mrs. richard nixon, 1969 to 1974. and it was maintained that mrs. nixon represented the average woman. what do we think about that? >> who put that forth? >> they just purposely -- nixon knew even winning he wasn't the most popular of individuals. when he campaigned in '60, he actually said whatever you think of me, we all can agree that pat would be a wonderful first lady. it's like such an odd thing to say, but she was a lovely woman, a friendly woman who wasn't used nearly to the effect that she could have been by the white house because they just didn't understand her charm and the value and the power that she had. so they trotted her out as a symbol of the average housewife, and sort of tried to mold her into this look or this image of this -- she's just like you. >> well, and you think of when nixon talked about her republican cloth coat, that she was not the kind of person who was in a fancy fur coat, and then you compare that to all of the reports about mrs. kennedy shopping and spending thousands -- tens of thousands of dollars so mrs. kennedy said i would have had to buy sable

. >> i think mr. nixon is an effective leader of his party. i hope he would grant me the same. question before us is which point of view and which party do we want to lead the united states. >> mr. nixon, would you like to comment on that statement? >> i have no comment. >> if you are live on television and there is a camera right here, there is really no place to hide. once you see a guy sweating when asked a question, are you sure he is the leader for you? >> that's the question before the american people, and only you can decide what you want. what you want this country to be, what you want to do with the future. i think we're ready to move. >> if you saw it on television, clearly kennedy had won that debate. >> gentlemen, thank you very much for permitting us to present the next president of the united states on this unique program. >> it was the beginning of a new form of political craftsmanship. you could structure the message appropriately for the tv camera you could have a huge impact. and if you couldn't, you were toast. >> i'd like you to give a real tonight welcome t

mr. hess began his career in the eisenhower administration as a speechwriter and he joined presidents nixon his 1962 california gubernatorial bid. he returned to the white house in 1969 as the chief of staff to daniel patrick moynihan. they were in on the couple because moynihan was the urban affairs adviser democrats coupled with president nixon obviously republican. but the two are very loyal friends and made the relationship work began to mr. hess knew both of these. he's one of the few people that can say that he was close friends with both of these men. and it's the subject of his new book, "the professsor and the president daniel patrick moynihan in the white house peak well before we invite him to the stage we have a preview video to show. daniel patrick moynihan is assistant for the urban affairs. he was speaking at a rally for hubert humphrey scheduled on halloween night where they were predicting the end of the world and he was elected next week. >> mr. speaker the the president of the united states. >> it was close in 1968 and he was coming in with an opposition and he felt he ne

nixon says yes we have such a computer. brezhnev says mr. resident could you tell me what the names of our polar borough -- politburo members will be. there's a long pause. your computer is not sophisticated after all. nixon says no your question i cannot read it. nixon responds by saying well it is in chinese. [laughter] so the false assumptions you have listed in your book are number one engagement brings complete cooperation. i think you and i probably agree on that one. in my book i have made the same argument that this is a general assumption is special in the department that engagement needs cooperation and nobody gives a name margin for the other side manipulating the engagement. that's something i think that is interesting. the second false assumption you say is that china is on the road to democracy and you believe that is not the case. a the third assumption is that china is a fragile flower or it's not going to be militaristic. >> if you put pressure on china will collapse. >> then there's the assumption that china wants to be and

mr. johnson referred the current nexus study do not take into account g f a with off-street parking to change the basis of oozing how those fees are calculated would facility a new nixon nexus study to effected parties this ordinance didn't mention the impact fees will again be another conversation we talked it will be the time of the publication i received public comments and have e-mailed copies in reference to the exemption for projects in the van ness su d and if i may conclude to answer commissioner moore's question about the 25 foot parking this is actually in place under planning code section 1 61 b an exemption for off street loading across the sidewalks the supervisors is going to ask for off-street parking as well in your packet as part of the page 6 ordinance on line 5 so if i'm understanding this ordinance correctly in the instance where there is property that sold access across a wide sidewalk at 25 feet with more the zoning administrator will be able to wave the off-street parking requirement like the loading requirement that concludes my presentation. if you have any questions. >> opening it up for public comment good afternoon, commissioners i want to

mr. defazz yo said the trolls over at o.m.b. are delaying this. and can you describe your understanding of that process? >> let me back up for a second and say omb is a creature of the nixon administration back in the early 70's. and the idea was that any significant rule making that occurred in government would have to go through a very thorough look to ensure that we're not overregulating industry. so in some ways the process is designed to ensure that when rules do come out there's been a thorough look at whether there are alternatives or whether there's a better way to get there. so it's actually more out of the spirit of a regulate only as necessary environment that we have the system we have. i think one of the challenges we have going forward is that if you take the rate of change that technology is moving into, it's moving much quicker than our systems have historicically been able to move. and as we go into the future i think that's going to be an area that probably does need to be looked at. i don't know what the answers are but i know that there's an awful lot of very disruptive safety enhancing technology that is coming around the corner and we're going to hav

mr. president, it was a tough fight and honor running against you, why do you have to come up with excuses as to why he beat you? it sounds just a little petty. >> the first nixondy debate, nixon said to kennedy -- yeah, nixon said to kennedy, you had a great turnout in ohio. thank you for talking points. >>> let me finish with secretary clinton's new role in life, which has become a political identification in her life. you're watching "hardball," a place for politics. i love my shows, but i can't just sit around all day. that's why i have xfinity. their cloud based dvr lets me take everything i recorded, anywhere i go. which is perfect for me, [whispering] because i have responsibilities. ...i mean that's really interesting, then how do you explain these photos?! [people gasping] objection your honor. sustained. with the x1 dvr library you could take anywhere, xfinity is perfect for people on the go. >>> let me finish tonight with secretary clinton's role in life. many people pull back from the title of grandparent. they come up with nicknames. my wife kathleen likes to be called names that i brought back from the peace corps in swaziland. clinton is a grandm

mr. president, it was a tough fight and honor running against you, why do you have to come up with excuses as to why he beat you? it sounds just a little petty. >> the first nixon debate nixon said to kennedy -- yeah nixon said to kennedy, you had a great turnout in ohio. thank you for talking points. >>> let me finish with secretary clinton's new role in life which has become a political identification in her life. you're watching "hardball," a place for politics. can help guide your retirement savings. our experience is one reason 100% of our retirement funds beat their 10-year lipper averages. so wherever your long-term goals take you we can help you feel confident. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. you used to sleep like a champ. then boom... what happened? stress, fun, bad habits kids, now what? let's build a new, smarter bed using the dualair chambers to sense your movement, heartbeat, breathing. introducing the sleep number bed with sleepiqtm technology. it tracks your sleep and te

geraldford or richard nixon, when -- nixon carter, ronald reagan there was a willingness on both sides of the aisle to get in a car together and go down pennsylvania and say mr. president, you have you supered far too much -- usurped the constitution. we are taking a stand and we have missed that opportunity to act responsibly. but fortunately, it's not too late. this will act responsibly to say and if you don't what irresponsibility is then look at the judge's opinion. he spells it out. this president didn't even have the gumption and sign it. he spoke his new amnesty law into being and jeh johnson did a memo. that took the power of congress away from us. so the question on acting responsibly is, do we make that message clear? we're not having laws spoken into being in this country and having some bureaucrat unelected come around with a memo that undoes laws by different congresses all these years signed by different presidents. with a memo. come on. it's time to act responsibly. now is the time. i know party divisions run deep, but stand with us for the constitution. i yield back. >> the gentleman from texas reserves. the gentlewoman from california is rec

mr. president, reallocation was done in 1968 under president johnson, in 1970 under president nixon in 1978, 1979 and 1980 under president carter 1982, 1983, 1984 under president reagan and 1994 1997, and 2000 under president clinton. in other words this is a commonplace procedure which has happened under democratic and republican presidents in an absolutely noncontroversial way. interestingly, of the 11 times that funds were reallocated it turns out that on five occasions it was the disability fund that was reallocated to help the retirement fund. in other words money was shifted from disability to the retirement fund. this time it is going the other way. mr. president, at the interesting committee hearing yesterday, a number of colleagues republicans and democrats, made the point that the reallocation of funds in order to prevent a 19% cut in disability benefits was a short-term solution, that it was not going to solve the overall issue of how do we fund social security for our kids and our grandchildren. and that point is clearly right. no one can argue with that. what we have got to do