mrs. brooks texted people close to the prime minister telling them that he had to be sacked. but i think it's clear from your answer that was going to happen anyway. >> it was going to happen anyway. look, he's perfectly entitled to his point of view but you can't really remain a minister in the government if you called for the prime minister to go. >> page 120 of your book, mr. blair, you say i reinned back my folk who wanted to go into, quote, kill mode on it. he said that must be a reference to special advisers and mps working with mrs. brooks. is that correct or not? >> no, it's got nothing to do with rebekah brooks at all. the fact is -- when that coup began, and i think there was some story about him having visited gordon brown. those are my people who felt very strongly that they should go out and attack on this and say this is part of a conspiracy to get rid of the prime minister. you know, i just -- look, i had taken my own decision that really by then i was going to have to in effect say when i was going to go, and i thought it was just going to be unnecessarily dam

before i read it out that news international had recently disclosed a number of other text messages to mrs. brooks and mr. cameron. so the section 21 request is in fact an order under statute to disclose. those relate to a period of october, 2009. may, 2011 and june 2011. in the inquiry all of the other text messages i referred to are irreally stronet terms of reference. and it's explained why text messages and other in other monthly -- on the 7th of october, 2009. during the party conference -- certainly within eight or nine days report sent, at 6:45 in the afternoon. on grounds of really inventories and she says seriously, suggesting the first line contains or might contain something of a jocular nature. i do understand with the time, let's discuss over country supper soon. on the party, it was because i had asked a number of benine international news recently and they were disappointed not to see you. but as always, sam is wonderful, and -- and i thought -- i am so rooting for you tomorrow. not just as a personal friend but because professional, we are in this together. the rooting for you tomo

before i read it out that news international has recently disclosed a number of other text messages between mrs. brooks and mr. cameron. pursuant to section 21 request that is in order under statute with the disclosed material. those relate to the period of october 2 thousand 9 and may 2011 and june 2011. in the inquirer's judgment, all the text messages i have referred to are irrelevant to the reference. the link letters also explained why text messages are not available. that will be put on the website. the one we are looking at is the seventh of october, 2009. i think that's during the party conference, but it's certainly within eight or nine days or so of the support she said but seriously. that contains or might contain something of a nature. i understand the times, let's discuss over country supper soon. let's look at the post endorsement and they were disappointed not to see you. i thought it was always the chance personified. i am so rooting for you tomorrow not as a permanent friend, but professionally, we are definitely in this together. they are rooting for you tomorrow. you are giving a spe

before i read about use use -- news international recently disclosed a number of other text messages between mrs. brooks and mr. cameron pursuant to section 21 request. section 21 request is, in fact, an order statue, requiring people to disclose what you. october 2009-may 2011, and june june 2011, and it requires judgment on the other text messages referred to are irrelevant to its terms of reference. this is where we will look at one. and news international through their -- have also explained why text messages and other monthly periods are not available. that will be of course our website. the one we're looking at the seventh of october, 2009 which i think is during the party conference. >> yes. >> certain with an eight or nine days or so. [inaudible] the first one has been redacted. it's on grounds of relevance. and then she says but seriously, which suggested the first line contained or might contain something of a jocular nature i do understand the issue with the times. let's discuss over country supper soon. on the party, it was because i had asked a number, i was probably news international endo

before i read about, use use -- news international recently disclosed a number of other text messages between mrs. brooks and mr. cameron pursuant to section 21 request. section 21 request is, in fact, an order, statue, requiring people to disclose what you. october 2009-may 2011, and jun june 2011, and it requires judgment on the other text messages referred to are irrelevant to its terms of reference. this is where we will look at one. and news international through their -- have also explained why text messages and other monthly periods are not available. that will be of course our website. the one we're looking at the seventh of october, 2009, which i think is during the party conference. >> yes. >> certain with an eight or nine days or so. [inaudible] the first one has been redacted. it's on grounds of relevance. and then she says but seriously, which suggested the first line contained or might contain something of a jocular nature, i do understand the issue with the times. let's discuss over country supper soon. on the party, it was because i had asked a number, i was probably news international, e