mr. wulf, i do appreciate that there is a big undertaking, and you quote the number of 44,000 screens and other kinds of things. i think there had been some significant accomplishment in the form of beginning recognition, particularly by many in the industry, about the desire to try to regulate -- not regulate -- to identify and oversee the presence of these chemicals, the dangerous chemicals, and, quite frankly, i think you would we the first to admit you have a lot of great cooperation from many of the folks in the industry, and they're looking for more followup, having already taken great steps, made great investments. they're looking for the kind of timely followup on the efforts you have already undertaken with these top screens. i'm a little concerned by testimony mr. caldwell presented in his written testimony -- and if i'm correct, mr. caldwell, you're talking about estimates just to continue to do some of these oversights, of anywhere from seven to nine more years before' even complet

let me say, mr. wulf, that i do appreciate there is a big undertaking, and you quote the numbers of 44,000 top screens and other kinds of things. and i think there had been some significant accomplishment in the form of the beginning, recognition, particularly by many in the industry, about the desire to try to regulate -- not regulate -- to identify and versee the presence of these chemicals, the dangerous chemicals. you have great cooperation from many of the folks in the industry and they're looking for more follow-up having already taken great steps, made gret investments. they're looking for the kind of timely follow-up on the efforts that you've already undertaken with these top screens. i am concerned about testimony that mr. caldwell presented in his written testimony -- and if i'm correct, mr. caldwell, you're talking about estimates just to continue to do some of these cfats oversights of anywhere from seven to nine more years before it could even e completed with this process. seven to nine mor