mr. winslow, could you just -- >> mr. winslow indicated is one-third or 500 square feet maximum or something like that but this is a little different. we're doing all the math. >> pull it forward here. >> please, mr. winslow. i will use the overhead. >> this is the outline proposed by commissioner moore as the roof deck. >> are you proposing that the front of it could move forward? >> yes, i would agree with mr. winslow it could move forward by two feet. that is still holding behin givt more area. >> chair m. marquez: is everybody ok with that? >> is that part of your motion, commissioner moore. >> yes, it is. >> second. did that also encloud your comments. >> >> roughly. >> there's a motion that has been second-degree. on the motion, reduce the roof deck allowing a two foot extension forward and on the third floor. mr. winslow, a question, is the motion in words explicit enough to the degree of reduction on the right side of the deck? i heard two feet but not the dough lynthedelineating commentt side. >> there was a diagr

mr. winslow, could you just -- >> mr. winslow indicated is one-third or 500 square feet maximum or something like that but this is a little different. we're doing all the math. >> pull it forward here. >> please, mr. winslow. i will use the overhead. >> this is the outline proposed by commissioner moore as the roof deck. >> are you proposing that the front of it could move forward? >> yes, i would agree with mr. winslow it could move forward by two feet. that is still holding behin givt more area. >> chair m. marquez: is everybody ok with that? >> is that part of your motion, commissioner moore. >> yes, it is. >> second. did that also encloud your comments. >> >> roughly. >> there's a motion that has been second-degree. on the motion, reduce the roof deck allowing a two foot extension forward and on the third floor. mr. winslow, a question, is the motion in words explicit enough to the degree of reduction on the right side of the deck? i heard two feet but not the dough lynthedelineating commentt side. >> there was a diagr

mr. winslow, could you just -- >> mr. winslow indicated is one-third or 500 square feet maximum or something like that but this is a little different. we're doing all the math. >> pull it forward here. >> please, mr. winslow. i will use the overhead. >> this is the outline proposed by commissioner moore as the roof deck. >> are you proposing that the front of it could move forward? >> yes, i would agree with mr. winslow it could move forward by two feet. that is still holding behin givt more area. >> chair m. marquez: is everybody ok with that? >> is that part of your motion, commissioner moore. >> yes, it is. >> second. did that also encloud your comments. >> >> roughly. >> there's a motion that has been second-degree. on the motion, reduce the roof deck allowing a two foot extension forward and on the third floor. mr. winslow, a question, is the motion in words explicit enough to the degree of reduction on the right side of the deck? i heard two feet but not the dough lynthedelineating commentt side. >> there was a diagr

mr. winslow, could you just -- >> mr. d is one-third or 500 square feet maximum or something like that but this is a little different. we're doing all the math. >> pull it forward here. >> please, mr. winslow. i will use the overhead. >> this is the outline proposed by commissioner moore as the roof deck. >> are you proposing that the front of it could move forward? >> yes, i would agree with mr. winslow it could move forward by two feet. that is still holding behin givt more area. >> chair m. marquez: is everybody ok with that? >> is that part of your motion, commissioner moore. >> yes, it is. >> second. did that also encloud your comments. >> >> roughly. >> there's a motion that has been second-degree. on the motion, reduce the roof deck allowing a two foot extension forward and on the third floor. mr. winslow, a question, is the motion in words explicit enough to the degree of reduction on the right side of the deck? i heard two feet but not the dough lynthedelineating commentt side. >> there was a diagram submitted int

mr. winslow, a question, is the motion in words explicit enough to the degree of reduction on the right side of the deck? i heard two feet but not the dough lynthedelineating commentt side. >> there was a diagram submitted into the record by mr. winslow that i believe he will use to address that. >> that would suffice otherwise the wordings does not express what we're saying. thank you. so moved, that passion passes 6 will have 0. >> thank you. >> we're adjourned. evening. we are now called to order. roll col, please. [roll call] >> thank you. >> section a general information. there's number one is accessibility information for the public. two propose changes to the agenda tonight. on february 25th, 2020, the mayor london breed declared a local emergency to prepare for a possible outbreak. the san francisco department of public-health has subsequently announced recommendations to reduce the spread of covid-19 in that san francisco the city has blocked all non essential public gathering at city-owned facility and recommended that large conferences and gatherings be minimized for the next two