71
71
Nov 18, 2014
11/14
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> guest: mr. wu you mention verizon and the rules. weather now whenever the fcc does will end up in court will be a key question here and of course you are an expert on this. a proposal that we reported they were close to a something they're requested impart an idea you suggested this idea of a hybrid reclassification. can you explain what you think the practical differences would be between that sort of solution and what the president calls for? >> guest: frankly my opinion, i didn't happen to think and there are those who disagree with me that the differences would be that great. it is probably true that the president's approach, it's true that the president's approach is a little more straightforward and slightly higher likelihood of surviving in court. i think those are the main advantages. it also creates a long-term possibility of a universal service for broadband. there are two approaches on the table. i personally thought they were both okay but the president had gone to the more straightforward old-school approach of what is
. >> guest: mr. wu you mention verizon and the rules. weather now whenever the fcc does will end up in court will be a key question here and of course you are an expert on this. a proposal that we reported they were close to a something they're requested impart an idea you suggested this idea of a hybrid reclassification. can you explain what you think the practical differences would be between that sort of solution and what the president calls for? >> guest: frankly my opinion, i...
76
76
Nov 17, 2014
11/14
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 76
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> mr. wu, so you mentioned verizon and the rules. whether or not whatever the fcc does will stand up in court seems to be a key question here and, of course, you're an expert on this. >> guest: yeah. >> the proposal we reported they were close to was something that reflected, i think, in part an idea you suggested, this hybrid reclassification. can you explain what you think the practical differences would be between that sort of solution and what the president called for? >> guest: frankly, my opinion, i didn't happen to think -- now, there are those that disagree with me -- that the differences would be that great. it is probably true that the president's approach -- it is true the president's approach a little more straightforward and has a slightly higher likelihood of surviving in court. i think those are its main advantages. it also creates a long-term possibility of like a universal service fund for broadband. there were two approaches on the table. i personally thought they were both okay, but the president has gone for the m
. >> mr. wu, so you mentioned verizon and the rules. whether or not whatever the fcc does will stand up in court seems to be a key question here and, of course, you're an expert on this. >> guest: yeah. >> the proposal we reported they were close to was something that reflected, i think, in part an idea you suggested, this hybrid reclassification. can you explain what you think the practical differences would be between that sort of solution and what the president called for?...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
31
31
Nov 15, 2014
11/14
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
mr. jonas raising his and bro we're not taking dr but as proposed again commissions commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wuo moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on general public comment i have two speaker cards. >> mr. harvey lane and evangeli evangelist. >> how you doing commissioners first of all, we're asked to speak with da on afraid and corruption this will be directed at those things there and also speaking about mr. obama this is towards him with fraud and corruption you leave out a lot of people in hunters point and potrero hill they're moving this is the problem and also seeing i've been with san francisco housing for 24 years and i'm having trouble in getting any retirement all i have is one more year and because i took off in '06 and 07 because they were shooting and till e killing people in sunnydale they don't
mr. jonas raising his and bro we're not taking dr but as proposed again commissions commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner fong commissioner president wuo moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on general public comment i have two speaker cards. >> mr. harvey lane and evangeli evangelist. >> how you doing commissioners first of all, we're asked to speak with da on...
51
51
Nov 25, 2014
11/14
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 51
favorite 0
quote 0
there's little about full beards and whether they're dangerous, wu the 40 states permit that the state would have a difficult burden of proof. >>> mr. laycock, the problem i have with your client's claim of religious requirement is the religious requirement is that he grow a full beard, isn't it? now, let's assume i'm in a religion that requires polygamy. i mean, could i say to the prison, well, you know, okay, i won't have three wives, just let me have two wives. you know, you're still violating your religion it seems to me if he allows his beard to be clipped to one inch, isn't he? >> the religious teaching is a full beard. he testified that religiously half an inch is better than nothing and he explained that in terms of something he referenced. he's in a difficult situation. i don't think he should be penalized for being reasonable. he offered an extremely conservative compromise. >> religious beliefs aren't reasonable. they're categorical. god tells you. it's not a matter of being reasonable, god being reasonable. he's supposed to have a full beard. >> he's supposed to have a full beard, but a partial beard is better than none
there's little about full beards and whether they're dangerous, wu the 40 states permit that the state would have a difficult burden of proof. >>> mr. laycock, the problem i have with your client's claim of religious requirement is the religious requirement is that he grow a full beard, isn't it? now, let's assume i'm in a religion that requires polygamy. i mean, could i say to the prison, well, you know, okay, i won't have three wives, just let me have two wives. you know, you're...