mr. zuretski we could not decipher an alignment between the works and plans the work in progress and the work to be done and hence forth they asked bring us clear, distinct plans so we can see what the project is about and this is why the supreme court in the laurel heights case said in in sequa the neighborhood should have the total ity and whole view of what the project is about the question of logo lowering the doors 18 inches found a new life i'm sure as we get through the hearing new permits will emerge that's the that's the mod u.s. operandi of this project sponsor. we're asking the preservation of the neighborhood and asking for families to return to san francisco of course. you are looking at one individual who was raised in a flat and turned out to be a pretty good person . i think our supervisor was raised in a flat. i think that we ought to remember that there are other ways to live except in mansions. [applause]. >> >> thank you. now at this time our hearing under item 37 has been held and is closed now item 38 and 40 are in the hands of the board. supervisor farrell. >> than