mrs. napolitano: we have no speakers and i'm prepared to close. mr. hastings: we'll reserve. the chair: the gentlelady from california is recognized. napolitano thap thank you, mr. speaker. we heard -- mrs. napolitano: thank you, mr. speaker. we hear we need to work together. mr. bera said that. mr. denham says create your own. i thought this was the house of the people, that we were supposed to be working together. that's why we have such low ranking in the view of the american public is we continually fight against each other. we need to sit in dialogue and be able to converse, at least agree on things that are necessary, to be able to help our country back on its feet instead of fighting over what's not necessarily fightable about. mr. hastings, the chairman, talked about solutions, past legislation. like anything else, we don't get information about many of the bills until the last minute and i cannot get any hearings on some of my bills and neither can some of my members get hearings in the subcommittee or the full committee for being able to address some of these issues

mr. renzi is going to have the meeting with president napolitano.'s get out to jules who's also in rome. jules. >> reporter: thanks, ross. pardon me. start choking here. yes, he is expected to give matteo renzi the mandate to form a government here, the question is what next. there was speculation that he would take it back to florence to talk to his people there and work up just what the plan is going forward and how they address that. he may also meet the new center right leader, ang leino alfano to talk out further details of how this coalition works but, of course, another key element here is going to be mr. berlusconi and his part in the electoral reform process. the two have signed a deal to push this forward. i'm joined by a senator of the italia party, senator lucic milan. if he can produce on the reforms promised he'll be the best senator. >> if he does. if he does. we hope he will. we hope for the best for italy. what happened so far is not so encouraging because he has taken the place of mr. letta after weeks and months of promises of not

were seven different references to an individual basis only by janet napolitano who testified before judiciary .ommittee that's in there, mr. speaker. so that they can argue that it's not creating a class of people that are now exempted from the law. well, they create classes of people and they exempt them from the law and now they just -- that's the immigration piece of the violations. now it brings me to obamacare. and on obamacare, i can't keep track of the times that he's decided he's not going to enforce obamacare and he's going to change it or amend it. and the list is so full at this point, i don't know if anyone has memorized how many violations, how many changes that have come to the obamacare law because of the president's executive edicts that come down. but i would lay the foundation of this, mr. speaker, in the passage of obamacare itself. and in the stupak amendment. and i would like to take that discussion up in a moment. but i see that the chairman of the rules committee has arrived and i'd be happy to suspend for so long as might be required to do the business of ch chamber. -- this chamber. the speaker pr

mr. peters seems to be encouraging publicity for -- if you say this is wrong, get it off the air. judge napolitano an unwell person, and articulate person, fearless person, sympathetic person. meghan kelly looked in the camera. i did it on fox and friends. come on fox. this is not much of the stuart varney will have the here and we will interrogate you together. judge napolitano: stuart: do you think the congressman has a leg to stand on, what you said is inaccurate? is he saying that? judge napolitano: he has a defense to make to her claim but he has zero, not a scintilla as the president would say, not a smidgen to threaten television stations. stuart: will the judge take the place? will lead lawyer -- judge napolitano: the sec? absolutely not. absolutely not. first amendment was written to encourage broad robust open political debate. this doesn't come close to the line. stuart: you waited until the end to do the hand gesture. i like it. thank you. thank you very much. we already know google is getting into robots, artificial intelligence but now hacking into your brain? really? we will discuss

mrs. napolitano: thank you, mr. chairman. and i would invite my colleague -- able to move this we're handling drought. 98% of california, shown by this map, is in drought. we are entering the third year of drought. the driest on record in california. this bill, 3964, the sacramento-san joaquin valley emergency water delivery targets central california only, central valley, and was introduced one week ago with no hearing, no markup, nothing. it was introduced by republican california colleagues and no cooperation with the rest of california members who are facing similar drought impacts. it's similar in 1837 from 2011 and died in the senate, as was pointed out. according to the california department of resources, the snowpack in the sierras, the largest reservoir in the central valley system was 6% normal. the drought monitor found that 90% of the state is experiencing moderate to severe drought. so cry in california that the last -- first 18 days of january, the state saw 289