mr. wagoner says about the bad faith. just because you have a contract on april 16, he assumes that as soon as the contractor signs the contract that he has to start work. he says, "how could he have done nothing until may 24?" it is very usual for people to enter into contracts and then wait six weeks until they get the permit to start work. that is not a discrepancy. there is nothing bad faith about that. it does not mean that as soon as he signed a contract you have to start work. >> nor does it answer the $66,000 question. >> i do not have any idea how the contractor put $40,000.100 dozen dollars on the contract. i do not know the answer. >> maybe dbi will offer up something. commissioner peterson: you started your argument that this pharmacy will be good for the neighborhood. has there been a change in the business plan? other products other than prescription drugs being sold? >> to my knowledge, there has been no change in this plan. there is going to be prescription drugs. it will be a general pharmacy. i assume th

mr. wagoner, i am curious. if the sheriff is able to go on and bring new deputy sheriffs, and there is a range, a modification on the security potentially, could that not then begin the discussion of whatever additional staffing, how we might be able to complement the police department, sort of actions, tasks, and activities, because the question of a dollar is a dollar, it is still a savings. without detracting from their current duties that they are assigned to do. >> sure. the issue would be that it may be cheaper to perform a service with sheriff's deputies than police officers. however, unless we have an excess of sheriff's deputies, which it looks likely that we will not, we hire sheriff's deputies to perform a service to do something currently done by police officers. we are paying the salaries of the police ulcers and those going to work patrol functions or whatever they are going to do. it may be more cost-effective for that particular service to provide it with sheriff's deputies, with budgetary costs

mr. wagner to talk through the document itself. >> thank you, supervisors. greg wagoner. so, i will walk through some of the contents of the plan. one thing just to say by way of a starting point, we have been developing this plan and trying to emphasize that there is a problem statement in this plan as well as a solution statement in this plan. the baseline projection shows that if you look out on the current course of action, we have a significant and growing imbalance between revenues and expenditures. i think that that is not to take away of this report. we have known for a long time when we publish our reports that that imbalance this. i think that what is hopefully new and useful about this document is more on the solution side. to say, look, i know that we have this problem and we will start thinking about the big pieces of addressing that. that being said, this chart here is an illustration of the problem. blue lines are projected revenues. redlines are expected expenditures. what this represents is sort of taking a look into the future given our current operation

mr. not so charismatic has been able to put out statements in the past few years, they have mostly served to annoy other radicals or unsuccessfully hitch al qaeda's wagon to other unrelated movements that don't want anything to do with him. "the new york times" reporting today mr. not so charismatic issued five recordings this year in which he tried to hitch the pro-democracy arab spring to 9/11 with zero success which is probably why he tried five times to do it. quote, mr. zawahri apologized in his message. the result of him being the home office nag everybody hates. brookings institute reporting today zawahri is most known in al qaeda for berating other groups like muslim brotherhood because they stray from the true path he follows. those groups never liked him anyway. mr. zawahri is widely believed to have ratted out the muslim brotherhood 30 years ago when he was in prison in egypt. a rat. we are all waiting to see what the u.s. will do with bin laden's hard drive. with the intel they collected from the house where they killed bin laden. maybe they'll be able to roll up al qaeda central. if he survives long enough to take over the reigns of al qae

mr. egypt and being on the run. from on the run, when he's been able to put out statements in the past few years, they have served to annoy other radicals to hitch al qaeda's wagonher unrelated movements that want nothing to do with him. "the new york times" says he issued five recordings with precisely zero success. it's probably why he tried five times to do it. he apologized for being behind the curve on developments in the arab world. a result of being on the run, he said. or maybe the result of being the home office nag whom everyone hates. brookings reporting that he is most known in al qaeda for berating other groups like egypt's muslim brotherhood because they stray from the true path he follows. he is widely believed to have ratted out the muslim brotherhood and others 30 years ago when he was in prison in egypt. a rat. i'm sure that's very popular in the ruthless international ter ris world. we are all waiting to see what the u.s. will do with the hard drive, the intel they collected from the house. maybe they will use it to roll up al qaeda central