move forward and

mr. van hollen, the procedure is as follows. first ranking member and i will each make an opening statement, i ask that members insert their written statement into the record. i will hold the record open until the end of the day for that purpose. after the opening statements, staff will be available for a 10-minute question and answer period, followed up to 40 minutes of debate on the reconciliation bill. we will proceed with a motion to the house, the recommendation submitted to us pursuant to the reconciliation instructions. after voting to report the restoring americans freedom reconciliation act, we will debate up to two motions, one by the majority and one for the minority. there will be 20 minutes of debate. the proponent will be recognized for eight minutes and opponent, 10. the proponent will have 10 minutes to close. i now recognize the gentleman from indiana, mr. rokita. mr. rokita: i ask unanimous consent that consistent with clause 4 of house rule 16 the chairman be authorized to

mr. van hollen: mr. speaker, i now yield one minute to ms. moore of wisconsin, a distinguished member of the budget committee. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady from wisconsin is recognized for one minute. ms. moore: good morning, mr. speaker. thank you, ranking member, for the time. since we are considering this reconciliation bill, i looked up the record reconciliation because i thought maybe i don't know what the word means. and they say that reconciliation is a process of making consistent or compatible. mr. speaker, there is nothing in the bill before us that is either consistent or compassible with the woman's constitutional right to control her body. this bill is neither consequencecies tent nor compatible with a woman's human right to reproductive freedom. this bill, the only thing this bill reconciles is the majority's machismo, mr. speaker, the stubborn resolve, to deny women, especially the poorest women in our country, access to health care. and despite the claims that you have heard he

mr. van hollen. >> is absolutely mind boggling that we are here on this day in this place was this piece of legislation in front of us. it's a crisis of leadership in the republican caucus and it may be a matter of political intrigue to some but the reality is we have a huge number of pressing issues facing the country right now. we have our debt payment and debt ceiling that needs to be addressed to the united states makes good on the full faith and credit of the united states so we don't put our economy at great risk. for the 62nd time here we are by my count of trying to dismantle the affordable care act and on top of that attack women's health programs including planned parenthood. rather than tackling those issues here we are trying to do the bidding of the faction of the house i can't come to terms with the fact that the affordable care act twice by the supreme court. i draw my colleagues attention to the congressional budget congressional budget office is an analysis of the reconciliat

mr. van hollen: thank you, madam speaker. i want to start by joining the comments of the chairman of the appropriations committee, mr. rogers, in congratulating all those who came together to iron out their differences and produce this agreement. it is not a perfect agreement. but it is far better than the alternative, the alternative which would have produced great damage to the economy, as opposed to this agreement which will help boost economic growth and make important national investments. what a difference a week makes. just last week we had on this floor a bill that would have jeopardized the full faith and credit of the united states. it was a piece of legislation that says, the united states government only has to pay some of its bills. doesn't have to pay all of its bills. that would have been an awfuls pretent that would have put the economy at risk. even worse, it said, well, when we decide which bills we're going to pay, we're going to first pay all the bondholders, like china and the folks on wall street, rather

mr. van hollen: i thank you, mr. speaker. i want to thank the ranking member for bringing those troubling revelations to the attention of the house. it shows what a sham process this has been from the beginning. mr. speaker, we've got a lot of work to do in this congress. we've got to come together with a budget agreement to keep the government open, to invest in our economy, to deal with modernizing our transportation and infrastructure in this country. and yet, what are republicans bringing to the floor? another measure to create another so-called select committee to investigate planned parenthood when as we've heard today three other house committees have already done that. and what has been the sum total of that investigation? well, the chairman of the oversight and government reform committee told us on national television when he was asked if planned parenthood had broken any laws, answer, no, i'm not suggesting they broke the law. and so when you don't get the answer you want, what do you do? create another special com

mr. van hollen: i thank you, mr. speaker. i want to thank the ranking member for bringing those troubling revelations to the attention of the house. it shows what a sham process this has been from the beginning. mr. speaker, we've got a lot of work to do in this congress. we've got to come together with a budget agreement to keep the government open, to invest in our economy, to deal with modernizing our transportation and infrastructure in this country. and yet, what are republicans bringing to the floor? another measure to create another so-called select committee to investigate planned parenthood when as we've heard today three other house committees have already done that. and what has been the sum total of that investigation? well, the chairman of the oversight and government reform committee told us on national television when he was asked if planned parenthood had broken any laws, answer, no, i'm not suggesting they broke the law. and so when you don't get the answer you want, what do you do? create another special com

mr. van hollen: i thank you, mr. speaker. i want to thank the ranking member for bringing those troubling revelations to the attention of the house. it shows what a sham process this has been from the beginning. mr. speaker, we've got a lot of work to do in this congress. we've got to come together with a budget agreement to keep the government open, to invest in our economy, to deal with modernizing our transportation and infrastructure in this country. and yet, what are republicans bringing to the floor? another measure to create another so-called select committee to investigate planned parenthood when as we've heard today three other house committees have already done that. and what has been the sum total of that investigation? well, the chairman of the oversight and government reform committee told us on national television when he was asked if planned parenthood had broken any laws, answer, no, i'm not suggesting they broke the law. and so when you don't get the answer you want, what do you do? create another special com

sessions, the gentleman from maryland, mr. van hollen, the gentleman from north carolina, mr. mchenry, and the members of the wisconsin delegation -- mr. sensenbrenner, mr. kind, ms. moore, mr. duffy, mr. ribble, mr. pocan, mr. grothman. the gentlelady from california, mrs. mimi walters. the members will retire from the chamber to escort the speaker-elect to the chair. the sergeant at arms: mr. speaker, the speaker-elect, paul d. ryan of wisconsin. >> the 114th congress of the united states. floor strength yen and inspired by the support of our colleagues. the constituents and the love of our families. my special thanks to all of you my children en, nine grandchildren, and the family for their support. the people of san francisco. the continued honor to represent them here. my heartfelt thanks to my colleagues for extending to me the honor of being nominated to the speaker of the house. thank you very much. said to his constituents and this congress with honor for 25 years. peaker john boehner. in his story we are reminded of the enduring exceptional promise of america. this h

mr. van hollen: thank you, madam speaker. i want to start by joining the comments of the chairman of the appropriations committee, mr. rogers, in congratulating all those who came together to iron out their differences and produce this agreement. it is not a perfect agreement. but it is far better than the alternative, the alternative which would have produced great damage to the economy, as opposed to this agreement which will help boost economic growth and make important national investments. what a difference a week makes. just last week we had on this floor a bill that would have jeopardized the full faith and credit of the united states. it was a piece of legislation that says, the united states government only has to pay some of its bills. doesn't have to pay all of its bills. that would have been an awfuls pretent that would have put the economy at risk. even worse, it said, well, when we decide which bills we're going to pay, we're going to first pay all the bondholders, like china and the folks on wall street, rather

brian holland, mr. vanhollen moved the committ thi on the bat tget directed to chairmn to request on behalf of the committee, the rule for consideration of the reconcilze tion bill, make an order and an amendment that would one, strike all the underlying tsico, which is an irre cloonsible attack on women's healthcare in the affordable care act, and to replace it with ani 3708, which calls for bipartisan negotiation to raise the discretionary spending caps for fiscal yearja016 for those negotiations ad aeal raise the defense and non-defense discretionary cap by equal amounts. to allow ad aroprze tion to pruld thid and fund essential services at necessary levels. >> gentleman from maryland is recof tnate for eight minutes. then two minutes to close. >> thank you. as i said at the outset of this coothittee markup, rather than woomaing to repeal the affordabe care act for whatever the 61st time and rollback important protection we really should be focused on some of the issues of the country including mchhing s

brian holland, mr. vanhollen moved the committ thi on the bat tget directed to chairmn to request on behalf of the committee, the rule for consideration of the reconcilze tion bill, make an order and an amendment that would one, strike all the underlying tsico, which is an irre cloonsible attack on women's healthcare in the affordable care act, and to replace it with ani 3708, which calls for bipartisan negotiation to raise the discretionary spending caps for fiscal yearja016 for those negotiations ad aeal raise the defense and non-defense discretionary cap by equal amounts. to allow ad aroprze tion to pruld thid and fund essential services at necessary levels. >> gentleman from maryland is recof tnate for eight minutes. then two minutes to close. >> thank you. as i said at the outset of this coothittee markup, rather than woomaing to repeal the affordabe care act for whatever the 61st time and rollback important protection we really should be focused on some of the issues of the country including mchhing s

and look forward to today's debate and i now yield for his opening statement to the ranking member, mr. van holland. >> thank you, mr. chairman. it is absolutely mind-boggling that we are here in this piece of legislation, we all know the be have a crisis of leadership within the republican caucus and that may be just a matter of political intrigue to some. this is causing harm to the country as we speak. we had at huge number of pressing issues facing the country right now. the threat of another government shutdown in mid december, we have got the debt payments and debt ceiling that needs to be addressed so the united states makes good on the full faith and credit of the united states so we don't put the economy at great risk. we have transportation authorization bill that expires within weeks. here we are today for that 62 time trying to dismantle the affordable care act and on top of that attack women's health programs including planned parenthood. so rather isn't tackling those issues, here we are trying to do the bidding of a faction of this house that just can't come to terms with the

island hospital again today, and while it's unclear exactly what they were doing, this magnet for mr. van misery remains an open invitation, three days after 16- year-old marcus castille fell to his death, seven floors down an elevator shaft in this ghostly facility where a shrine in his memory grows just outside the front gate. mother cried on the weekend, as her husband demands answers as to why this empty wreck of a property remained so accessible for decades. the family says it has heard from no city officials. calls from cbs 2 to local councilwoman deborah rose have been not been returned. sir, can you tell us, but it a young man have to die at the secured facility? this man who responded no comment when asked if he's associated with the ownership of the perilous property on a part of a number of workers at the site today, were nonetheless a giant hole in the fence remains on the side of the property. despite the belated scramble to secure this site, it is still easy to get in by the front fence here. even i could get over that. >> someone has to put down the building because i don't

sessions, mr. van holland, mr. mchenry. and the members of the wisconsin delegation, mr. kind, mr. moore, mr. duffy, mr. ruble. ms. mimi walters. the committee will retire from the chamber to escort the speaker-elect to the chair. >> all right. i want to bring back jeff zeleny while we await these two minutes or so as paul ryan is escorted. i would suppose up to where john boehner is now, right, jeff? >> reporter: that's right. john boehner is still in his seat there, but the escort committee is a group of both sides who brings in the new speaker here. just like during the state of the union address, there's a committee of members who bring them in. so, it's just a bit of formality. i've been looking through some of the biography of paul ryan. i've covered him for a long time. shortly after he was elected here. and i think i'm pretty safe in saying that he's the first speaker of the house to ever have worked at mcdonald's as a high school -- as a young man, at 16 years old. his father actually died when he was 16. he's from janesville, wisconsin, and he got a job working

gentleman from maryland, mr. van hollen. gentleman from north carolina, mr.members of the wisconsin delegation. mr. sensenbrenner, mr. kind, miss moore, mr. duffy, mr. ribble, mr.-- california, miss mimi walters. the committee will retire from the chamber to escort the speaker-elect to the chair. bill: first quarterly 236 votes for the wisconsin republican. he had wanted or had been or has been the chairman of the house ways and means committee. that is something paul ryan pursued for a long time. a lot of power over taxes, money, and budget and that is something very dear to him going back to the early 1990s. three years ago, paul ryan was on the ticket with mitt romney and that did not turn out the way both men had hoped. now, speaker-elect in the house of representatives at age of 45. a reluctant leader in this role. but over some cajoling from a number of colleagues on house side and republican side, paul ryan has now gotten knee-deep in the politics of washington, d.c. as he tries to, tries to herd his fellow republicans and also appeal to democrats and

i now now yield the opening statement to mr. van hollen. >> think mr. chairman. it's apsley mind-boggling that we are here, on this day, in this place, with this piece of legislation in front of us. we all know that we have a crisis of leadership within the republican caucus, that may be just a matter of political intrigue to some, but the reality is it is causing harm to the country as we speak. we have a huge number of pressing issues facing our country right now. we have the threat of another government shutdown in mid-december, we have our debt payments on debt ceiling that needs to be address of the united states makes good on the full faith and credit of the united states so we do not put our economy at great risk. we have transportation authorization bill that expires within weeks, yet here we are today, for the 62nd time, by my my count, trying to dismantle the affordable care act and on top of that attack women health programs including planned parenthood. rather than tackling those issues, here we are trying to do the bidding of a faction of this house

miss processions, the gentleman from maryland, mr. van holland and mr.of the wisconsin delegation. mr. sense brenner, mr. kind, mr. moore, mr. duffy, mr. ribble, mr. pocan. mimi walters. the committee will retire from the chamber to escort the speaker-elect to the chair. >> it might have been easier to ask those members of the house who are not escorting the speaker of the house, but there's john boehner again with the emotional announcement that there is a new speaker. and nicolle wallace, those watching at home would be forgiven if they thought that somehow colin powell was looking at a lifelong quest to become speaker of the house. he has no control over the fact that in the last two elections a vote has been cast for him. >> he might be the only person who wanted the job less than paul ryan. might be colin powell. i keep thinking watching this that paul ryan benefits so much from watching the attempts that john boehner and kevin mccarthy in his short time of trying to run for speaker, they tried to deal with that caucus of super conservative members,

caller: good morning mr. van halen. just wondering when you talk about entitlement, you always talk about old people. you talk about medicare and social security. why don't you ever talk about section eight, food stamps? why do people keep having five or six or seven kids they know they can't pay for? after two kids, you know your situation is not any better. they need to enforce the section eight rules better. pay for a mother and her kids to live there, not some gang banger in baltimore to have somewhere to lay up all day and then do crime all night. and why do we even need food stamps anymore? kids eat breakfast, lunch, and dinner at school. why do we need food stamps? if they say their kids are going to be hungry if they don't get them, somebody needs to go to jail because they are not treating their kids with them. the reality is that in this economy, many people are falling through the cracks through no fault of their own. people look for work and are not able to find it. because of low wages, people are scramblin

sessions, the gentleman from maryland, mr. van hollen, the gentleman from north carolina, mr. mchenry, and the members of the wisconsin delegation -- mr. sensenbrenner, mr. kind, ms. moore, mr. duffy, mr. ribble, mr. pocan, mr. grothman. the gentlelady from california, mrs. mimi walters. the members will retire from the chamber to escort the speaker-elect to the chair. the sergeant at arms: mr. speaker, the speaker-elect, paul d. ryan of wisconsin. >> the 114th congress of the united states. floor strength yen and inspired by the support of our colleagues. the constituents and the love of our families. my special thanks to all of you my children en, nine grandchildren, and the family for their support. the people of san francisco. the continued honor to represent them here. my heartfelt thanks to my colleagues for extending to me the honor of being nominated to the speaker of the house. thank you very much. said to his constituents and this congress with honor for 25 years. peaker john boehner. in his story we are reminded of the enduring exceptional promise of america. this h

investigation failed to turn up evidence of foul play and found no additional information on the van seen outside mr. krueger's home the night he died and there was no followup on the sexual assault samples taken at the autopsy. >> so, basically closed. kind of a cold status. unless somebody comes forward and says, i knew him. i saw him the day before. he mentioned this. or i saw him with this person. which could kind of open the door. >> i'm just not quite comfortable with certifying the death either as an accident or a homicide and i'm left with an indeterminate manner of death. >> this is one of the frustrating aspects of forensic pathology. it's when you're faced with a case where the eyes are on you to answer the questions how did this person die? and under what circumstances did they die? where you have to acknowledge that just may not have enough to work with to answer that question. >> it's the rare case that isn't solved around here. for the most part, the macomb county medical examiner is able to coax secrets out of the dead. before they're released and sent off to their final resting plac

mr. rickerson owed him back pay. >> matt took the van to texas, where he abandoned it and then crossed into long before he ran into trouble in that country, killing a man outside of a bar, and then serving nine years in a mexican jail. when he was finally extradited to the u.s. to stand trial on rickerson's murder, the court reportedly installed snipers outside just in case he made a run for it. matt also wore electrodes under his suit in court so guards could shock him if he became unruly. his former girlfriend likely sealed his fate, testifying that he confessed to her he had broken rickerson's neck. she said he told her it was an accident. perhaps just as cunning and dangerous was david sweat. at 35, he is supposed to spend the rest of his life behind bars here for killing sheriff's deputy kevin tarsia. after sweat and two other men had robbed a fireworks and gun store, the deputy confronted them. his sister spoke by phone with anderson cooper. >> i never put it out of my mind. i always think about what he did, and how awful this guy is. >> it was july 4th, 2002. deputy tarsia pulled int

sam clovis, with me again dana lash, host of dana on the blaze, and cnn political commutator, van jones. mrump is going to portray himself as this truth teller, shouldn't he be speak iing the truth or admi when he is caught saying things that he didn't, you know, that he reversing himself on the based on something that he said two weeks before? >> well, i thought that we were going to have a discussion on policy tonight, and i'm sorry this is where it is headed -- >> this is about policy. >> he said he was against going to afghanistan and now is -- >> i don't appreciate this at all. i didn't have any indication this is where we were going to be going with this. i thought that we were going to be talking about policy and where we are in the campaign and the polling and where we are going to be ending up in this thing, but if these are the issues that you want to bring in, fine, and ri will let the other commentators comment on it. >> but you are involved in the policy on afghanistan and i would assume that you are involved in the the policy of taking away the guns. >> i'm involved in the pol

sam clovis, with me again dana lash, host of dana on the blaze, and cnn political commutator, van jones. mris, so i mean if trump is going to portray himself as this truth teller, shouldn't he speak speaking the truth or at least admit when he's been caught saying things think didn't -- or reversing himself based on something he said two weeks before? >> i thought we were going to have a discussion on policy tonight. i'm sorry where this is heading. >> this is policy. >> well -- >> he said he was against going to afghanistan and now is -- >> i don't appreciate this at all. i didn't have any indication this is where we were going to be going with this. i thiol we were going to be talking about policy and where we are in the campaign and our polling, and where we're going to end up with this thing. but if these are the issues, that's fine. i'll let the other commentators comment on it. >> you're involved in the policy on afghanistan, i i'm you're involved in the policy on taking away the guns -- >> i'm involved in the policy on afghanistan, because the president of the united states is still

mr. lee would say, "good job, fine driver, number one driver" and he would go like this [thumbs up gesture]. and then as brian would be helping him off the van, mr. lee, i heard him so often say, "brian, if anybody gives you any trouble you send them to me and i'll take care of them." and here great big old brian would say, "henry, you're the first one i would try to get help from." and he says, "the second one is elsa." [laugh] so we knew that we were being relied on by brian. a few weeks back, mrs. lee called brian early in the morning to tell him not to bother picking them up because they were already at the hospital. mr. lee was ill and she had taken him to the er. the next day or so, brian, on his lunchtime, found out that mr. lee had been admitted to the hospital and he went up to mr. lee's room and just stuck his head in just to say hello. and the minute mr. lee saw him he went [gesture thumb up in the air] like that. and mrs. lee said, "he's telling you again you're number one driver. so brian really appreciated that; he thought that was really sweet. but he could see mr. lee wasn't doing so well so he left really quickly. and unfort

mr. mcgovern: let's van amendment and let's have that debate and let's vote on it. that's all i'm asking. we disagree. mr. stivers: thank you. reclaiming my time. reclaiming my time. the problem with the amendment -- you know, the problem with the amendment was it would have conflicted with that good faith language and somebody could have pointed to that section and said, see, nothing can take away my right to sue. this good faith exception takes away my right to sue even though they acted in good faith. that denies me a right, and so it was a -- it was conflicting language. mr. mcgovern: what is wrong with bringing this amendment up and debating it, that was my question. mr. stivers: i hear your point there. i tell you if we debated the amendment i believe it would have been defeated. frankly, the problem with it was if it was narrowly crafted to keep the good faith exception i would have been ok with it. so reclaiming my time. do believe that we should be debating serious issues. i do believe that the private right of action is kept intact. there is only a good fai

that is charles hurt from "the washington times," a columnist there and van jones, a former official in the obama administration. mrwho won, hillary clinton, bernie sanders, somebody else? >> i think without a doubt hillary clinton won. you know, bernie sanders obviously did very well. he always does well with social media types, and he certainly is probably raised a ton of money last night with all of his sort of avuncular talk and straight talk, but, you know, the fact that nobody laid a glove on hillary clinton and nobody landed a real good punch on her. the fact even bernie sanders kind of folded in his past attacks about the e-mail server, you know, all of that means that she was left standing, and i think she akuwaited herself actually very, very well. you know, she was left standing without any punches landed. >> you think with joe biden the competition would stiffen up. nobody landed a punch, even bernie sanders. do you think joe biden would have been different if he had been in there? >> i don't know. it's interesting because all the men object stage seemed to be kind of -- didn't really know how to -- to

mr. phipps disappeared from the park. now any time people drive by this park they see a sign telling them he's still missing. this vanome somewhat of a fixture in watkins park. on every sign are photos of a man who hasn't been seen for weeks. he has dementia and is 80 years and has lived at the woodmoor house assisted living and that's when he disappeared his family says. >> when i listened to my voice message it said when you get a minute to call. >> reporter: phipps' daughter michelle soon learned that the center took him and 20 others to a big senior picnic at the park. is that this was the first time i learned that -- >> this was the first time i learned that he was attending this picnic. they never called us prior to the event. >> reporter: from what michelle was told, her dad asked to go to the bathroom and wasn't seen again. >> it sounds like the person that was sitting with him never even looked right or left to see which direction he was going of. >> reporter: at first she said woodmoor house was helpful. >> i would get calls every evening to check in. >> reporter: but then she had questions. >> did they hav

mr. speaker, consider the case of ann, a usaid worker who was posted in the u.s. embassy in beirut in 1983. at 1:00 p.m. on april 18 a suicide bomber in a delivery van drove 2,000 pounds of explosives into the front door of our u.s. embassy, and the blast demolished the front of the building and caused the upper floors to collapse on top of each other. and when that went off, she was eating lunch in the embassy cafeteria. until suddenly she awoke outside covered in cement with 19 bones broken, 63 people killed in that blast. now, we have a moral obligation to ensure that these judgments for these victims, which represent iran's legal debt to the victims of its official policy of terrorism are paid. there have been 90 such attacks on americans, and this legislation helps us fulfill that moral obligation we have to our constituents and to all americans. what i will share with you is that it is not going to work to release the $100 billion first, because that $100 billion goes into the hands of the irgc. they are the ones who have taken over the companies in iran as of 1979. and the iranian revolutionary guards' force and the quds forces are the ones t

mr. trump or dr. carson will participate in your debate if it's longer than 120 minutes including commercials and does not include opening and closing statements. last night, trump told greta van sustron cnbc's format is all about the money. >> they want to make this an extra hour. and i think it's unfair to the viewers because it's too much. it's too much to watch and they're doing it because they want to make more money. >> carly fiorina, who is the other leading political outsider in the gop race says prepared statements are for politicians. >> i think apparently they're worried about answering questions for three hours. for heaven sakes, we have ten candidates on the stage. i don't think three hours is a long time. i think we ought to stand and answer as many questions as we can. >> for its part, cnbc says it may be willing to make changes to the debate's format and that debate is scheduled for october 28th. heather. >> garrett, thank you. we'll see what happens. >>> in the meantime, it is time to take a look at who is talking. fox news contributor karl rove bringing back his whiteboard. you've seen that before. and he's weighing in on who will be the next person to drop o

talk about collateral damage and precision, you'll see a lot more civil van casualties in the fight as russia attempts to support mr>> syrian civilians will suffer and perhaps russia will suffer long time and perhaps retribution against russia. nato, you you served in europe. they are trying to show signs of strength with military exercises and ramping up things in hungary and other countries. does russia care? look, russia took back crimea from ukraine with no real military retribution there. they've been fighting in ukraine with no military retribution there. they'reple booing in syria and no one is stopping them there. why should they care that nato is doing exercises right now? >> date know has been conducting these kind of exercises for years. in many cases we've invited -- when i was there, we invited russia into the exercises with us. they certainly do here. i was at a conference a few weeks aneg europe where a russian expert showed a map from the russian perspective where they believe they were on the strategic defensive. a ring, a circle around russia where they're showing all the countries where the unite

van. >> as he exited his vehicle, he was confronted by an armed subject. as a result of the confrontation, the officer discharged his firearm resulting in the death of mr.ones. >> reporter: but both the prosecutor and the jones' family attorney say corey never fired his weapon. the family attorney says his body was found 80 to 100 feet away from his vehicle, making it seem as though he might have possibly tried to run away. >> we know this officer was in plain clothes. we know that he had no badge to display to corey. corey had no way of knowing what he was. >> reporter: the officer was working a burglary detail that night and had no body or dashboard camera. he's now on paid leave and many in the community are left wondering how a man with no criminal record ended up dead. >> a laid back young man, non-confrontational which is why i find it hard to believe. >> reporter: records show otherwise. evidence he had seized three weeks prior from a suspect. at the time he sited work related issues, something he failed to mention on his application for the palm beach garden police department. the job he's held for just six months. >> this is a situation that cr

mr. bladder but what happens going forward, however the situation with fifa is resolved, he needs somebody representing them when a new president will be announced on february the 26 and put someone forward like vangoing to stand in the election and eventually stood to the side and do they look outside of europe and get a candidate from the middle east, this is a very difficult time because they want to give their support to him but there was disagreement between representatives in that meeting where he himself wasn't there, he was represented by his lawyers. moving forward even though all 54 nations have released a statement saying they are behind him for now, that could still change in the future. >> ali has officially submitted candidacy for the up coming fifa election and the jordan people failed to make the blatter emotion but the resignation created a vacancy again, on wednesday prince ali warned against delaying the meeting which he believes could have more instability within fifa and if elected the prince will restore the image of the world football governing body and saying the crisis atrophy fa is for change with discussion over the future and a better future will only come if ideas tur

seale: fourteen van-loads of furniture were taken out of roosevelt's things. because of his condition and also mrsroosevelt's nature, as you saw in the last show, they liked to have everything around them all the time. they were table people. and they had tables in front of things, and all his things were in easy reach, so there were just thousands of things, pictures, all sorts of things. and imagine what the trumans faced when they went in there with these squares on the wall where pictures had been and the carpets taken up and the floors that jiggled like that. the transition was they only -- they had a little apartment in town and they took the piano from it. that's all they moved. swain: did they go immediately to the white house or did they spend some time at blair house? seale: no, no. anslover: no. well, the trumans thought they could stay in their apartment until they moved into the white house. they offered mrs. roosevelt as much time as she needed. she took about two weeks, i think. but by then, the trumans realized that security-wise they could not stay in their apartment, so they were

mrs. xyz is leaving our custody. once they leave our doors, then the impression, suppositions and the reality is that ice advance -- vans pull around to pick people up. i thought this was what we were trying to get away from. so leaving that possibility that we are aiding and betting to the notification process so if someone is exiting our custody then we then absolve ourselves because we are acting consistent with sanctuary city and due process for all, then i think that we are lying to ourselves and being intellectually dishonest by the fact that ice has been informed to when to pick somebody up unless we have parameters as to guide us who those somebodies are and that affects the conflict to due process for all. because that is in conflict to what is stipulated as to who it is that we would be subject to deat tainment and silent on the notification. the question is: is this the policy that the city would like us to pursue? if it is the policy, then in an open and transparent way that's fine. there was a letter sent september 28th stating that every sheriff in the state of california, a lot less liberal than ours that

mrs. xyz is leaving our custody. once they leave our doors, then the impression, suppositions and the reality is that ice advance -- vans pull around to pick people up. i thought this was what we were trying to get away from. so leaving that possibility that we are aiding and betting to the notification process so if someone is exiting our custody then we then absolve ourselves because we are acting consistent with sanctuary city and due process for all, then i think that we are lying to ourselves and being intellectually dishonest by the fact that ice has been informed to when to pick somebody up unless we have parameters as to guide us who those somebodies are and that affects the conflict to due process for all. because that is in conflict to what is stipulated as to who it is that we would be subject to deat tainment and silent on the notification. the question is: is this the policy that the city would like us to pursue? if it is the policy, then in an open and transparent way that's fine. there was a letter sent september 28th stating that every sheriff in the state of california, a lot less liberal than ours that

telling greta van susteren that this is kind of environment that encourages criminals and makes many officers somewhat reluctant at times to do their duty. >> i don't know who appointed mrocate against police but fact is what he did was very irresponsible. his movies are very violent. being anti-police is just not productive. and the people who get hurt are the public, when these things are done. martha: joined by leslie marshall, syndicated radio talk show host and blogger for the huff "washington post." david webb, siriusxm patriot, come himmist for "the hill." both are fox news contributors. good to have you both here. it is pretty, tasteless and outrageous that many would say that quentin tarantino would stand up at a parade and protest in the city and stand in front of a podium that says rise up, stop police terror and talked about the violence that he sees being done on the part of police officers in this city when this police officer's body has not yet been laid to rest. leslie what do you think. >> well, first of all this protest was planned weeks before this officer lost his life. obviously it's tear, when anyone, especially police officers lose their life in t

mrs. xyz is leaving our custody. once they leave our doors, then the impression, suppositions and the reality is that ice advance -- vans pull around to pick people up. i thought this was what we were trying to get away from. so leaving that possibility that we are aiding and betting to the notification process so if someone is exiting our custody then we then absolve ourselves because we are acting consistent with sanctuary city and due process for all, then i think that we are lying to ourselves and being intellectually dishonest by the fact that ice has been informed to when to pick somebody up unless we have parameters as to guide us who those somebodies are and that affects the conflict to due process for all. because that is in conflict to what is stipulated as to who it is that we would be subject to deat tainment and silent on the notification. the question is: is this the policy that the city would like us to pursue? if it is the policy, then in an open and transparent way that's fine. there was a letter sent september 28th stating that every sheriff in the state of california, a lot less liberal than ours that

harrison and a tiny office is van ness and one of the commenters mentioned earlier the health care i wanted to say how well medi-cal has been doing for me thank you. >> mr. yip why don't i bring it home. >> housing citizen people for prospect developers the principle of sustaining an economy for the donation that even donald trump will agree b upon with the formula to be analyzed under the 3 facts and circumstances factors of the criteria physically and working model this tommy trend and - they work from one husband and wife for leadership and followers with the opportunity of politics and education and mission force one we property with the projections the components of your compassion and wisdom and all things principles of everything and individualized of everything about striking a way for true feminist for the holiness and for management knowing of keeping all good things assembled together and to - such key areas for planning consideration can step forward for the good things if prosperity for example, quickbites coffee avenue and beverly hills, etc. east bay material phenomena structural of original design and integrity and value into the leaders

mr. chairman. it makes a car a volkswagen. that ad campaign swept the nation in the '90s. vw has long enjoyed an almost-cultish following dating back to the beetle, vw van and the be rabbit. but through the years something apparently became rotten, and cheating and betrayal became part of that game plan. there's a lot that we don't know about vw's actions or their motivations in attempting to skirt emissions standards. but regardless of intent, they have betried the trust of -- betrayed the trust of regulate e, dealers and suppliers, and most important, the driving public. probably the most famous congressional hearing question is what did you know and when did you know it. asked by senator howard baker back in the '70s at watergate. now we learn that you knew some 18 months ago. so we add, what did you really do to fix it and come clean versus simply going along? ultimately, the saying rings true: cheaters never prosper. and that's why we're here today. we have many questions about how we got here and the road ahead. why would one of the world's largest automakers go to such lengths to avoid emissions requirements? who was responsible for these decisio