mr. wermer's property. the reason for that is that the description of the subdivision shows that the property line jogs inward to accomplish that beyond what we call the light well and lawrence calls the rear yard. this wall is entirely on the wermbeer property. it serves as the structural support for the work that was done on the first floor as well as the laundry shed, which is now identified -- which does not have the benefit of that list you saw. apparently, mr. paul has been able to come up with that since he was able to visit the site. that is certainly a step in the right direction. we are looking for an agreement. we are looking to work with ms. unterberger to solve this problem. but there is this wall which is solely on the wermer's property which she is using for structural support of the roof of her first floor. she has plumbing in that wall for her shower. it is our ball. we need to be able to work out some way of making that wall have some integrity on our side of the property. vice president go

mr. wermer's remodel. she wants to correct situations that exist on her property. she now has an nov to act on. that is what she is trying to act on. commissioner hwang: thank you. president peterson: mr. kornfield? >> i have only to add that in exhibit a, where it is talking about the location on property in the description of property, this is not the assessment for the reported property description. this is a property description put together and signed by the property owners. it may or may not reflect the actual property line of these buildings. president peterson: thank you. >> commissioners, the matter is before you. commissioner garcia: just to clarify the last remarks made by mr kornfield on exhibit a? it is the one in the july 15 submission? >> i am looking at the one that says june 24. that is a party agreement. commissioner garcia: thank you. commissionger fung: the convoluted nature of this particular case is actually quite complex. if you start with the original property descriptions, what is mentioned in those in terms of what is common is fairly limi