mrs. wallace for hard work and our principal of those fine ask the mr. barnaby is here thank you, sir. >> in closing thank you, commissioner fewer for bringing this to the board clearly a strong message behind it and thank you to all the students for coming out tonight and now we'll move to roll call vote ms. casco. >> santa monica commissioner fewer mr. haney ms. mendoza-mcdonnell ms. norton mr. walton ms. wynns dr. murase 7 i's. >> (clapping) thank you very much. >> the next item on the agenda is item f public comment on consent calendar i have none item g the consent calendar i need a motion and second on the consent calendar. >> move the consent calendar arrest second. >> thank you. >> any items withdrawn or corrected by the superintendant. >> superintendant. >> yes. dr. murase two on page 92 should be marked non-retroactive and the dates changed to 2015 and next on page h 90 there the code should be placed the following words pending 2015-2016 budget approval. >> thank you, mr. steel any items removed for first reading by the board seeing none any i

mr. wallace and clark and [inaudible] they make it very clear t is a serious serious problem. all we want is to have the folks here deal in good faith, provide consultantss. i was wait frg a consultant to come 2 munts agoy and never showed up. a lot of misinformation here folks. a lot of misinformation and it makes me upset and i hope the city, the city gimpt does what is supposed to do under sequa and doesn't defer responsibility to protect not only mrs. mar, but all the people below. that is your duty. thank you >> thank you very much. okay, at this time colleagues this item is held and now closed and in the hand of the board of supervisors. so, supervisor christensen >> so, the one thing that i think we lugree on is that the stability of the cliffs in telegraph hill is critical. not only to the project sponsors property, not only to the project aopponent and also a number of residence that surround it. we have a history of cliff failures aroupds telegraph hill, not only is the rock there somewhat fragile but had quaury faces on the east side of the hell. i was sitting here

mr. chris wallace confronted marco rubio and his evolution on this issue.the problem though is not whether or not jeb bush or marco rubio are good at talking about this. whether them have figured out how to make sure they sound consistent as they answer it in different contexts and talking to different people about it. the problem is not skill here right? the problem is not whether these guys are good at answering the question. the larger problem is what is seen as the correct answer to this question. because while jeb bush and marco rubio have been getting in trouble on style points right for not exactly knowing what to say and for supposedly flubbing this answer these are the guy who have been judged by the beltsway media to be acing this question. >> i think it was a failure in many cases in the intelligence that was given to the president and congress at the time. >> knowing then what wenow now, no wmd in iraq, et cetera was that the right decision to go to war? >> no, it wasn't. now, i think president bush made the best decision he could at the time gi

mr. wallace, was as innocent as he initially claimed to be with no knowledge whatsoever about what occurred be the reason for him to change his story, anna not once but twice. because initially when he first talked to the police he told the police that he left the money on the porch but then you know what when the police later talked to him, he changed the story and he had is he -- he said he left the money in the garage. was it the porch or the garage? there's a number of inconsistencies with this guy's story. as an investigator we're going to take a close look at that. >> wallace apparently obsessed over the family's vehicles on social media, the range rover, getting to drive for them. is that something that can actually be used in an investigation, just somebody posting pictures of cars that they got to drive that they happen to like? >> oh, absolutely. we're going to definitely take a look at that and the investigators are definitely looking at that. you talk about the vehicle, which is really interesting and here's why. remember there was a picture or a video of someone leaving or runa

mr. stephanopoulos? >> yes i have asked for that i have not heard back, i got tough questions from chris wallace, i haveea but i have no problem with the tough questions or with stephanopoulos i did not give him a chance to respond and we didn't get a chance to talk about the content of the book and really he was trying to frame what the narrative should be and by the way that is the same narrative that the clinton campaign would use when they put out a two minute video just trying to discredit the book they were using him as the frame for that. and honestly this is the worst offense than brian williams. in this case he is going on late night high talkshows and it goes to the heart of these issues, you give them money as i pointed out, you spent a lot of time doing things for the clinton foundation, a massive conflict of interest i wrote something critical of that and he doesn't disclose it but he acts as if there's nothing to say. it's far worse in terms of credibility of journalism. >> in the answer to that question we had more opportunity to speak than the entire interview. >> congratulations on the

wallace, who ends up writing "ben hur." has nothing to do with this, just trivia. all of the prisoners with the exception of mrs.t and dr. mudd mudd -- dr. mudd have hoods over their head, which drives some of them to near-insanity. they obviously could not interview lee harvey oswald or john wilkes booth because they were dead. they try to interview everyone else. the trial lasted seven weeks. they interviewed 351 witnesses. the people in trial were hoping to uncover a larger conspiracy. they were hoping to prove the confederacy, particularly jefferson davis, was behind it. they were unable to do this. they were hoping to find that someone other than a deranged 26-year-old actor did this. when ultimately that did not work, just as after the kennedy assassination, worn commission -- the warren commission was commissioned. in 1867 the house of representatives convened a special assassination committee to see of the assassination trial had been correct, and came to the conclusion it had. when we discuss the kennedy assassination in three weeks, we will find it was the warren commission and in the house commission.