wong could not answer a simple question about the definition of abuse from congressman gatti, this question came about. i hope mr. cordray would be willing to engage in that discussion today and get some clarity. with such immense powers over financial products left her interpretation of a single annie let it, unaccountable bureaucrat with over half a billion dollars budget, furthermore being done with a recess appointment. republican senate body and in the senate have called for meaningful exchanges to the structure of the cfpb. unfortunately the president decided against compromise. if having a regulator with unprecedented ill-defined power was not enough, the administration decided to double down they bring into question the validity of its direct here. that is unfortunate. the fact that white house lawyers must continue to justify the president's decision to waive roughly 200 years of precedent, jeopardize the sanctity of the beers operations and is unfair, in my opinion, to mr. cordray, but bureau, it's powerful responsibilities and duties, and most importantly the american public. the irony for this to occ