SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
32
32
Jul 17, 2021
07/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 32
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. winslow is not an idea to put broader -- i think we need to give room to not expect that mr. winslow will not the resolver of all d.r. issues now and forever, so i believe that our policy regarding d.r.s has to be solid and stand-alone, aside from us enjoying the benefit and skill of mr. winslow, and i think we need to be very clear about that because policy goes beyond individuals who are currently helping us to ease our own work on that subject matter. i was very interested hearing mr. patterson speak about rebuttal and due process as much as the rebuttal often seems representative, it does allow for certain small clothing arguments, which i believe we should consider and actually have our city attorney help us weigh-in on what it means relative to the due process question. i'll just let that hangout there without trying to have an opinion on it, because i don't. >> clerk: commissioner moore, if that concludes your comments, there is a member of the public requesting to speak. should we do so now? >> vice president moore: please do so. >> clerk: go ahead, caller. >> give me
mr. winslow is not an idea to put broader -- i think we need to give room to not expect that mr. winslow will not the resolver of all d.r. issues now and forever, so i believe that our policy regarding d.r.s has to be solid and stand-alone, aside from us enjoying the benefit and skill of mr. winslow, and i think we need to be very clear about that because policy goes beyond individuals who are currently helping us to ease our own work on that subject matter. i was very interested hearing mr....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
44
44
Jul 17, 2021
07/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. winslow. >> second. >> secretary: okay. if there's no further deliberation, there's a motion to take dr with the project with modifications. on that motion, [roll call] so moved commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 5-0 and concludes your hearing today. i will just give you a heads up, the next two hearings will not be this short. i expect them both to be very lengthy before your summer hiadus break. enjoy your evening and we'll see you soon. >> thank you so much. >> bye bye. >> : commissioner john burton.w. commissioner gilman. we're missing commissioner burton or commissioner -- >> : since we don't have a quorum, we won't be able to start the meeting. she is on mute but we do have her. >> : now, madam president, you do have a quorum. item two is the approval of minutes. >> : so moved. >> : i second. >> : thank you. we have a motion and a second. may i please have a roll call vote. >> : (roll call). >> : motion passes unanimously. the minutes are adopted. >> : item no. 3 is the pledge of allegiance. item number fou
mr. winslow. >> second. >> secretary: okay. if there's no further deliberation, there's a motion to take dr with the project with modifications. on that motion, [roll call] so moved commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 5-0 and concludes your hearing today. i will just give you a heads up, the next two hearings will not be this short. i expect them both to be very lengthy before your summer hiadus break. enjoy your evening and we'll see you soon. >> thank you so much....
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
40
40
Jul 31, 2021
07/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 40
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. winslow, mr. patterson, you have three minutes. >> good afternoon, commissioners.s is 1 ventura a i was hoping not to be here today as i've always been able to reach compromise. we have melt with the sponsor and made compromise proposals and we have not received back to our home and we hope modest compromise will service all parties about it and we're hope you will help with that process. >> good afternoon, commissioners, this is ryan patterson. and if we can please have slide one. and i'm unable to see it. it looks like, there we go. ok. the cottage was not identified during environmental review and as a result, the historic impacts were not properly mitigate. building may even be individually eligible except for the project sponsor's own substantial unpermitted alterations. these historic features should be restored not ignored in further degraded. this is a series oversight. the cottages height was identified as a character defining feature in the h.r.e. yet the project would increase the height and mass destroying the charter defining feature and substantially
mr. winslow, mr. patterson, you have three minutes. >> good afternoon, commissioners.s is 1 ventura a i was hoping not to be here today as i've always been able to reach compromise. we have melt with the sponsor and made compromise proposals and we have not received back to our home and we hope modest compromise will service all parties about it and we're hope you will help with that process. >> good afternoon, commissioners, this is ryan patterson. and if we can please have slide...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
37
37
Jul 10, 2021
07/21
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. jong's unwillingness to discuss anything with the neighbors was right before the discretionary review. david winslow from the planning commission had offered to facilitate a meeting between mr. jong and myself to negotiate a design that would facilitate everyone's concerns and interests, and again, mr. jong rejected an opportunity to meet. most importantly, mr. jong started work on the project without a permit, and the work was only stopped when the formal notice of violation was issued by the city after numerous neighbors had reported the violation. mr. jong would have continued to work without a permit had no one complained about this. i also want to note that mr. jong is incorrect when he claims that i am the only person who is against stopping this project. i have no issues with the project being built, i just want it to be consistent with the other builds on this block. other neighbors have commented that they would like change to see this permit. as -- changes to this permit. my neighbor submitted a petition on this project on this street that would like to see this permit modified, and it's m
mr. jong's unwillingness to discuss anything with the neighbors was right before the discretionary review. david winslow from the planning commission had offered to facilitate a meeting between mr. jong and myself to negotiate a design that would facilitate everyone's concerns and interests, and again, mr. jong rejected an opportunity to meet. most importantly, mr. jong started work on the project without a permit, and the work was only stopped when the formal notice of violation was issued by...