mr. winslow is facilitating. so it's not atypical here to have a doctor that's effectively resolved between parties through sort of an in-person communication. however if mr. winslow contacted the applicant not twice and the doctor requested twice, and it's basically not it's not being responded to, i find that in there is missing information here not being here and basically not responding to mr. winslow's request. please me wondering. i am i am not an attorney. i'm not trying to hold us off. i find the agreement or the basis for an agreement reasonable and correct. however, i would like to personally not be stuck that this person could ultimately come up with something else, particularly there seem to be a breakdown in communication, but the items before you, you have you can take the agreement that mr. winslow said the project sponsor offered. you cannot take it if you don't want to. you can just approve the project as proposed and that's code compliant. or you can do something different. but the request is no