mr. budd will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lawson of florida, mr. doyle of pennsylvania, mr. davis of illinois, and ms. demmings of florida, they all vote yes on senate 1942. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, i inform the house that ms. salazar will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from california seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mike thompson of california, gomez, scott peters, bobby rush, mr. grijalva of arizona, these members will vote yes on h.r. 1942. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. buchanan of florida, i inform the house that mr. buchanan will vote nay. as the member designated by mr. baird and mrs. spartz, i inform the house tha

mr. gibbs will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from nevada seek recognition? mr. horsford: as the member designated by mr. meeks, i inform the house that mr. meeks will vote yes on the swefntions en bloc -- on the swefntions en bloc number 2 -- on the suspensions en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? mr. correa: madam speaker, as the member designated by congress members gonzalez, newman, roybal-allard, cardenas, swalwell, ryan, levin and barragan, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the suspensions en bloc number 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from pennsylvania seek recognition? >> as the member designated by representative axne, i inform the house that representative axne will vote yes on the suspensions en bloc 2. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? mr. neguse: madam speaker, as the mem

mr. issa will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? mr. pappas: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. axne, mr. o'halleran, mrs. bustos, ms. kuster, ms. lee of nevada, -- miss lee of nevada, mr. lynch, mr. krishnamoorthi, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on s. 5168. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. turner of ohio, i inform the house that mr. turner will vote yea on s. 5168. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? mr. kildee: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. neal of massachusetts, i inform the house that mr. neal will vote yes on s. 5168. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. miller-meeks, i inform the house that mrs. miller-meeks will

mr. dunn yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. moore, mr. lewan mr. lowenthal, these members will vote yes on s.3875. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from idaho seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mike simpson of idaho's 2nd district, i inform the house that mr. simpson will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. pressley, mr. grijalva and mrs. beatty, they will vote yes on s.3875. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from south carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. jeff duncan of south carolina, i inform the house that mr. duncan will vote yes on passage of 3875. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. kildee, mr. gottheimer

mr. ray: yes. mr. huizenga: how about southern district of new york? mr. ray: yes. mr. huizenga: i'll get to a couple of practical questions because i think these were the things i was going to ask you. and also ask mr. bankman-fried. in your declaration you said the quote, f.t.x..com platform was not available to u.s. users, close quote, earlier this month cftc chairman suggested in testimony before the senate agriculture committee that 2% of funds housed at ftx.com were from u.s. individuals. confirm whether there were u.s. individuals or persons, customers of ftx.com? mr. ray: yes. we found there is a small number of u.s. customers that had engaged -- mr. huizenga: is 2% small? less or more. mr. ray: we don't have those numbers on an investor bay sis we have it on a customer basis. less than a couple hundred. mr. huizenga: it could amount to billions. billions of dollars that was in there. at least it could be millions or hundreds of thousands we don't know that number or do we? mr. ray: i don't know that number. billions would sound -- mr. huizenga: you mentioned th

mr. gonzales will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> as the member designated by ms. porter, ms. pressley, ms. hayes and mrs. beatty, they will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from idaho seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mike simpson, idaho's 2nd district, i inform the house that mr. simpson will vote yes. as the member designated by mr. bill johnson, i inform the house that mr. johnson will vote yes on senate bill 1617. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, mr. sires, mr. payne, ms. titus and mr. pascrell, they will vote yes on s.1617. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from indiana seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. baird of indiana, i inform the house that mr. baird will vote yes on s.1617. the speaker pro tempore: for what pu

mr. ruppersberger will vote yes on s. 1466. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cawthorn of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. cawthorn will vote aye on the measure. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from oklahoma seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. lucas of oklahoma, i inform the house that mr. lucas will vote yea on s. 1466. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. meng of new york, pursuant to house resolution 8, i inform the house that ms. meng will vote yea on s. 1466. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? flesch fleesh mr. speaker, as the member designated by -- fliesh fliesh mr. speaker -- mr. fleischmann: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. palazzo, mr. long, these members will all vote yea on s. 1466.

mr. lahood will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. krishnamoorthi in a moore think and mr. larson and mrs. axne, they will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from north carolina seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. hudson of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. hudson will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady ohio seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. mccorm ac, she will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. ferguson of georgia, i inform the house that mr. ferguson will vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: as the member designated by mrs. kirkpatrick, mr. sires, bill pascrell, andy kim, peter defazio and donald payne, i inform

mr. ray: yes. rep. huizenga: southern district of new york? mr. ray: rep. huizenga: yes. rep. huizenga:rep. huizenga: i'm going to get to a couple of practical questions because these are the things i was going to ask you and then asked mr. bankman-fried. in your declaration, you said that the ftx.com platform is not available to u.s. users, however, earlier this month, the chairman suggested in testimony before the senate agriculture committee that 2% of funds housed at ftx.com were from u.s. individuals. and you confirm whether there were u.s. individuals or persons , in fact, customers of ftx.com? mr. ray: we found that there was a small number of u.s. customers that had engaged in -- rep. huizenga: his 2% small in your estimation? mr. ray: we don't have those kind of numbers on investor basis, we have it on a customer basis. we are talking about less than a couple hundred. rep. huizenga: but it could amount to billions. or at least it could be millions or hundreds of thousands. do you know that number? mr. ray: i don't know that number. billions would sound very very -- rep

mrs. fletcher of texas all vote yes. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from michigan seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. moolenaar of michigan, i inform the house that mr. moolenaar will vote nay on h.r. 2617. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by representative sanchez, i inform the house that representative sanchez will vote yes on h.r. 2617. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. salazar of florida, mr. waltz of florida, i inform the house that they will both be voting no on h.r. 2617. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia seek recognition? mr. beyer: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cart mr. cartwright of pennsylvania, ms. porter, mr. kind, dr. bera, dr. lowenthal, mr. desaulnier, mr. blumenauer, ms. pingree, mri in

mr. rush will vote yes on h.res. 1518. e speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by ms. pressley and mrs. beatty, i inform the house that and the speaker from laredo that these two members will vote yes on h.res. 1518. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by congress members marie newman, adriano espaillat, and marilyn strickland, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on h.res. 1518. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida seek recognition? >> as the member designated by dr. dunn of florida, i inform the house that dr. dunn will vote no on the rule. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. larson of connecticut, mr. o'halleran, mrs. dingell, mrs. axne and mr. krishnamoorthi, i inform th

mr. verrilli: yes. so the dodson case came up with my friend on the other side, i think, or maybe with mr. katyal, but i should talk about that for minute. you know, to say that the partisan gerrymandering analysis in that, i mean, it was a flea on the tail of a d when you rat opinion, that was a case about racial gerrymandering. ninetypercent of the opinion is about it. the parties threw in this of offhand argument in their opinbrief that said, well, there's also a problem here in that it violates theof the whole provision. and then the appellees, the respondents in that case said, well, you't articulated any standard to decide which of these two competing maps better serves td of the whole. pellants said nothing in the reply brief. the court said, well, you ven't articulated any basis for deciding on the differce between the two. and, of cothe north carolina supreme court recognized that in this very case. justice alito: were there prior decisions of the north carolina suemcourt that step by step led t

mr. katyal: yes. justice alito: is that okay? mr. katyal: we do think that the history there would suesit is. nothing in our argument, of course, depends on it. again, ordinary judicial review, that is all we think you should reach in this case. not that, but the new york example is exactly that. justice alito:ell, that's not really judicial review. that is beusthey're not -- mr. katyal: correct. justice alito: -- reviewing it for anhi. what was your answer there? that is okay or that is not okay? mr. katyal: nothing in our position depends on it, your honor, but the historical test, which is what he's using, new york in 1792, did exacy at. justice alito: well, i'm not sure i understand your argument, but, okay, otonother example. suppose the state supreme court says the essence of our state constitution is fairness, and we don't think the map adopted by the giature is fair. is that okay? mr. katyal: the constitution says that the map adopted by the legislature is or the state court says that? justice alito: the state supreme court s

mr. ray: yes, it is. rep. henry: so in your testimony, he said that there is an absence of independent governance throughout the ftx group, yet mr. bankman-fried has said that he wasn't running alameda were making decisions on alameda's side. i assume you're going to say your statement is accurate. is mr. bankman-fried's statement accurate? mr. ray: i don't know the basis for his comment. i will note that he owned 90% of alameda. rep. mchenry: so you've seen no distinction in the governance between the two. mr. ray: absolutely not, no distinction whatsoever. the owners of the company have free reign. rep. mchenry:rep. mchenry: thank you for testifying. mr. ray: the gentleman from new york who is also the chair of the house committee on small business is now recognized for five minutes. >> you have had a long period of working on several high profile bankruptcies. you were recently quoted in the new york times as saying you have never seen such a complete failure of corporate control and the level of dysfunction

mr. warner? >> yes, absolutely. >> mr. siegel? >> yes. mr. money? a few weeks after the attempted attack on june 25th, 1 of the witnesses tweeted out the following a response a decision on abortion, overturning roe v. wade and i'll quote directly from the tweak, the six justices should never know peace again. it is our civic duty to a cost to them, every time they are in public. they are pariahs. since women do not have their rights these justices should never have a peaceful moment in public again. i have a question is that yes or no do you believe your rhetoric is a threat to democracy when you're calling to accost a branch of government, the supreme court? >> i don't believe that's the correct characterization. >> did you not to eat that? that you thought that the per supreme court justices should be accosted. >> what i'm saying is that that is not an accurate characterization of my statements. >> all of the same people that claim to be so concerned about violence and threats to democracy, there are also the wanted time there spewing hate themsel

mr. ray: yes. before structural purposes, for either presentation we tried to take the over 100 entities and put those under for silos. to demystify that, it is very simple, there is a u.s. silo. the ftx u.s. exchange for u.s. investors. there was i an international exchange, called ftx.com. again, for non-u.s. persons that invested in crypto. there was alameda, which is purely a crypto hedge funds. it made other investments which was the gamble type investments. -- the venture capital type of investments. there is a fourth entity, purely investments. although our investigation is not complete, those investments were not likely meet with either alameda money or money that originally came from ftx.com. that fourth island is purely investments. mr. mchenry: who owned those for silos? mr. ray: all of those entities were owned and controlled by sam bankman-fried. mr. mchenry: okay. can you describe the differences between ftx.com and ftx u.s. silos? mr. ray: yes. very simply, ftx u.s. was for u.s. citi

mr. mccarthy: yes. i think it's more than just the republicans in the house. can you tell me what the baseline they agreed to? reporter: no, i'm asking you -- mr. mccarthy: no i'm asking you a question. reporter: i know what you're saying, it's not public. but were republicans in the room or were they cut out completely? mr. mccarthy: if you as a reporter who covers the house of representatives is about to pass trillions of dollars and you don't know what the baseline is yet and they don't want to -- and they want to vote on it next week, it's not just us being cut out. if the two people who are deciding it are not being held up to the voters, do you feel good about that? i don't think anybody in america would feel good about it. why, if we're going to make a decision on funding government when we had more than a $31 trillion debt, when we spent more than $100 billion, in this new fiscal year on interest alone, we have runaway inflation we haven't seen in 40 years based on the mismanagement and spending of the democrats why would you feel comfortable moving for

mr. hice? >> yes. >> mr. hice vote yes. mr. color? >> yes. >> mr. color votes yes. >> mr. clyde? mr. biggs? mrs. may's? mr. turner? mrs. harrell? mrs. maloney? among mrs. maloney votes no. >> the clerk will accord the vote. we have two eyes and seven knows. >> the motion is not agreed to. i recognize myself for my opening statement. last year, we held a hearing in chicago to investigate its deteriorating bill delivery performance. this february, we visited baltimore. it is the city with the worst on-time delivery waiting in the nation. two months ago, we met in philadelphia. it is a city beset with poor postal performance and unsafe conditions for postal workers. today, we are back in d.c.. we are here right before the postal service is pivotal holiday rush. we are examining postal delivery. during peak season, a rush of packages and letters placed additional strain on the workforce and logistics network. it resulted in a consistent drop in on time delivery. today's hearing will thoughtfully and thoroughly examine the postal service's preparation for the season. we will hear from pos

mr. swowzy will vote yes on h.r. 8404. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new york seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. jacobs of new york, i inform the house mr. jacobs will vote yea on h.r. 8404. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from texas seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the person as the member designated by mr. lee, mr. paul gosar of arizona, they will vote no on h.r. 8404. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from maryland seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. ruppersberger, i inform the house that mr. ruppersberger will vote yes on h.r. 8404. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from georgia seek recognition? >> good morning, mr. speaker. as the member designated by representative williams of georgia, i inform the house that she will vote yea on h.r. 8404. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from pennsylvania seek recognition

mr. katyal: yes. justice thomas: justice gorsuch said it seems as thoi it depends on -- though it depends on what ox is being gorged. you would be making the same argument? mr. katyal: this court never second-guessed state interpretations of their own constitutions. if it's a general clause and it benefits or hurts minority voters, justice sutton says that's the process the states deal with. there is a special safeguard here which is the second half of the elections clause which allows congress to supplant whatever that errant state decision is. justice thomas: what is the source of the authority for the state of north carolina's supreme court to be involved in a federal election? i understand there's no disagreement about a state legislature, but this is a federal election and it's similar to the problem we had with the presidential election in bush v. gore. mr. katyal: it's just like smiley, your honor. it's the exact same thing. it's a federal issue. the north carolina court is interpreting the elec

mr. lyons -- leone. >> yes. i was wondering if you could clarify what the potential penalties are for states that don't comply with the calendar rules that we've sent out in our rules and we've been discussing today? co-chair roosevelt: so you're talking about the rules in the waivers or -- mr. leone: i'm talking about the general penalties if states don't comply with or -- co-chair roosevelt: there is a variety of them. i'll turn to graham to summarize some of them anyway. mr. wilson: so if you don't comply with the conditions of the waiver, you don't have a waiver and you are not allowed to go before the window. so that's step one. you don't follow the conditions, you then are obligated to go during the window with every state party. if then a state moves to go outside of the window because they don't have a waiver, our rules really clearly specifies what happens. excuse me. and this is rule 21 of the delegate selection rules. first, any state going outside of the window automatically loses half their delegate

mr. hice votes yes. mr. color? >> yes. >> mr. keller votes yes. mr. cline? if mr. biggs? miss may's? mr. laturner? miss herrell? miss maloney? >> miss maloney votes no. >> the clerk will record the vote. >> we have two eyes and seven maze. >> the motion is not agreed to. i recognize myself for my opening statement. last year we held a hearing in chicago too messy with deteriorating meld of liberal performance this february we visited baltimore. the city with the worst mealtime delivery rating in the nation. two months ago we met in philadelphia, a city beside for postal performance and onside conditions for postal workers. today we are back in d.c.. we are here right before the postal service is pivotal holiday rush. for our fourth hearing, examining postal delivery in just 13 months. during the season a rush of packages place additional strain on the workforce and logistics network. resulting inconsistent drops in on time delivery for home mail. today's hearing will thoughtfully and thoroughly examined i hope, the postal service is preparations for peak season. we will hear from pos

mrs. craig will vote yes on h.r. 8876. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from idaho seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. mike simpson of the state of idaho, i inform the house that mr. simpson will vote yes on h.r. 8876. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from florida seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. cawthorn of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. cawthorn will vote yes on h.r. 8876. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from texas seek recognition? >> as the member designated by mr. veasey of texas, i inform the house that mr. veasey will vote yes on h.r. 8876. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from utah seek recognition? >> mr. speaker, as the member designated by messrs. yoans and curtis from utah, i inform the house that they w will vote yean h.r. 8876. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does gentlelady from texas seek recognition. >> as the memb

i eat liana, mr. yes, she's a 3. what they get. my gosh, these new new bits listed on the israelites here. deborah, it gosh, these me should that still puts it dynamic roads and it was more is not political, but he had osha of machine. yes. i see when his name aqua buddha shares joseph lashania nash. i wasn't released and i did such those that i was some whistle wasting us via i'm betsy. me. i didn't buy music of them. was that i see you're mine. yeah. that's with the was give, wrote the new car. daniel of i me ah, what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy even foundation, let it be an arms race is often very dramatic. development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very difficult. time to sit down and talk. i'm willing of them. so booty stored in no cranium. t doria, shooting idea. she ship a report of control and put you on board. so she'll need to get them awarded. by like, the system will really be more than that. it's not sing device, such as miss

mr. ferryman and gardener. yes. why did i need more, only casanova can confuse the head of the women that is on the throne? yes, i found it on the road. who blasphemes the love of the century, he is a resident here, wiping his eyebrow? i am you here. and where did you milk such cows from? where is the milk? reliable source your servants this casanova will carry out the assignment to the user. who we have behind the scenes in st. petersburg true, he is ours as much as the people of the society of the jesus mayor, perhaps we should explain to the mission the essence of the denunciation in all details and order them to get ahead of casanova, we have no right to order the jesuit order. moreover, they have their own games with the young heir pavel, enough to object. dare to report from the time of venice i have a manuchie lawyer serving with me, i don’t trust i take it. do what trip requires a man from a boringly wielding blade, not a pen, deceased parents of slightly accessible women? really touched and not only on the

mr. cour: yes. justice. kagan: your basic argument is not war at gingles. mr. lacour: yes. >>gignles meant reasonably configured in wathat justice alo suggests, there is no -- any o cases that the court did need it reasonably configured in the way th justice alito suggests. take a look at the district. does the district has reasonable lines or are you doing something crazy? es the district incorporate mmities of an interest? est make sure that traditionaistricting criteria -- criteria satisfied? if you can come in with a map that looks le that, no one here can attest that even. maybe you do. doot know. the judges bowound that question easy. then you go , is is just a precondition tsh that you have a mapit traditional diriing criteria. they havth map. mr. lacour: again, i am not sure whthe court has notpoken about traditional principles and reconfiguration. at least the court has never suggested that a map in the state that it can never enact itself under the state's protection clause. >> why is he question in step one? step one we are not en worried about the states map, we

yes, mr. igor, what did putin do in response? understand that he did not react very well to all these restrictions and sanctions. he constantly somehow threatens european countries that he will freeze them. what is he there, uh, what other sanctions, anti-sanctions are working, what did he invent this time, well, this time, what did putin invent there? he issued the corresponding legislative document, a decree, if i'm not mistaken, he wrote that those countries that will receive illegal sanctions, you know the mantra today in the russian federation, illegal sanctions, sanctions that do not affect russia, but affect only those who directly apply them, so in this decree he wrote that countries to countries that will not , to countries that will comply with these sanctions, oil will not be supplied from my point of view, you know this, as the russians say , air is secretive why because the russian federation is very dependent on foreign markets, and here you can say to mr. to putin, let him read the materials of the meeting of the b

yes, mrs. natalya, yes, it is also natalya, or no, it was tatyana, mrs.missing what will you do, i know the answer and you know lend-lease and how is it in soviet literature, historical loans, rent, that’s all, you have to either pay for it or return it, or in this condition, or repaired, in short, it’s a whole procedure, long soviet union i paid for the land sorry for the second world war . it seems to me that it was 1971 or 73, on the other hand, the american government says and it’s free and it’s for the money of the ukrainian show, somewhere there is a place where you can take it without counting and throw it on the table under the time of negotiations by the united states is laziness - it must be given one way or another, now in ukraine they give billions for free my tens of billions well, i just don't believe it i will tell you that there are weapons there, but don’t give it to me, if it was in the kremlin, i would believe it. and if it was the white house, i wouldn’t believe them, my cockroaches in the heads. there are certainly no holy politicians

mr. lacour: yes. >>gignles meant reasonably configured in a way that justice alito suggests, there is no -- any of our cases that the court did need it reasonably configured in the way that justice alito suggests. take a look at the district. does the district has reasonable lis are you doing sometng crazy? does the disicincorporate communities of an interest? does it make sure tt traditional districting criteria -- criteria satisfied? if you can come in with ma that looks like that, no one here can attest that even. ybyou do. i do not know. the judges below found that question easy. then you go on, this is ju a precondition to show that you have a map with traditional districtingriria. they have that map. mr. lacour: again, i am not sure why the court has not spoken about traditional principles and reconfiguration. at least the court has never suggested that a map in the state that it can never enact itself under the state's protection clause. >> why is that the question in step one? step one we are

mr. bean >> jimmy: yes, he's being very mr.mes and he shakes his head and then - >> mr. clean >> jimmy: he's twisting a little bit [ laughter ] mr. bean is shocked. okay this is great. thank you, mr. clean thank you, mr. bean. >> thank you >> jimmy: on trampolines [ cheers and applause >> they're rebounding. they're rebounding >> jimmy: all right. this is the final round. okay, this is the big deal [ cheers and applause this is worth -- >> we're winning >> jimmy: this is worth all the points >> okay. >> jimmy: so, if you're watching at home and gambling, please don't gamble on this. you have a problem but this is worth all the points if we win this, we're champs for life, okay >> okay. forever. >> jimmy: forever and ever let's rotate the stage, please [ cheers and applause ♪ >> it completely rotates >> jimmy: why don't we just turn our chairs around [ light laughter ] i could face that way -- we spent all this money on this stage. we just -- but the chair can spin around. we've got to work on the budget here all right, here we

mr. doyle will vote yes on h.r. 7535. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire seek recognition? mr. pappas: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. larson of connecticut, mr. o'halleran, mrs. axne, mrs. dingell, mr. krishnamoorthi, i inform the house that these members will vote yes on the senate amendment to h.r. 7535. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new jersey seek recognition? mr. pallone: mr. speaker, as the member designated by mrs. ann kirkpatrick, albio sires, peter welsh, dina titus, eddie bernice johnson, bill pascrell, andy kim, don norcross, and peter defazio, these members will vote yes on the senate amendment to h.r. 7535. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from tennessee seek recognition? mr. fleischmann: thank you, mr. speaker. as the member designated by mr. brooks of alabama, i inform the house that mr. brooks will vote nay on h.r. 7535. mr. speaker, as the member designated by mr. gonzalez o

poles in relation to belarus or - the mood of belarusians are in belarus regarding what is happening, yes, mr are talking about belarusians, because we are talking about belarus, because about poles, i would know everything thanks to you and thanks to the many-faceted relations between ukrainians and poles in recent times, especially about belarusians this is tera incognita of some kind, well, look. well, belarusians have become quite active in poland. they still believe that it will be possible to change lukashenka's regime. they came to poland after the 20th elections with nadia. what is it? it 's temporary that it will be resolved quickly, but how we see that not everything is so simple. nevertheless, activists operating in poland and belarusian activists are becoming more active on the territory of belarus, organizing various kinds of protests. they are going to create a belarusian house. leaders of the belarusian opposition are often there not everything oh no, it’s just me, i just connected on the phone, i called , and because of that i think the opposite, oh, we’ll wait again, yes, not

mr. sergey, yes, no, i want, i don't want to sell, no, of course. does mr.erhiy really want to comment on something about the storm? and i basically wanted to say that we talked recently on the topic of the economy with ms. olena bilan, and now she said that it was not her opinion, in fact, in the first days of the war, the ukrainian economy was saved thanks to lightning the reaction of the national bank of ukraine, here she reminds that at 9:00 a.m., that is, a few hours after the missile attacks, literally a couple of hours later there was already a decision about freezing there, er, there, withdrawing this er, money there, about establishing a fixed exchange rate there and so on, it all preserved trust and saved the banking system, and everything continued to work, and this. well, if the key to keeping the economy going does not turn into a crisis , what do you think about it? and here, the russians instead, the russians claim exactly what the banking system should become a kind of main target of future attacks, because they also saw that this is the basi

mr. levin will vote yes on h.r. 8393. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from georgia rise? >> madam speaker, as the member designated by mr. bishop of north carolina, i inform the house that mr. bishop will vote no on h.r. 8393. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from colorado rise? mr. neguse: madam speaker, as the member designated by ms. pressley and mrs. beatty, i inform the house that -- i inform the house and the distinguished speaker from the state of new york that these two members will proudly vote yes on h.r. 8393. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from florida rise? >> as the member designated by dr. dunn of florida, i inform the house that dr. dunn will vote no on h.r. 8393. thank you. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from new hampshire rise? mr. pappas: thank you, madam speaker. as the member designated by mr. larson of connecticut, mr. o'halleran, mrs. dingell, mrs. axne, mr. krishnamoorthi and mr. kh

>> yes. >> mr. oman mace turned her attention to an lgbtq rights activist and instructor at harvard law and her tweets. >> only a few weeks after an attack on a supreme court justice one of the witnesses tweeted out the following in response to a decision on abortion overturning roe v. wade and i'll quote directly from the tweet. the six justices who overturned roe should never know peace again. it is our civic duty to accost them every time they are in public. since women don't have their rights these justices should never have a peaceful moment in public again. i know something about being accosted. the night of january 5th i was physically acancosted on the streets of d.c. by a constituent of mine. i blamed rhetoric, rhetoric on social media, at public events for being physically accosted. i carry a gun everywhere i go when i am in my district and i'm at home because i know personally that rhetoric has consequences. i've had my car keyed, my house spray painted, i had someone trespass in my house

mr. otasherov, do you have any version? yes? me, we have an idea that the stables have become workshops, so mr. moon kozlov is with you. what version of max is beautiful and technical progress, it’s clear here, and better than people, so many people don’t need to join in the twenties of the twentieth century, there were more cars on the streets, and more horses less on montanas began to be released by the stables, and there were a lot of them forever silence, but for the eternally poor artists. it was an opportunity to save money. so, thanks to the displacement of horses by cars, the stables became the workshops of artists , mr. congratulations on this release. and what about ourselves 5 4 5 in favor of the viewers, it's just that today we have some 100,000 rubles swing. the folder will be received by dmitry pineapple from moscow oh, mr. belozerov, of course, tiles will come out sideways to you, but mr. lead it's different, we'll see. it's a pity, say, well, that's on this question mr. golochan is on the last question. it seemed

well, somehow it was pushed forward very quickly and it is so it is about er buildings this 50 56 55 yes mrss the draft law as and like all other draft laws appeared in the new edition i would say so because it was actually supposed to be, er, 10 days ago , er, in the hall of the verkhovna rada, it was moved to this week, but here again appeared fresh 2000 pages with er, again with fresh edits and seemingly taken into account positions of nazk, you know what nazk issued a very devastating uh opinion on him and uh the committee and under the committee on state construction studied it for a long time and introduced something that is not clear to the nose, but in any case, this is a bill that causes a great resonance in the communities because part of the powers will be taken away from the communities and also in the environment of completely different people or so she said, at the same time, you will see an architect together opposing, well, it is very rare when you will see when activists come together . i want to tell you that the bills are big enough . i don't know if anyone managed to read

yes, mr. kyrylo, how is it to lead, as mr.rii says . in the orthodox church, these are the so-called old-style churches, which arose and andriy mentioned bulgaria, indeed, in romania and in greece, they are, uh, communities , even dioceses, this is quite a number, uh, the number of uh, orthodox who disagreed with by switching to the gregorian calendar , and they are turning away from the church in the 20s of the last century, so i think that it is possible to avoid such a split, which is unnecessary in ukraine, if we really leave it up to the communities themselves to decide when they want to celebrate so we will to talk about the diversity of christmas celebrations in ukraine and not about the school anymore, and when the communities themselves decide. i think this is the essence of the decision of the orthodox church of ukraine. the communities themselves decide when it is better for them to celebrate. this will allow us to avoid another unnecessary division into the ukrainian idle time. by the way, i have to mention that ev

meeting of 2026, yes. mr. mcdonald: so they will be received by the full -- by the -- chair roosevelt: be received by the new committee, yes. >> 2025? chair roosevelt: the new committee is elected at the first meeting in 2025. so it could be by the second meeting of the -- of the d.n.c. in 2025. mr. mcdonald: that's what the motion is, fall meeting in 2025. chair roosevelt: strike everything i just said. mr. mcdonald: i was going to say the parliamentarian tell me that a friendly amendment was not in order. i was going to take it as an amendment from a friend and i was going to -- leave it the way it is. chair roosevelt: if that's how it currently reads then -- applications to come to the new committee, i just know that there's always a risk that something that was first of all put in place by the old committee and then enacted by the old committee gets forgotten by the new committee. mr. mcdonald: after all, you need me to restate the motion? chair roosevelt: couldn't hurt. mr. mcdonald: i move that preliminar

>> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: to mr. and mrs. jackson. and do they have children? ny? >> one. >> judge judy: so the three of them were living there? judgeudy:y, andhen did you rent the h t gu, ma'am, of 2016. veleas no, we hadme'am. a month-to-month lease. >> month-to-month agreement. >> judge judy: and what was the rent? >> the rent was $1,200 plus half of the utilities. >> judge judy: half of the utilities because you were living in the back part of the house? >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: okay. came a point when you evicted them. >> yes, ma'am. >> judge judy: when was that? >> i actually served them a 30-day notice on january the 6th of 2017. >> judge judy: and when did they move out? >> they actually moved out february.

of ukraine a-a well, we are moving on, our smartphone continues on espresso e-e on the connection yes mr yes good evening i congratulate you with the worlds to come did you manage to prepare for that new year's holiday today as you can see it was successful and destroyed 12 the occupiers' missiles were launched this time by a small number of planes. so there were various videos on the channels. well, you see, some may be in real time, some from the past. therefore, we need to check all this and see how it corresponds to reality. actually, about 20 missiles was launched today around 1:00 p.m. strategic response missile aircraft are tu 95 ms, the same area of ​​the caspian sea, there were also launches from the eastern direction of iskander-m ground-based operational-tactical complexes, this is actually ballistics, ballistic missiles, that's why we have such a result several rockets several rockets fell on the marshes during the arrest, which is very nice , and there are even footage of the aggression, as they destroyed human property there. maybe someone was injured. well, you definitely

yes? thank ou, mr the war to end. my turn, yes? thank you, mr president. _ the war to end. my turn, yes? isers talk about how critically- you, mr president. your advisersl talk about how critically important it is to _ talk about how critically important it is to view — talk about how critically important it is to view face—to—face - it is to view face—to—face interaction, _ it is to view face—to—face interaction, two - it is to view face—to—face interaction, two plus- it is to view face—to—face . interaction, two plus hours it is to view face—to—face - interaction, two plus hours for us to visit— interaction, two plus hours for us to visit president _ interaction, two plus hours for us to visit president zelensky, - interaction, two plus hours for us to visit president zelensky, what| to visit president zelensky, what you learned _ to visit president zelensky, what you learned what _ to visit president zelensky, what you learned what you _ to visit president zelensky, what you learned what you took - to visit president zelensky, what you learned what you took from i to visit president ze