mr. zaretzky seems to have found. his house is next door. he has lived there also for some time and so do his parents whom i knew. i feel for the neighborhood, the spirit of the neighborhood, this whole thing is a very negative thing. i feel that pamela white head should be given some support and leeway to proceed as she's been at this for 3 years. we are proud owners there. we have our houses, my house is 110 years old and i think the house that pamela white head has bought is also very old, older than mine and is a beautiful addition to the neighborhood. it should remain that way and i fully request that you consider some exemptions and let her proceed with the building because this unseeming building sight does enhance the neighborhood. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm nancy levens. i live around the corner. i'm not a party to this. i'm not a neighbor. but i have been on the cal hollow association board and familiar with the guidelines. this originally was a pair of flats, 2 units. it is the understanding that the sponsor wa

mr. zaretzky. you have 7 minutes to present your case. >> i'm irving zaretzky. before we get started i had asked ms. goldstein. i had a history prepared for this particular project. she mentioned to me that it would be up to the board if they would accept it and if they do i should come up with 11 copies and i have those. if you would allow me to leave that. >> did you say it's a chronology? >> partly narrative and partly chronology. >> how many pages? >> it's about 7 pages. >> did you just now prepare it? >> i prepared it before and submitted it and ms. goldstein told me she told the other side that they could not submit in a letter and then both of you should prepare and leave it up to the board and the board will be able to decide whether to accept it. >> does anyone care for it? okay. >> i don't have a problem taking it. >> okay. that is other side seen it? >> yes. it was e-mailed to you. it is what was e-mailed to you. >> let's leave it out for now. >> it's true. >> okay. >> why don't we set it aside and if we need it for our deliberations we'll ask to view

mr. zaretzky you have 3 minutes of rebuttal. >> i think the issue is very clear to us and that is that the plans that you approve, were in themselves wrong. after the negotiation that supervisor farrell ended and they were supposed to submit the plans, they snuck into features which were never discussed. the other one was the curb cut. in each stage of the game, what characterizes this whole enterprise is deposition. -- deception and we are going to take this up with the board of supervisors. we again request that you either revoke or suspend this permit because a permit is a permit is a permit whether it's decide on technical reasons or any other reasons, it is still a permit and it has to relate to its mother permit. the relationship here is one of fraud. therefore, i strongly urge you to support the neighborhood and support honest and integrity because the board, your work is supposed to be transparent and accountable. you cannot have material leaving the city of the neighbors to simply fiction. it's about time that we enforce our rules evenhandedly in all cases. that is one of the issu