mr. winslow and mr. page can independent to the level or lack thereof professionals prep and reviewing and submit a history that commissioner moore was peeking to. the deals with the process unfolding what was done wrong approximate to rekt foil this mr. page appropriated of involved with and appropriated a details time line of what has gone of you can explain where this would go from here in terms of the next steps if this project were to be approved presented today? >> sure. the permit before you is the permit to abate the violation. work started without permits planning was not involved when this happened. i'm the enforcement planner and the staff person pressing the permit to abate. had i came enemy, it was the allegation a lot of work without permits there was one filed without plans that under which i think the on or about everoriginal contractor did the w this permit was not routed to planning. there was a per mist with plans routed to plan and that one was revoked. at the board of appealless. it

mr. winslow and mr. page can independent to the level or lack thereof professionals prep and reviewing and submit a history that commissioner moore was peeking to. the deals with the process unfolding what was done wrong approximate to rekt foil this mr. page appropriated of involved with and appropriated a details time line of what has gone of you can explain where this would go from here in terms of the next steps if this project were to be approved presented today? >> sure. the permit before you is the permit to abate the violation. work started without permits planning was not involved when this happened. i'm the enforcement planner and the staff person pressing the permit to abate. had i came enemy, it was the allegation a lot of work without permits there was one filed without plans that under which i think the on or about everoriginal contractor did the w this permit was not routed to planning. there was a per mist with plans routed to plan and that one was revoked. at the board of appealless. it

mr. winslow read social security the looking at the drawings i believe. >> right. where the lines are drawn is indicative of ping spaces. the striping is not actually where the striping is today. so the measurements this mr. winslow is quoting are of if you were to go and take a tame measure and measure them. those are the measurements. >> this is a reupon striped condition as drawn. the stroiping in the drawing system just indicative there stroiping there. not to show that is exact low where the painted stripes are. >> yea. in a way so with those stripings the changes the rent board made -- in terms of the -- there are 3 attentives people sdwablts and so i'm trying to the image visualize in the blueprint we have in here in terms of their accessibility. i'm not sure if we can victim updated blueprint with the sizes mentioned during the rent board decision on the rent board hearing the argument there is in the much reduction that is not when we have in front of us. are you looking at the sheet a? 110p? yes. this is the a future conditionful some have p space differe

mr. winslow read social security the looking at the drawings i believe. >> right. where the lines are drawn is indicative of ping spaces. the striping is not actually where the striping is today. so the measurements this mr. winslow is quoting are of if you were to go and take a tame measure and measure them. those are the measurements. >> this is a reupon striped condition as drawn. the stroiping in the drawing system just indicative there stroiping there. not to show that is exact low where the painted stripes are. >> yea. in a way so with those stripings the changes the rent board made -- in terms of the -- there are 3 attentives people sdwablts and so i'm trying to the image visualize in the blueprint we have in here in terms of their accessibility. i'm not sure if we can victim updated blueprint with the sizes mentioned during the rent board decision on the rent board hearing the argument there is in the much reduction that is not when we have in front of us. are you looking at the sheet a? 110p? yes. this is the a future conditionful some have p space differe

mr. winslow can inform you further on the thorough preservation review that michelle from the preservation team completed. thank you. commissioners. project is before you. of thank you. i certainly. the project was reviewed proper low with policy and the historic preservation review seemed to be appropriate and the,dition is immediatest i don't see exceptional circumstances related to the project. commissioner koppel and commissioner imperial. >> make a notion support staff's recommendation. >> second. >> commissioner mor? >> i would like to have mr. wins loam explain one more time why no hre was required and regarding the windows. it is interesting to read the partial preservation report it was informtive and hope you find closure to that matter we want to make sure this building falls within all of the guidelines that apply and restate them it would make it comfortable for all of us particular low the commission supports the justification of historic district. thereupon is nobody stepping out of line >> so. this is an age eligible building. has not been determined whether an historic res

mr. winslow on two different occasions before it came to the commission. mr. was very conflicted. first he told he he was not going to recommend taking discretionary review and the second discussion, he said, it's a close call, and i'm going to recommend there be a site setback. and ms. watti explained and they had extensive discussions internally and there was a long discussion and they showed there was no shadow impacts. the snippets you saw there are just that. snippets taken out of context. there was a long discussion as to specifically what ms. watti was going to say at the planning commission hearing, i didn't have any advanced discussion with her. no. >> thank you. >> thank you. you can be seated. we will now hear from the planning department. >> thank you, planning department. the department recognize any change big or small can result in change to some neighbors. with regard to 264 diamond street, the department does not believe it will cause significant impact to the neighbors. the addition is modest in size and will not extend beyond the rear yard.

mr. winslow said it isn't totally out of character for surrounding homes. there is a variety of home heights here and i think as this commission knows this is more density that we'll be seeing and happy to see rh property with two units in it, so that's a nice project to see, so i-i don't support the dr requester because there was agreement made, i think we should take dr to approve the modification of the rear deck of the two feet retraction of the rear. commissioner koppel. >> so moved. >> second. >> very good. there is a motion seconded to take dr and approve the project with the modification pursuant to the agreement between one of the dr requesters and the project sponsor reducing the deck two feet. on the motion- [roll call] >> could you add the word south side of the deck and then i say aye. >>ia gree to that. the west side of the deck. >> the south side, correct? >> west. the west side. >> west side? >> for clarity, why don't- >> you the adjoining side. >> north is up in the diagram so the left side. >> sorry. >> sfgovtv, can we have the overhead, p