mr. cambridge, one more question. you break the valve on the fireplace before or after the attack on derek? i don't know what you're talking about. i didn't go anywhere near the fireplace. take him. i believe him. so do i. well, if he didn't cause the gas leak, that leaves one question. who did? ♪ that's made of leather. simmons: that doesn't belong in a fireplace. are those traction ridges? they are. it's from the sole of a shoe. yeah, the killer must've left it behind after he kicked the valve. so we find the shoe that matches... we find the killer. borrowed technology from ferrari to develop its suspension system? or what if we told you that ferrari borrowed technology from cadillac to develop its suspension system? magnetic ride control -- pioneered by cadillac, perfected in the 556-horsepower cts-v. we don't just make luxury cars. we make cadillacs. can the aetna app make you healthier? well, that all depends on what you do with it. and there's an awful lot you can do with it. access your medical history, view cl

mr. cambridge, one more question. you break the valve on the fireplace before or after the attack on derek? i don't know what you're talking about. i didn't go anywhere near the fireplace. take him. i believe him. so do i. well, if he didn't cause the gas leak, that leaves one question. who did? ♪ that's made of leather. simmons: that doesn't belong in a fireplace. are those traction ridges? they are. it's from the sole of a shoe. yeah, the killer must've left it behind after he kicked the valve. so we find the shoe that matches... we find the killer. borrowed technology from ferrari to develop its suspension system? or what if we told you that ferrari borrowed technology from cadillac to develop its suspension system? magnetic ride control -- pioneered by cadillac, perfected in the 556-horsepower cts-v. we don't just make luxury cars. we make cadillacs. >>> coming up tonight, they go into the bye week 3-1 after a win over the rams. we'll have locker room reactions. >>> they are all in the national political spotlight

earn a masters in philosophy, which is unusual but very welcomed in this field from cambridge university. he went, mr. president, as a harvard scholar. with degrees from two very prestigious institutions, he decideed to pursue his j.d. from yale law school where he graduated three years later. he earned the extraordinary distinction of being both editor-in-chief of the yale law review and the winner of the israel h. perez prize for the best written contribution to the law review. after graduating from yet another prestigious school -- yale law school -- he served as law clerk to the honorable patricia m. wald u.s. court of appeals of the district of columbia. then he also served as law clerk to the honorable byron white of the u.s. supreme court. clearly his academic and professional accomplishments have prepared him to handle the legal complexities of federal appellate cases. but, mr. president, all of these things, i think, can be put into context beautifully by comments from his judges that he will serve with should he be confirmed today by the senate. other justices on the court. james -- judge j

of course i know people who do know him in the cambridge community. i have not met mrs. to talk with them about the issues that i have been working on and how important i think they are to the future of america, especially a generation of young people who i come into contact with regularly as a professor. >> well, professor, hopefully they're watching, either obama family or the administration. you also write in your book that you received more than 25,000 letters from the public. that's really quite amazing -- since the clarence thomas hearings and that that has given you a sense of community and a sense of home. you write about this. are you surprised that those hearings 20 years ago still resonate with so many people? >> i'm absolutely surprised. i've been at conferences over the last couple of weeks where many women have talked about what was in fact unintended consequences of the hearing. this morning in fact i heard from a woman named jo ann smith who is working with young women in new york city. she met me over the weekend and just the kind of advocacy, as well as

mr. wolf but i did not need a call to know the something was happening because i found myself being evicted from my apartment in cambridge '08 winter early spring as a result of the mortgage foreclosure that foretold what was coming in and not very happy way but interesting. i like in the situation situation, summarized in the following way we needed fdr and got to obama. if you think about the differences, one of them that people talk about that has come up with leadership is fdr was at harvard and applied to the most excited -- exclusive sino club just a few blocks down and was rejected and his family was members and he came from a class who understood he did not need to be afraid to challenge the same class but obama's maybe better understood as someone who wants to be accepted by a the class. that may help to explain some of this the difference of that character but then there is a larger explanation that the individual character which is the political movement that arose about connected but is not seen as being committed to. >> give to let people feel and give voice to the paid the people a feeling around the countr

mr. deputy speaker, and, of course, whatever you said was very wise indeed, but to return to the point about the honorable member from cambridge, my point of order related to the use of twitter in the chamber in a course of the debate when he was disputing something that was being said from the dispatched box from another member. it's often a reasonable concern raised by opponents of this about how this could impact on the quality of debate, and i always thought if you have a point of dispute or a question about what's being said by somebody on the floor of the house of chamber at that time, then you should attempt to intervene before you start putting out a message to speaking to what they're saying. it's a curtesy and common sense which the right honorable member is calling for, the committee is calling for, in the recommendations they made to us today. now, i met yesterday, mr. deputy speaker, with a delegation from the school with the communist party of china in this house, and they were vest interested in what i had to say about communications and twitter and the way mp's use them. if i tell the house, they may not be sur

cambridge, massachusetts, at the politics at harvard. if you're black you're supposed to punch certain tickets. i disagree with mr.ith the fact that people somehow say, there's nothing wrong that 90% of blacks in this country vote for one political party. i wouldn't call it brainwashing, but i would look at it and say very strongly, why would 90% of one ethnic group for one party. if you had 90% of whites all voting for republicans. people would say, oh, republicans are racist. i think we need to move away from this black experience and white experience and talk about the things that unite us. >> okay, boyce, you get the last word. we don't have much time. what are we learning from this sort of debate that is going on in the country right now? >> well, i think that we're learning exactly what the other guest is referring to, which is that, you know, our motto, your black world. if no one way to be black. the idea is we have african-americans from all different backgrounds. to say that all black people think alike is the same to say that all white people think alike. herman cain has a right to be a conservative and