mr. warnerermer. this was related to the permit that was pulled from 1993. the property while is shown fully on ms. unterberger's property. in fact, that is a wall which is shared by both buildings, between my two fingers here. this portion here is in fact solely on mr. wermer's property. the reason for that is that the description of the subdivision shows that the property line jogs inward to accomplish that beyond what we call the light well and lawrence calls the rear yard. this wall is entirely on the wermbeer property. it serves as the structural support for the work that was done on the first floor as well as the laundry shed, which is now identified -- which does not have the benefit of that list you saw. apparently, mr. paul has been able to come up with that since he was able to visit the site. that is certainly a step in the right direction. we are looking for an agreement. we are looking to work with ms. unterberger to solve this problem. but there is this wall which is solely on the wermer's property which she is using for structural support of t