mrs. mueller.the dog is looking totally off in another direction. >> to the defense, it was clear. fred's story was entirely plausible and the prosecutions was not. >> why would he do this? why would a guy who was married for 27 years, with no history of violence, no history of any sort of domestic dispute, all of a sudden decide on his vacation that he was going to murder his wife with his bare hands? it just seems that part of the case seem so farfetched. >> friend after friend arrive from texas to support fred. even his in laws took the stand. leslie's own mother, jenny, vouch for her son former son-in-law's character. >> all those years, any signs of fred being abusive or violent? >> no, i never saw a sign in fred being violent. to anyone. >> and each of fred's children also face the jury to tell them about their parents long and happy marriage. ariel described one nightly routine. >> mom and dad walk to the pond that was in front of our house about 200 yards, holding hands and they would be ou

mr. death as mueller. mr. as well, or are you request present to ask a question?ometimes people turn the cameras off. [inaudible] one minute. mr. adult, if you are there, you can certainly go. it appears miss, mr. kilmer, that those members are not there. do you conform with that? >> apparently not. so, madam chair. >> so, if you'd like to make a closing summer statement, i'll make mine. >> sure. thank you. i appreciate the witnesses being here today and we've had a lot of difficulties in trying to get these appropriation bills complete and that's unfortunate. and while we're doing that we've seen our adversaries become bolder because because with this is provocative weaknesses broke out provocative. certainly the hasty withdrawal from afghanistan was a signal that do [inaudible] and even leave u.s. citizens behind. that was a very unfortunate situation. in our facing an unfortunate situation both in europe and taiwan. and there's a, if we could, our friend, mr. churchill said many years ago, the worst two words in the english language is, too late. so we have a r

mr. mueller's comments about personal electric vehicles in rule america and its potential challenges, includingpower outages. so today, i would like to focus more on the electrification of semis and medium and heavy duty trucks, which make up just 5% of vehicles in the country, but contribute 25% of vehicle greenhouse gas emissions and i believe 70% of particulate evolution. this in rural america is where we get the most bang for the buck. mr. strickland and mr. wood, i want to get to you on questions on struck tracking infrastructure. in my district, they invested in an electric bust system with an inductive charging system, which is amazing. the bus can come by, drive over, charge up for five minutes and get going again. i would imagine that's the kind of thing we will need for electric semis. mr. wood, do you have an opinion based on your experience about what's the smartest way is to develop charging infrastructure for buses and the semis and heavy to medium duty trucks? >> thank you for the question. what we have done a southern company thus far, especially to your question around electrif

being made public but the difference with this versus original russia probe unlike bob mueller's lawyers working for mrt there in 2016. but you know who was? joe biden, the current president and the president back then barack obama were both briefed by john brennan on the entire scheme. >> the person whose name was at the heart of this because a top clinton campaign advisor would be jake sullivan. there are a lot of questions about exactly what he knew and whether or not a new after the 2016 election they were using campaign money to potentially wanted her internet traffic coming out of this building where the service is supposed to be confidential. there were questions about exactly what he knew once he has an important job right now. leading the diplomatic effort to stop this russian invasion. >> brian: joe biden never has press conferences. when is the next time you can ask jake sullivan a question? >> i would think if russia does something this week in eastern europe, he will appear in the briefing room. >> ainsley: offering the questions, thanks, peter. the media, shockingly not covering this. abc

mr. trump survived years of scrutiny by the special counsel and the russian investigation. robert as mueller the third and two impeachments. despite a swirl of new investigation since he left office the former president remains the dominant force in republican politics. in fairness, we are learning new things that we didn't know during the impeachment. what's the point here, that we're not learning new things that fundamentally change everyone's thinking about what happened. we just have more details but we already know. we >> well, in many ways i think january six may be one of the most important historical that's to happen in my lifetime. that i've witnessed. in other ways, and because of that we need to learn as much as we can about it. how did it happen. who is behind. it who were the intellectual people coming up with the underpinnings of. it the plans of. it who of executing thinks, how did this all happen. how did thousands of people end up on the steps of the capitol in a violent attack that led to deaths, and to the interruption of one of the most sacred parts of our democracy. on t

mueller investigation. durham recently filed a motion in court there was apparently about potential conflicts of interest. as new york times writes, citing this filing, fox news inaccurately declare that mry company to really infiltrate a white house server. so, republicans like senator marshall blackburn are calling for an investigation of clinton. house minority leader kevin mccarthy pledged over open up an investigation, as journalist aircrew part points out, in fox news as breathless coverage last week, they mentioned clinton's name over 100 times. and a news of the deposition, twice. hillary clinton retweeted that same, kind of gives their game away. in an address, the new york state democratic convention, listen to the point you made at the end. >> fox, we charged with accusations against me counting on their audience to fall for it again. and as an aside, they are getting awfully close to actual malice in their attacks. >> that was intentional, that legal turn, actual malice, is and not too subtle pinch -- to say that they are crossing into libel or defamation lawsuit territory. if fox wanted to pretend they did not know too well that they were committing them of ally. john durham

mr. burchett for five minutes. >> thank you chair lady, this is for -- how do you say your names or is it mueller or mueller? >> it's -- congressman, thank you. you can call me tim. simple products, i believe is the models if i'm correct. i'm really concerned about the russian efforts to target undersea fiber optic cables. many of which are operated by private companies. i understand a lot is classified, but given the coast for his role in protecting the marine transportation system can you comment on our nation's ability to respond to cyberattacks in the infrastructure? >> congressman, our maritime transportation critical infrastructure is very and it's dependent on that infrastructure. there are substantial threats against the maritime critical infrastructure every day. so, that is why we but to gather -- excuse me, that is why we have operationalize our cybersecurity -- this threat and speed and pace at which it demands i can offer you a follow-up brief and we'll get the cables if you'd like sir. >> i would really like that. just out of curiosity, how many ribbons around her chest? >> congressman, i actua