capito. congressman, welcome back to the "newshour". you spent almost four hours with mr.inson behind closed dos today. what did you learn today that led you to believe you urgently need more infmation about that complaint? >> there doesn't seem to be any dispute over the fact that this complaint is urgent and credible. that is apparently not the basis it's been withheld us. rather than the department of justice weighing in with the office of director of naional intelligence, that director is depriving us of the complaint because he says it's beyond his isrisdiction. that means that urgent matter is going unaddressed. it also means that someone is giving these marching orders to the director. f we want d out is the white house involved in that? we need to know, frthkly, whethewhite house is also a subject of the complaint because the idea that so could weigh in whoig's the subjt of the complaint and essentially quash it would cause, i think, the whistleblower statute to be meaningless. eere are two imperatives, one is photo find out e formation necessary to protect the cou