mr. zuckerberg and facebook itself. >> e has talked about it in sub-saharan africa is well.a, there is a regulatory fight because india is not just working to move past one into g access but working to develop their own domestic handset businesses. >> and limit those services to a handful of companies. corey: that is exactly not what is happening right here. dude be pretty much every country. they have banned these proposals because they think they fight against the idea of net neutrality. and these mobile internet plans. one concert we understand why someone who believes so much would think it is a great thing for everybody. the reason i think for so much criticism, they warranted it. google has talked about offering universal internet access. can they do it? cory: you have seen a big expense. at millions have been spent to provide a lot more access than is out there right now. withestingly, partnering microsoft bing and not with google to do this. it is an interesting take for these guys. zuckerberg making the case. pretty unpopular in india. they really see this as an ame

mr. zuckerberg is trying to do. have been struggling with internet adoption here in the united states for more than 10 years. oft was the whole purpose our national broadband plan back in 2010. there is a supply-side component of it. there is a demand side. one element of that is price and the other is relevance. even if i can afford it. what this low-cost program or no-cost program does is give people an on-ramp onto the internet. it might be limited programming, but it allows people to access the internet and perhaps they could do it before. this notion that if all caps have it makes no sense. do you think they could ameliorate those concerns and offering google plus? david: they have adjusted the program already quite a bit. in india a lot of these poor people don't understand what going on the internet means. you are actually feeding the market just by giving them something they would need to be aware of. the idea of this plan is that people will be able to pay for it down the road. to wean themlittle mean thabl

mr. zuckerberg., i want to finish one thing i was about to say before, i think one of the issues here, the biggest issue here is raised even if this was a true foundation -- we have a situation where we have some of the wealthiest people in the world are amassing these unbelievable fortunes. they are doing them in ways -- not doing anything illegal -- where they generally are not paying much, if any, income taxes. while it is great they are devoting these fortunes to philanthropy, we're entering a situation where people have tens of billions of dollars who are not contributing to the tax system. sort of withdrawing from the political system. most people pay taxes and they give money and a direct money to be spent on certain services by electing people to make those decisions. what these folks are doing is withdrawing from the tax system by not paying income taxes or capital gain taxes, and withdrawing from the political system in how their money is being spent. they are making the decisions, not thei

mr. zuckerberg is trying to do.e have been struggling with internet adoption here in the united states for more than 10 years. that was the whole purpose of our national broadband plan back in 2010. the problem is that when you talk about broadband adoption there is a supply-side component , of it. that is always the infrastructure. then there is a demand side. one element of that is price and the other is relevance. access to the internet needs to be relevant to me if i want to get on or not even if i can , afford it. what this low-cost program or no-cost program does is give people an on-ramp onto the internet. yes it might be limited , programming, but it allows people to access the internet when perhaps they could not do it. you solve the affordability problem and the relevancy issue. this notion that if all can't have it, the non-can't have it, this does not make sense to me. cory: do you think they could ameliorate those concerns and offering google plus? david: they have adjusted the program already quite a b

mr. zuckerberg has in the past years given $50 million to san francisco general hospital, $150 million to the silicon valley foundation and, kris, $100 million to new jersey schools. >> i would say we shouldn't apologize for being skeptical and asking the questions, but there is more than one way to do things, right? >> he's given away a lot of money. >> so every day has become cyber monday with a record number of americans shopping online this holiday season. and that has started a shipping war of sorts. businesses competing to get items delivered faster than ever. brian moore explains how to do it. >> reporter: just as christmas trees are lighting up, online retailers are working on lightning fast delivery. >> they're trying to get it to you as quickly as possible same day. i think that's what they're all competing for now. >> reporter: amazon has been an aggressive leader when it comes to shipping speed. and now competitors including best buy, google express are playing catchup offering same-day or next day shipping in some cities. amazon is raising the bar with prime now offering free

mr. zuckerberg probably likes the old testament rather than the new. stuart: is that your argument.assets convinced to his hands. stuart: do you realize we agree on this? >> yes. stuart: it's both. it's generosity and tax avoidance do you agree with me? >> i would go one step further and say all taxation is theft. ashley: you were five seconds away. stuart: all right., judge, we thank you very much indeed. >> thank you. stuart: good stuff. how about yahoo? let's talk about individual companies and stocks. there are several reports that saying several companies, yahoo, considering selling all of its core internet business. cheryl, if they do that, what's next? cheryl: a web search portal. they're considering two things. spinning off alibaba or selling the core internet businesses. if they did both of those things, which i doubt they will to be honest. you have yahoo.com to compete with microsoft and google and you might as well close the door. it's a restructuring play. stuart: thirty-six dollars a play, the only value in yahoo is their ownership in stakes in other internet companies

mrs. bloomberg. coming up, mark zuckerberg gains a daughter and gives away a fortune. the facebook founder announcing his plans to donate 99% of his shares in the social network. plus, a changing of the guard. can the new leader save the smartphone business? and what goes down must come up a new investment in snapchat. mark dose of news from zuckerberg. they are the proud parents of a baby girl named maximo. he planned to give away 99% of their shares in facebook worth about $45 billion. in a letter to their daughter he said our society has an obligation to invest and improve the lives of all those coming into this world, not just those who are already here. joining me with more is our bloomberg billionaires reporter tom metcalfe and sarah. what is happening here? 99% of his facebook shares. >> it is worth $45 billion today, a big chunk of money. although he is phasing it out he is doing $1 billion a year or the next three years. containing voting control. astakes effort to get going much money. you have to get these investments into size. but so far he is telling us t