mr. waxman what happens after the speech? will this in any way sway talks or block congress from a possible agreement? >> it is very unlikely. we know prime minister northwestern is a very eloquent speaker. we know that he's going to make a very powerful case against the agreement. there's really very little i think he's going to say that's likely to change the u.s. calculations in seeking an agreement with iran, in particular because although netanyahu does have some very letting concerns in the agreement that's rumored to be emerging the real flaw is he isn't presenting anything else, essentially he's just saying this is a bad agreement he isn't proposing or really hasn't proposed any other strategy. it is unlikely to change the obama administration's decision to go forward. whether it will change the vote in congress that remains to be seen. i think though it will have a probably beneficial impact for him in the israeli elections and as the previous guest said, that is no doubt very much in his mind as well. >> let me brin

mr. waxman saying, basically why, if it was to be a broader meaning didn't the drafters just say "by the" instead of "by the legislature"? >> brown: are there implication force other states, for other laws? >> absolutely. california has a commission very much like arizona's and two former republican governors are supporting the a- commission. they have been -- the arizona commission. they have been pleased with the outcome. there are about 11 states with something similar but not quite as arizona has done cutting the legislature completely out of the redistricting process. >> was there any discussion about the implications of gerrymandering or just the process. >> the process. the supreme court pretty much washed its hand of trying to decide if partisan germanderring violates the constitution. this was seen as one of the few checks on partisan gerrymandering. >> reporter: marcia coyle, "national law journal." >> my pleasure. >> ifill: on wednesday, the court will hear oral arguments in a case that goes to the heart of the affordable care act. at issue is whether the law bars the federal

20%, that could have been further enriched to make nuclear weapons, instead iran got rid of it >>> mr waxmanr thoughts on the report and what is at stake for israel? >> well i think what the report shows, which is significant is that there has been not merely a difference of interpretation between prime minister binyamin netanyahu, we have known that for some time that high ranking members. establishment had difficulty over whether the nuclear programme is under threat. this is a difference of fact. essentially what binyamin netanyahu said in his speech didn't accord with the facts as known by the israeli intelligence services. this is something that prime minister binyamin netanyahu should be asked about. more broadly, what had indicates is that prime minister binyamin netanyahu has for some time been single-minded in his focus, obsessive if you like on the issue. heap has often, let's say, been somewhat loose with the facts, in terms of talking about the danger or immediate si of the danger this is a problem he faces, he's seen as the boy that cries wolf. he warned of the imminence of a nu

mr. waxman? >> mr. chief justice, and may it please the court, the gravamen of the appellant's suit that they usurped the power of a legislative body they created both raises a claim that the framers would have been astonished to consider that federal district courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate and more fundamentally is simply misconceived misconceived. arizona defines its legislature in its constitution to include both the people and two representative bodies. an appellant's argument hinges on the premise that in drafting the elections clause the framers intended to ignore a state's definition of its own legislature. it is deeply inconsistent -- >> whatever a state kauld calls the legislature suffices uniter the federal constitution. is that right? >> the federal -- >> suppose the state says the courts are the legislature. will that zpies under the federal constitution? >> the federal -- justice scalia, the federal constitution by using the word legislature in connection with it's the uniform accep

mr. waxman. why ask men: mr. cheap -- waxman : we have before us a suit that the people -- both raises a claim that the framers would have been astonished to consider that federal district courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate and is misconceived. arizona defines its legislature in its constitution to include both the people and two representative bodies. the premise that in drafting the elections clause, the framers intended to ignore a state definition of its own legislature. it is deeply inconsistent -- scalia: whatever the state calls a legislature suffices under a federal constitution, is that right? waxman: by using the word legislature in connection with the accepted definition of that term in the founding generation. we cited both noah webster and simon johnson's dictionaries and it was understood that legislature meant the body that makes the law. scalia: give me one provision of the constitution that uses the term legislature that clearly was not meant to apply to the body of representatives of the peop

mr. waxman. waxman: we have before us a suit that the people -- both raises a claim that the framers would have been astonished to consider that federal district courts have jurisdiction to adjudicate and is misconceived. arizona defines its legislature in its constitution to include both the people and two representative bodies. in argument hinges on the premise that in drafting the elections clause, the framers intended to ignore a state definition of its own legislature. it is deeply inconsistent -- scalia: whatever the state calls a legislature suffices under a federal constitution, is that right? waxman: by using the word legislature in connection with the accepted definition of that term in the founding generation. we cited both noah webster and samuel johnson's dictionaries and it was understood that legislature meant the body that makes the law. scalia: give me one provision of the constitution that uses the term legislature that clearly was not meant to apply to the body of representativ