mr. virili said something hypothetical. that's the first.hen you had the more liberal justices standing to the -- turning to the standing question with texas' lawyer scott keller and justice breyer said your view of injury here is so broad that every time the state has a political disagreement with theh federal government, it would sue the federal government, we could have a flood of litigation. >> sreenivasan: so those are the two big issues. >> that's one issue. >> sreenivasan: just one issue. >> yes. the second issue is the fundamental issue, is this program legal? does it violate the law? did the president go a step too far? there again youo saw almost the ideological breakdown. the government said we're exercising enforcement discretion. there are eleven million immigrants, congress never appropriated enough money for us to deport all of them but congress does give us this enforcement discretion that presidents have been exercisingg for decades.s. texas says, huh-uh, this is a different type of program, by giving deferred deportation to