mr. wheeler: no. say that you have to maintain the content and you can't substitute commercials or put windows around it. one of the nice things about the process we go through is we specifically proposed some language and if that language is not good enough, tell us how to fix it. want google doing that. we respect privacy, these assets owned by programmers and the cable company. we are trying to follow the statutory mandate congress gave us. not, maybe think about this. l mandate saying consumers should have choices in terms of navigation devices they use. and the situation today is 90% of cable consumers don't have that choice. >> that is one of the final pillars, the set-top boxes. mr. wheeler: it was a key component. you want to have navigation device competition. point, on aat recent appearance before congress, you said there are competitive navigation devices available and opponents to your plan ran with that and said you were contradicting yourself. mr. wheeler: there are. and looko to best bu

mr. wheeler discusses how he views the future of telecom and the internet. he is joined by technology reporter for the washington post. involved,ble to be they were bringing great change to the american economy and the way people live their lives. that is what we are dealing with at the sec because we are dealing with one of the great revolutions of all time. our job is to say, ok, how do we deal with the kind of changes that are happening all around us as a result of the new technology? >> watch the communicators monday night at 8:00 eastern. >> each week, american history america" brings you archival films. ♪ >> beautification is far more than a matter of cosmetics. to me, it describes the whole effort to bring the natural world and the man-made world into harmony, to bring youthfulness, delight to our whole environment. ♪ on march 9, 1965 mrs. johnson said out the first azalea of the beautification program at the triangle between 3rd street in maryland and independence avenue southwest. of 1965, the committee met above -- aboard the uss sequoia to a tour

mr. wheeler, are there too many bents? >> i don't think that's the case.look at those two charts, there is one very important factor to bear in mind. the great benefit that jpmgan showed is they have a very strong retail banking business, an outstanding asset management business, an investment bank. obviously the weaker investment banking business was down 22% year on year, actual earnings down 7% because of the other businesses. deutsche doesn't have anything in the way of an investment bank in scaler profitability. tom: chris, you have been doing this for decades. why do we need so many banks? is it like pan american airlines -- just the national airline like lufthansa or british airways? why so many? >> >> we have had substantial consolidation. the u.k., partly down to the crisis. the u.s., and talking to bankers in the u.s., i think there is perhaps more scope, buffalo very big players. i think the answer is the regulators are very nervous about further consolidation, because they try to regulate the banks they now kind of understand rather than saying

mr. wheeler went on to write statistics and was widely praised for ruthlessly stripping away the jargon obfuscation to produce clear and entertaining explanations concepts to be far more obscure than they should be. i think it takes somebody very smart to make money seems a simple and charles wheelan process of starting with the absurdity of the whole premise of the little pieces of paper we obsess over and going on to look at the reason behind money, why money is good and why can go bad reading "naked money" is to see the economic patterns fall into place. it is time and the mechanisms upon which global financial system arrives under intense scrutiny and think the best thing we can do before we attack what the -- it's partners than it. we are fortunate that charles wheelan acidulated out for us. he paints a picture of the ex ordinary consensus which is money. just remember we realize how bizarre those crumpled pieces of paper in your wallet or we will swap it out for brand-new books. that's a pretty good deal. ladies and gentlemen, charles wheelan. [applause] >> thank you very much for coming out.

mr. wheeler also discusses how he views the future of telecom and the internet. he is joined by brian song, technology reporter for "the washington post." >> i was fortunate enough to be be involved as they were bringing great change to the american economy. and that's what we are dealing with at the fcc because we are now in the middle of one of the great revolutions of all time. fcc is ton the sec is to say say, how do we deal with the changes all around us

mr. wheeler also discusses how he views the future of telecom and the internet. he is joined by brian song, technology reporter for "the washington post." >> i was fortunate enough to be be involved as they were bringing great change to the american economy. and that's what we are dealing with at the fcc because we are now in the middle of one of the great revolutions of all time. fcc is ton the sec is to say say, how do we deal with the changes all around us as a result of technology? >> watch "the communicators," on c-span2. >> state department officials testified tuesday at a hearing of the senate foreign relations committee. they talked about recent actions of iran and the implementation of the nuclear agreement. this is about two hours. >> the foreign relations committee is called to order and thank you for testifying today. ambassador shannon, we appreciate your continued service to our country. we look forward to working with you. today, we are looking forward to hear your thoughts of the implementation of the jcpoa. and relations with iran. all of us have

mr. wheeler discusses how he views future of telecom and the internet. he's joined by brian fong, technology reporter for "the washington post." >> what i was fortunate enough to be able do in the cable industry and wireless industry was to be involved as they were bringing great change to the american economy and the way people lived their lives. and that's what we're dealing with at fcc, because we're now in the middle of one of great network revolutions of all time and the job of the fcc is to say, okay. how do we deal with the kind of changes that are happening all around us as a result of new technology? >> watch tonight 8:00 eastern on c-span 2. the brookings institutions recently host and event with former state department legal adviser harold koh. mr. koh criticized presidential candidates for suggesting use of waterboarding and carpet bombing calling tactics illegal. a panel discussion was held after his remarks. >> certainly more settled event here at brookings in comparison to the one we had yesterday maybe some of you -- i see a couple of hea

mr. wheeler also discusses how he views the future of telecom and the internet. by brian fong, technology reporter for the washington post. >> what i was fortunate enough to be able to do is be involved as they were bringing great change to the american economy. and that's what we're dealing with with the fcc because we are in the middle of one of the great revolutions of all time. >> watch the communicators tonight. >> newsmakers this week, mark warner is a democrat that serves on budget, financing, housing, urban affairs. thanks for being with us. let me introduce my guest. cq roll call focuses on the senate and his writing about congress. >> things for joining us today. position forunique a really hot button issue right now. a member of the select intelligence committee but you are a technologist by trade. interest in a deep that. there is a national debate about encryption. legislation, can you give us an update on that legislation and where you view the efforts? >> i think it will start to circulate in real time. the norm us respect for richard and diane. th

mr. trump is such a free wheeler, he is talking about starting a new -- >> so hillary is less bad is the t now. >> well, look, i mean, i am going to vote for secretary clinton over mr. trump, okay, and i think a lot of americans feel that way and if mr. trump loses in historic fashion in november as i hope he does i think it it's going to prompt a sole searching in the gop. i love the gop but why the standard there if their party is such an extremist who is turning off so many americans with these radical statements. >> joe, let's see if you can make a better case for trump than he did for hillary. because he really is against trump and not for hillary. so can you tell us why trump really should be the next president of the united states? >> well, this is not an endorsement, this is just a philosophical way i think. i think that, you know, we need to have less taxes, we need to have stuff like the death tax repealed and this is what trump is talking about. he's talking about a simplified tax code that reduces the amount of -- of levels in our tax system. you know, i look at somebody that,

wheeler. we'll be going in and out of mr. trump again. this is a stump speech one he has been railing against bad trade agreements and the like. if he addresses more to the crowd than the protest here's we'll take you back to that as well. and as well as reaction from a number of other todayses, john kashich campaigning, but not in california, and ted cruz, who had been in indianapolis, trying to shore up support for the 57 delegates up for grabs there but herman cane is joining us right now in stockbridge, georgia, herman, it's a right of american passage to protest these events. the fact that donald trump gets more than his fair share we should also point out, herman, that he also gets more than his fair share of attendees at events. they dwarf all other candidates, almost combined. but it's almost by design. >> it is by design. people have freedom of speech but they don't have freedom of violence, and they have thrown everything at donald trump except the kitchen sink. this is the kitchen sink,, in te form of violence don't believe thi

wheeler decided to do. they lost their independence and has gone down the path saying the internet is like an old phone uhle line and you heard my friend, mr. cramer, who was in the rate regulation business. he said the internet, it's not appropriate to regulate it as an old common carrier, like a monopoly because the internet is not a monopoly. we want competition which we know drives down people. when you have three people in america wanting to set the tes after the fact which was what would happen, they get to make the call, not consumers who say, you know, i kind of like that ben john thing. that's new and innovative. the chairman said, yeah, we let that go. we think that's ok. ah, that's the point. the chairman got to say we think that's ok. prior to title 2 regulation, the chairman didn't have a say in that. the marketplace did and the consumers could say, i don't like that, so i'm going to that carrier. another say, i'll offer you this. now it's going to get second guessed by a government, that will get more regulatory in its scope and scheme. finally, let me state, the argument raised early whier that somehow consumers could be hur

wheeler decided to do. they lost their independence and has gone down the path saying the internet is like an old phone uhle line and you heard my friend, mr. cramer, who was in the rate regulation business. he said the internet, it's not appropriate to regulate it as an old common carrier, like a monopoly because the internet is not a monopoly. we want competition which we know drives down people. when you have three people in america wanting to set the tes after the fact which was what would happen, they get to make the call, not consumers who say, you know, i kind of like that ben john thing. that's new and innovative. the chairman said, yeah, we let that go. we think that's ok. ah, that's the point. the chairman got to say we think that's ok. prior to title 2 regulation, the chairman didn't have a say in that. the marketplace did and the consumers could say, i don't like that, so i'm going to that carrier. another say, i'll offer you this. now it's going to get second guessed by a government, that will get more regulatory in its scope and scheme. finally, let me state, the argument raised early whier that somehow consumers could be hur