supervisor mar: ;mr. yarne, can you explain this? >> yes, and a lot is what not to do. i think an important theme is, we have heard in public comment, that the embassy suites opened the city up to risk, and we feel is the opposite. they let us know what not to do, and what not to do is to not clarified in the agreement you have with the developer, so in this case, like i said, we are offering specific concessions, the density bonuses, the height and bulk changes, and so it is a contract between the city and the developer for mutual benefit, in what palmer pointed out is it was not clear in that case what the developer was getting for those restrictions on their inclusionary rent control units, so we essentially learned from that. it is the same strategy we're using, by the way, for all of our inclusionary rental units in the city of san francisco today. we're using the development agreement process, and we are offering a specific exceptions or incentives, so again, i think the polymer case is important to emphasize. it points out what not to do. in a way, it was actuall