mr. wang's e-mail specifically says, the site permit, and i will not site the number. will be approved with revised plans that have been agreed upon by you and the developer assume that his name is troy or whatever. and the iten cal called the revised plans will be saved in the discretionary review docket for future records. i know what the staff is going to say this has no standing, i don't care if it has any standing or not, it is in the record it is what mr. wang sent back to the neighborhood and they have every reason to believe that the department would look at this and say this is what happened and we accept it. and now, i think that we should accept it and i am going to make a motion to take dr, and approve the original project that was filed back when mr. wang wrote this e-mail. >> agreements are made between private property owners and neighbors that result in the withdraw of a discretion review. because that agreement is made, that does not necessarily mean that the staff's position would have been to take the discretionary review, what it does is eliminates

and we entered into a good faith agreement and it was signed off by the planning department and mr. wang. i have made many improvements to my house over 40 years and i have always followed the process of a permit and it is seeums burdensome dealing with the city process but i respect the process and this is a density populated city. we have to have some way of doing these things. and i report the necessity for it so i am asking you to up hold the design request, and adhere to the original agreement, which we all entered into in good faith. thank you. >> thank you. >> >> my name is gary goal and i live on fair oaks street. i also sent in a letter which was aparently not noted in the planning department package that was on-line. but also a nearby neighbor that was involved in the discussions with the developer and the architect over

agreement and they withdraw the dr, plans will be submitted and it will be signed on, which is what mr. wang did in this scenario. in the future if a new plan is submitted we will review it and unless the recommendation were to come from this commission based on the actual dr that was held, a hearing, where the commission gaves specifics, we will always honor those and bring those back to the commission, with any future you know recommendation on any future dr that may occur on that property. >> okay. so on item 16 a, and 16 b at 68 procedio avenue which was a request for discretionary review which was withdrawn today. for whatever reason, if there was an agreement between the two parties, then, it holds for water with the city. >> even though the staff has encouraged the two parties to try to work it out. it does not prohibit the property owner in the future from submitting a permit that managed... >> that is not what i am talking about. i am talking about the integrity of the process. and the fact that the city is encouraging private agreements to be worked out on a discretionary review, t