mr. zuckerberg and the high-tech industry, they met with the agriculture business, the farming interests for large corporate farms, they met with la raza, they met with the immigration lawyers association, they met with groups wanting cheap labor. they met with all of those folks, and each one of them was asked to sign onto the bill. and they wouldn't sign onto the bill until they got language in it that advocated what they wanted. so they wanted to get their benefits in the bill. and once they got that, one for all, all for one, they signed in blood, we're going to support the bill but don't you change my special interest. so the senators said okay, we got all of you special interests to agree, we all agree, we're not going to accept any substantial change to what you have in the bill. and we'll fight off any amendments. and they can make all the awmplets them about what's good for america, but we've told if you you'll support this bill we're going to give you what you wanted. that's what the deal was all about. and it's not good because the american people are the ones who are not bein

mr. zuckerberg is a conservative. do we owe our loyally to -- loyalty to him because he brilliantly produced facebook or do we owe our loyalty to the working men and women who vote for us, who fight our wars, pay our taxes and try to serve our country every year? well, i suspect if mr. zuckerberg were to post job openings tonight on his facebook, put out his salaries what he wants to pay, he'd find there might be plenty of americans that want to take these jobs. i suspect so. so i -- i -- i'd ask him to do so, put on your website what kind of qualifications, what kind of salaries you'll pay and let's see if we don't have more applications than you've suggested exist out there. we know we have college graduates in large numbers in stem fields also having a hard time finding work. we know that's a fact. we've got senior -- senior engineers and scientists and computer people that would like to go to work, too. maybe they've been laid off. maybe there's been downsizing and they've got experience. are they not to be consid

mr. zuckerberg is trying to tell us something, the sign behind me right in front of facebook headquartersreads a small team has been working on a big idea. that big idea could very well be that brand new video sharing service through instagram. so perhaps soon you'll be able to create short videos on the photo sharing app and not just still images. as scott and i were actually talking off camera, this story is just as much an instagram story as it is a facebook one. just because you're an instagraÑ user doesn't mean you have to post to facebook but it's certainly an option. one thought here is if facebook gets instagram to offer more, maybe you'll see more sharing on facebook and more videos, perhaps fancier and prettier videos, if you're able to alter or edit them like you can currently with photos, exactly how this service will work, for example, how long would the videos be able to be? these are all the details we'll just have to wait to hear. first and foremost, we need to see if the rumor mill is turning out truth this morning, if, in fact, facebook is going to be introducing a new v

mr. zuckerberg, with all due respect to him, he's way off base. if this is being done, gathering information from the internet, it's much more troubling. on the other hand, they may not need permission from the companies. they may get it from the court. if court may be able to authorize them. they can authorize them to do these so-called listening in to e-mails. it's obviously the wrong term, but they can do that without being told, without telling the companies that. right now you have a situation where we are breaching possibly the 4th amendment. we are going a little broad on this. the metadata thing for the phone calls, really doesn't bother me that much. maybe they can where you are, who you called, that's not the same thing as listenening on a phone call. you have people like zuckerberg saying -- >> it's e-mails, whether they're reading the e-mails. >> frankly -- >> would you be in favor, i want to get you both guys on the record, if it's just foreign e-mails, are you okay with it or do you trust it or what? >> i think it's much more defensi

mr. zuckerberg say face? unveiling a new product on june 20th. to get the share price moving higher again? we're going to give you the trade. and you tweeted, we traded. oufr pros will give you the plays on the stocks you asked for so you can make your next smart move, when we come back. [ male announcer ] we've been conditioned to accept less and less in the name of style and sophistication. but to us, less isn't more. more is more. abundant space, available leading-edge technology, impeccable design, and more than you've come to expect from a luxury vehicle. the lexus es350 and epa-estimated 40 mpg es hybrid. this is the pursuit of perfection. >>> welcome back. the dow is up 165 point, and a good reason can go towards old technology stocks. so-called old tech looking pretty good today. cisco sleegd the dow. microsoft getting a bit of a pot. you take a look at cisco right there. that's a gain of better than 3%. highs of the day, we have microsoft as well. in fact, there it is, up 2% as well, so a good day for technology. not so fast, mike murphy

mr. zuckerberg pretending he's a conservative advocate, running ads telling us all what we ought to knowd do about this bill. and the goal, i've got to say, was to provide some sort of cover to get wavering democrats and republicans to sign on to this new bill that's going to have 20,000 agents. well, why would they be willing to make such a dramatic unceremonious retreat on a position they have taken for months? well, first, they were desperate. something needed to be done. secondly -- secondly -- they know that the promises made in this substitute bill to build fences and to add 20,000 agents will never occur. it's not going to happen. so they're really not worried about that. it's the kabuki dance, the bob and weave, rope a dope. everybody knows how the process is working. the staff knows it. i think most of the media probably understands it. these promised actions are not going to happen in the future. the interests who pushed this bill never wanted to end the illegality. i've been fighting on this for years. every time we get close to fixing everify. in fact, we had debates -- we ha