mr. winslow, mr. sanchez, and everybody else trying to explain to us what is in front of us.we cannot even properly read the drawings. to expect every professional in town and make a reasonable effort to get things in front of us which are understandable. this plan is not understandable the. i want to support this project, but i believe that if there are comprises made and to be reflected in t drawing and that is proper, consistent dimension strength and the dimension strengths in front of me that will meander and give instructions to the applicant and come back with the revising and i have to stick to some principle and which we accept in front of us and this is not making the muster. >> an i do find it quite problematic in terms of intensification and noncompliant and would be goo if there is a continuance for the two parties to come together and to come back with a revised drawing so the commissioners and the commission can properly look at this project appropriately. in that note, i would like to make a motion to continue this project. >> for how long, commissioner imperi

mr. winslow -- there you go, sir. your time is running, you have four minutes. >> good evening, commissioner, and thank you for your time. my name is jordan kwan. i'm here to oppose the rear extension portion of the project. as you can see, without the extension, there's plenty of light, and it's open to my yard. if the extension is to be allowed, it will severely affect the amount of light and the usage on our yard. can you please go to slide 1. with the simulated extension shown, the amount of light to my planning area will be very limited. in addition, the extension bedroom is very close by. it's a privacy concern. i believe this extension is not in line with the design guidelines which normally have a set back, and it's not compatible with the neighborhood because there is no legal living extension structure on this side. i do have a porch, but the porch is just very open, as you can see. can you go to slide three, please. all the neighbor -- attending neighbors during the neighborhood meeting, they have opposed a

mr. winslow, could you elaborate on that? you are originally the one confronted with this issue. personally consider this addition not very impacting and would like to hear your thoughts on loss of light within measures that we have discussed on other projects. >> sure. thanks. yeah. i think with any development, there's always a change that will be impacting some existing condition whether that be light or privacy or some visual impacts. the question that we ask ourselves is, is it too much? is it -- in this case, it's not too much. it's a modest addition. there's still plenty of light that's accessing both the individual widows in question and the overall demonstration of the building, front, side, and rear. so negligible impact of this was determined to not be a factor that required staff requesting modification based on the implementation of guidelines. >> i appreciate your comment because i would have concluded that given this that is an exposure that has both sun and then unimpeded western exposure as the sun comes around, i think there will be sufficient light to not put t