mr. woolsey, what could the u.s. doing that would be more aggressive than what president obama is doing to fight isis and other terrorists? mr. woolsey: as of now, we are playing a game, as if we were the hockey goalie. any shot on net in the whole season gets through our catching it, we lose everything. we have to do a better job of getting inside the heads of our enemies. one thing is to call them for what they are, jihadi, islamist terrorists, and not to mince words the way the president does , all the time. you can't work effectively on something you can't even talk about. the other is, i think to take notice of the fact that we are going to have to make serious compromises. we all want our privacy. we also all want security. in a normal, average pleasant day in the united states and other parts of the world security and privacy don't , really clash that much. but when you get attacked, particularly by an institution as ruthless as isis, they do begin to clash. what we have to do is essentially develop a public-p

mr. woolsey: as of now, we are playing a game, as if we were the hockey goalie.et in the whole season tickets through our --ching it we lose anything, everything. we have to do a better job of getting in the heads of the enemy. one thing is to call them for what they are, jihadi, islamist terrorists, and not to. mince words the way the president does all the time .you can't work effectively on something you can't even talk about. i think to take notice of the fact that we are going to have to make serious compromises. we all want our privacy.we also all want security in a normal, average pleasant day in the united states and other parts of the world. security and privacy don't really clash that much. but when you get attacked, particularly by an institution as ruthless as isis, they do begin to clash. what we have to do is essentially about a public by the partnership -- public-private partnership, said that people in the government that are real experts on data, from the data industry that are very good at pulling together information on people from publicly ava

mr. woolsey, in politico this week, several senior intelligence officials are quoted as saying, in many ofousands of counter terrorism cases the fbi invest gaths a year, what determines who is merely aspirational and who might someday be operational is often just an agent's or squad's intuition. in your experience, sir, is that accurate? is there not a better way to tell precisely who might be a risk? >> i think it's tough. it is a little bit like telling who is lying on a polygraph. some people give an indication they are physically. others it kind of comes down to reading their body stance and so forth on behalf of the polygraph op pore ray to opper ray tore. it may be somewhat like that. this is hard work. it is not work the cia is usually involved in. again, i say i take my hat off to the bureau for working hard on something like this even if they missed it. i must also say that those signals that you described sounded like something that someone should have checked out. whether it should have been the bureau or local law enforcement, i don't know. >> director woolsey, i'm curious what

lynn woolsey for her service and let's urge all members of congress to approach our work with the same tenacity and resolve to work together toward peace, health, and security for all. thank you, mr. speaker. i yield back. . the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back his time. for what purpose does the gentlelady from tennessee seek recognition? mrs. black: mr. speaker, pursuant to house resolution 767, i call up house concurrent resolution 89, expressing the sense of congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the united states economy and ask for its immediate consideration. the speaker pro tempore: the clerk will report the title concurrent resolution. the clerk: house concurrent resolution 89, concurrent resolution expressing the sense of congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the united states economy. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to house resolution 767, the concurrent resolution is considered as read. the concurrent resolution shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the committee on ways and means. the gentlewoman from tennessee, mrs. black, and the gentleman from michigan, m