do they're creating new possibilities for toys all of which is bringing exciting change here to mrs server if you think gaming generation has a long enjoyed bringing a virtual edge to real world fun like teaming up to play laser tag and linking up to sixteen players with small phones and wife i believe mark but there comes a point where kids just need to get moving no matter how old school that might be but. that's it you're up today with the latest from the world of business for more find us on facebook photos on twitter at b.w. on the school business on there as well head on the see how free is my handle and i'll be back tomorrow same time same place in the meantime here's a look at the world markets right now over. g.w. church diversity. where the world of science is at home in many languages. on top of that i've been going. on with that our innovations magazine for in asia the us for every week and always looking to the future on d w dot com science and research for. climate change. waste. pollution it's just. time for good news to go out africa people and projects that are changing ou

do they're creating new possibilities for toys all of which is bringing exciting change here to mrs server in the gaming generation has long enjoyed bringing a virtual edge to real wild fun like teaming up to play laser tag and linking up to sixteen players with small funds and why find the bar you bought that comes a point where kids just need to get moving no matter how old school that might be. and work at any of those toys are one busting business for to. try. to. ensure the conflicts are going to talk to many delays cost more as a new war crimes court for many people want to see you described before it's even tougher running over this is not going to. desk of the prime minister ramu shara deny is my guest the west has told a list of course he stopped he could pretty much forget about joining nato for the new what's he going to do. on. freedom of expression. a value that always has to be defended and new. all over the world are to a freedom freedom of art. a multimedia project about artists and their right to express their views freely. d w dot com part of freedom. bursts. to use of sp

do they're creating new possibilities for toys all of which is bringing exciting changes here to mrs server because i think gaming generation has long enjoyed bringing a virtual edge to real world fun like teaming up to play laser tag and linking up to sixteen players with smart phones and wife try. but there comes a point where kids just need to get moving no matter how old school that might be. bold brash and brilliant this summer not talking about me ben we're talking about china versus actually of course the opulent collections on the supermodels who wore them made his label world famous now the largest ever retrospective on restock his work has opened in berlin just over twenty years after the designer was shot dead in front of his florida home a tragic end for a man revered as a fashion god. mesmerizes even today decades on. it represents beauty eternal youth and a life lived in the spotlight. gianni versace created these pieces. they were later collected by his devoted alexandra's the funny. this shark was the first my first but it was so freaking expensive one fifth i was living in

but classified at the time they were transacting on the e-mail server of mrs. clinton at home? >> that is correct, lou, and thanks. it is it important that that distinction be made. they were classified at the time they were produced and transmitted. they are not pretroactively classified as a smoke screen or red herring. they were classified when written and resident on the we upper lap top. >> lou: investigators knew that but did not share it with the public? >> i have a tidbit with grassly and the comey memo. >> lou: jump in any way you want. >> we have a sworn statement who was in the fbi, and in that sworn declaration mr. hardy said that all of comey's memos, all of them were classified at the time they were written and they remain classified and so the open question for mr. grassly, was it 4 of 7 or what time were they? >> no, we have a swarn declaration from the chief officer of the fbi they were classified at the time comey wrote them. >> lou: and should litigation come to that, that is determined in the case and give us clear understanding of the fbi as to the level of

these are in fact classified at the time they were transacting on the e-mail server of mrs. clinton at home. >> that is correct lou and thanks. it's very important that distinction be made. these records and documents were classified at the time they were produced and transmitted. they're not so-called retroactively classified. that's a smoke screen and they were classified when they were written. they were classified when they were transmitted and classified when they were a resident on the weiner laptop. lou: and the fbi investigators presumably knew that did they not? they just didn't share it with the public. >> absolutely and i have a tid bit concerning mr. grassley and the comey memos that maybe jumping ahead a bit but this is important. lou: jump in any direction you want here. >> we have a sworn declaration here from david hardy whose the chief foia officer of the fbi we attained in the last few days and in that sworn declaration mr. hardy says that all of comey 's memos, all of them, were classified at the time they were written and they remain classified, so the ki

mrs. clinton's private email server and of the russia collusion nonsense evolving trump. how our heads not already rolling just knowing what we know now? on my radio show this morning, joe did you have a made the case that this all indicates that we need a big change of leadership. at the fbi and at the justice department. >> quite apparent that christopher wray is not up to the job of being fbi director, that he is undermining his credibility, not strengthening it. and that he is completely, completely controlled by the upper bureaucracy of the fbi. the other real problem is rod rosenstein. i don't think there is any, any doubt whatsoever that rosenstein is too close to call me, too close to mueller, too close to wray, and too close to a whole bunch of people. jeff sessions seems to have decided if he could have a little bit of fun within the boundaries of the playing field, in market anybody mad at him, that's going to be enough to get the job done. >> laura: it was ugly. it was brutal. and i have to say, the american public has a right to know what, if any, crimes or o

mrs. clinton's e-mail server was deeply flawed.you talk to anybody who is in federal law enforcement, the way the investigation was handled, the side deals, immunity deals is deeply, deeply disturbing. he was part of that. now, you notice i said that. i don't believe mueller is tainted by that. i'm not attacking the fbi in order to taint mueller. you can have two ideas in your head at the same time. one, mueller is an honorable guy that should go forward. two, the fbi messed up in the clinton e-mail investigation and may have messed up in the fiza investigation. >> terry mcauliffe did give money but it was contributions, not a loan. that would be illegal. >> i didn't mean to say it was a loan. it's contributions. $700,000 -- >> you said she didn't pay back. we don't pay back contributions. >> i mean -- yeah. she didn't have to pay it back is my point. that's the whole point. it's 500 from mcauliffe, 200 from people who wouldn't have contributed without mcauliffe. he should have recused himself. he made decisions in the clinton foun

mr. trump suggesting that he is politically motivated. mccabe once oversaw an investigation into hillary clinton's use of a private email server, though no ges were filed. mr. trump falsely claimed that coincided with mccabe's wife's failed bid for a virginia senate seat in 2015, when she was backed by a pro-clinton group. this past week, mr. trump denied reports he had asked mccabe last may how he voted in the 2016 election. >> did you ask mccabe who he voted for? >> i don't think so. no. i don't think so. >> you don't. >> i don't know what's the big deal with that, because i would ask you who you voted for, who did you vote for? >> woodruff: all this, on the heels of new questions about special counsel robert mueller, after last week's "new york times" report that mr. trump wanted to fire him last june. on sunday, republicans were split on whether they should intervene to protect mueller's job. senator lindsey graham: >> i think mr. mueller is the perfect guy to get to the bottom of all of this. and he will. and i think my job, among others, is to give him the space to do it. i intend to do that. i have got legislation protecting mr. mu

mrs. clinton. remember she set up that e-mail server overall this traffic went back and forth, a week before she became secretary of state, doing it willingly, waitingly with waitingly with full knowledge. and other senior professional state department staff, all communicated with her, knowing about this outlawserver. david: let me stop you. you saying not just an individual matter with -- >> no. david: with individuals like huma and others doing stuff putting our top-secret at risk, but it was a criminal enterprise, designed and organized by hillary clinton, your words? >> absolutely it was. 4 fore knowledge, and forethought. it is more fuel on the fire. also realize this judicial watch got huma abedin, cheryl mills and 5 others under oath on these same questions. and so, our litigation broke loose this story. frankly if we had not done the work we have done, no one would know about this. they would not know about huma abedin. david: i don't top blow smoke in your -- i don't want to blow smoke in your direct but i cannot emphasize enough, the work you do in unveiling stuff, that has put our national s

mr. campbell talked about the dad who was, as i recall, the interview was a veteran and was now elderly and serverountry and mr. campbell said i had a conversation with my dad not long ago and he went on to say he summed up donald trump in one word. he said in this is mr. campbell referring to his dad he said he's dangerous. you said you know, your dad is very astute. you will hear from the president tonight and i think the president is going to speak to a country in which millions of people share your concern of february for, 2016 about the president who you believe then would be abusive to the constitution, a bully and dangerous. in my minute remaining i'd like to ask you about your schedule because you have an unusual propensity for not releasing what is going on on your schedule. i direct you to friday may 5t may 5th. you spent the day in pulse oklahoma and that night you were scheduled to give a keynote address at a fundraiser for the oklahoma publican party because of the hijacked you cancel that event. you're not allowed to go into fundraising for parties in the position that you are in. th

general report about how the fbi handled the investigation of hillary clinton's e-mail server played a role in this. both mr. mccabe's own concern about what it might say about him and chris wray's concern about what it might say about mccabe. and now we have more indication that that was one of the motivating factors here. last night, the fbi director, chris wray, sent a note to all bureau employees. it's only five paragraphs long, 11 sentences, and at first glance, it looks like a nonsequitur. it talks about the importance of doing things right. and chris wray says he's gotten some briefing on what the inspector general report's going to say. he will make sure he is not swayed by political pressure. wants to make sure the fbi does everything by the book. in the very next paragraph, he says after discussions with deputy director andy mccabe, he submitted his intention to retire march 18. so the fact that the director puts these two things together in this message, saying i want you all to know mccabe is leaving and i want you all to know i'm concerned about what the ig report's going to say makes it pretty

mr. trump today also brought up the f.b.i.'s investigation into hillary clinton's email server. >> hillary clinton had an interview where she wasn'trn in, she wasn't given the oath, they didn't take notes, they didn't record. and it was done on the fourth of july weekend. that's perhaps ridiculous. a lot of people looked upon that being a very serious breach, and >> woodruff: and while it is true that mrs. clinton was not under oath or recorded, notes were taken, and they were released by the f.b.i. afterward. to sort through the president's remarks today, as well as the continued fallout from a scathing new book, i'm here with matt schlapp, chairman of the american conservative union. he also served as white house political director for president george w. bush. and chris buskirk, radio talk show host, and editor of the online journal, american greatness. thank you both for being here. we wanted to hear from both of you tonight. we have been hearing a lot of criticism of the president lately. we had former vice president biden on the program last week, we interviewed michael wolff about his book this week. we want to hear your pe

mr. rivera. in the original memo, comey wrote that there was pretty clear and convincing evidence that -- excuse me, realistic likelihood that her servere really had been penetrated by a foreign power but that got edited out to you. if you read the original version and what was eventually released, it seems like two different documents. >> sean: you are saying that comey believed that clinton's server and a mom and pop bathroom closet had been infiltrated with top-secret special classified information and foreign agencies got hold of it? >> he says it was reasonably likely that that had happened and that is something we did not hear in the press conference. these edits were significant. more substantive than i think we knew. i think there's a lot of questions on capitol hill about why would comey allow this to happen? >> sean: why did he write the exoneration months before the investigation, which is part of it. let's go to go to "the daily beast." sara, the department of justice has reopened, now that we know that the exoneration, which john is reporting about, the original copies are out. now they are reporting, the department of jus

about analysing what has been going on on their servers and platforms, so we know for sure what is going on and what we need to do to act against it. mrating with you? it isa they are not cooperating with you? it is a serious matter for those companies to refuse to co—operate with a parliamentary enquiry. they are cooperating with an inquiry in the us senate. it will be a very bizarre way to start the year by his company refusing to cooperate with what our reasonable requests of a parliamentary committee. we had a debate in the house of commons before the christmas recess where the digital media and sport made it very clear he expects facebook to respond to the inquiry of the committee. that means answering questions and cooperating was at the government is prepared to consider the action to take. you set a deadline for facebook which was today. are you saying they have not responded? reset the deadline for twitter. —— we set a deadline. responded? reset the deadline for twitter. -- we set a deadline. the british government has asked for information and they have not come back. neither twitter nor facebook have given any information r

mr. rivera. the -- in the original memo, comey wrote that there was pretty clear and convincing evidence that the -- excuse me, realistic likelihood that her serveren penetrated by a foreign powers but that got edited out, too. it's amazing what got edited out. if you read the original version and what was originally released it seems like two different documents. >> sean: you are saying comey believed that clinton's server in the mom and pop bathroom closet had been infiltrated with top secret special access program classified information and foreign agencies got ahold of it? >> he said that was reasonably likely that happened. that wasn't something we heard in the press conference. these edits are more substantive than we knew there is a lot of questions on capitol hill tonight about why would comey allow these things to happen? >> sean: why did he write the exoneration months before the investigation which is part of it. let's go to the daily beast. sarah, i will ask you, the department of justice also reopened now now we know that the exoneration which john is reporting about and the original copies are out, now they are reporting to departme

servers goes, remember when she did that. >> voters saw right through this. dagen: i think a big question here. >> mr.t your views on this, you were in congress, about several decades ago it was very different place congress had very different powers, does this congress today have the power to compel people to testify, and to produce difficulties, or has congress given up too much of its power? . >> look i think comes down to old saying no guts no glory. the united states congress has normal latent power i will give you two capitals first of all, they may well start moving to subpoena people and to turn into criminal charges, and remember rosenstein is part of this whole mess you go back look at who who were together, back in the period when for example, creating independently council to try to destroy dick cheney same people same gang, and i think -- came out all are tainted, second, very simply model, cut off the funding. say we are going to zero out the justice department, unless it does what we are requiring it to do. and simply don't include the justice department in the omnibus watch how rapidly