five minutes, mr. olson. >> thank you, urn. may it please the court. >> if i've got your argument right just now, just say yes. otherwise forget it. >> you had it right before. >> no, but i had it right just now? okay. forget it. forget it. >> mr. olson, i do have a question following up on what the chief asked earlier. the respondent says that new jersey legislature is doing exactly what he thinks they shouldn't do or wouldn't do. which is that they are considering legislation that would fully repeal the sports betting prohibitions. and i understand it's being concerted by both houses. where does the consideration stand right now? >> well, i don't know where it stands. and i think it's utterly irrelevant. >> no, but you argued to us that no state legislature would do that. but here we have two bills introduced that would do just that. >> well, they have not -- they are not laws yet. and what i said was congress could not possibly have intended in a bill to prohibit the expansion of sports betting to have it construed in a way.

the legislature -- >> just the way you say that, mr. olson, the federal government is saying to the state, you can't do something. so that sounds to me, the language of preemption all the time, the federal government takes some kind of action, passes a law, and then says to the states, you know what. we've got this. you can't do anything. >> it is so fundamental at the constitutional convention and discussed in most detail in the new york case, that the difference is that in those circumstances where congress has taken the step of regulating commerce, it can preclude state efforts that interfere with that or conflict with that. but when it sets out at the initiative, at the first stage of regulating the legislature, here we have a situation where a court has ordered pursuant to my opponent's briefs, ordered, told new jersey you can't repeal a statute that you have tried to repeal. you must keep it -- >> do you see no difference between the federal government saying to a state, look, you can't take some preferred policy option that you would l

mrs. olson, can me, has the i.r.s. changed the way it is implement the affordable care act? many times on "washington journal" the only way for them to collect a was to withhold my refund. month ago i got a letter asking me to file amended showing proof of payment or pay penalty. the do they do to affordable care act? one more thing, new tax law, 2018 the penalty fw away in or would i wait until 2020 to avoid that penalty? thank you. guest: okay, first on penalty tis my understanding and believe studying the act the same time as everybody else, very large bill. go away for -- the tax year 2018 for the returns in 2019.are filing my understanding is it going yearfor returns of the tax 2019 for the returns that you'd 2020.ling in if i'm wrong, somebody can correct me, but that is my understanding of it. terms of implementation, the law says that the only way the collect is by either basically offsetting the refund payments.rs making you have a refund of your regular tax return and the they will off

you, mrs. olson, i want to ask three quick questions. number one, i'm disabled and i don't have a computer, will i get be able to call and tax forms from the government? it was very hard the last two of phone calls until i finally got through, number one. two, has anything really changed from last year or will i use d deductions, 1040-a, i'm retired, and have just social bit of and little pension. yeah. these two things, i was get ring, how does one through this if they're not going to be able to get the forms through the mail anymore, have of us don't computers. host: thanks, caller. guest: you raise a critically question. my office did research study this year and we identified are 41 million u.s. taxpayers, based on nationwide sample ofpresentative taxpayers who filed returns within the last three years, are actively taxpayers. 41 million u.s. taxpayers that have broad-band access in their home. they are doing dial-up. 14 million re are .s. taxpayers that have no internet access in their home. here is disabled are a large percentage o

mr. olson. >> thank you chief justice, and may it please the court. one of the most important decisions made at the constitutional convention in 1787 was replacing the failed confederacy that governed states with a national government that could regulate individuals but not states. in the words of this court in the new york case, congress may regulate interstate commerce directly, but it may not regulate state's regulation of

mr. olson: mr. speaker, the of e of my hometown sugarland, texas, are amazing. last thursday something terrible happened on the road i drive every day at home. interstate 69. an 18 wheeler jackknifed during heavy rain. it flew off an overpass, crashing down on a small toyota camry. look, that camry is about three feet tall. the first miracle, the driver, was still alive. that day, iracle her name is lawrie, laurie's trained to be a nurse. across the street at the university of houston sugarland. the crash happened right in front of her. crawled through broken metal glass and got karen out. urie shows the best in texas and my hometown of sugarland, and i'm proud to call her my boss in congress. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the and my hometown the gentlewoman from puerto rico eek recognition? miss gonzalez colon: i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentlewoman is recognized for one minute. miss garciaparra colon: -- miss gonzalez-colon: 40% of our people still

mrs. olsoncan me, has the i.r.s. changed the way it is implement the affordable care act? many times on "washington journal" the only way for them to collect a was to withhold my refund. month ago i got a letter asking me to file amended showing proof of payment or pay penalty. the do they do to affordable care act? one more thing, new tax law, 2018 the penalty fw away in or would i wait until 2020 to avoid that penalty? thank you. guest: okay, first on penalty tis my understanding and believe studying the act the same time as everybody else, very large bill. go away for -- the tax year 2018 for the returns in 2019.are filing my understanding is it going yearfor returns of the tax 2019 for the returns that you'd 2020.ling in if i'm wrong, somebody can correct me, but that is my understanding of it. terms of implementation, the law says that the only way the collect is by either basically offsetting the refund payments.rs making you have a refund of your regular tax return and the they will offse

chairman, i'm pleased to yield a minute to the gentleman from texas, mr. olson. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized for one minute. mr. olson: i thank my friend from new jersey for allowing me to join this important debate. my friends on the other side are showing why the people, american ople, like root canals, head lice, colonoscopies, more than congress. it brings an act that hurts our youth and poverty. congressional democrats are going to vote against basic health care for these needy kids. the schip program is their only choice for their health. nearly half a million young texans, half a million, depend upon schip. it expired september 30 of this year. this bill tonight we vote on will extend schip for six more years. i beg my colleagues, listen to your hearts, to your soul and the voice of these kids who want basic health care. vote for schip today. vote for the c.r. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from new jersey reserves. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. the ge

mr. olson: mr. speaker, the men and women who defend our country have one sacred creed. and they all come home. days, 72 years and 234 . t they at houston cemetery at 16, he left texas to fight the nazis in germany in world war ii. he was a buffalo soldier. all-black division of ourrmy. he never returned to see his family. his in 1945. but could not be identified. lonnie was known as unknown x193. in 2016, his remains were identified and and this morning, he was laid to eternal rest. elcome home soldier. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. for what purpose does the gentleman from california seek recognition? >> permission to address the house for one minute and revise and extend. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> mr. speaker, character assassination is donald trump's favorite trick when people make him look bad. they have been smearing the authors of the dossier which exposes of trump-russia connections. they are cking steele diverting attention and impugn the f

. >> mr. olson, five minutes. >> modern day slavery. it happens in my hometown, sugarland, texas. slaving for sex and labor. it is ugly, offensive but real. law enforcement people back home say it doesn't exist but it does. april 2016 back home. a high school senior, very attractive disappeared at night working out at a local gym 500 yards in the heart of sugarland. she had just turned 18. she was a legal adult. her father knew unless he found her in 30 days she would likely be gone forever. luckily he had resources to hire seals, green berets and put a full on onslaught on social media. he got her back. that situation had been planned for two years. she befriended the so called groomer when she was 16. he used snap chat to kmcommunice with her, give her drugs, get her hooked, keep that from her parents. he was lucky they got their daughter back and so was my family. last june my daughter went to south africa on an overseas study program with her college. no one told us that was a hot bed for human trafficking. the students had to walk about half a mile from the dormitory to the c

chairman, i'm pleased to yield a minute to the gentleman from texas, mr. olson. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized for one minute. mr. olson: i thank my friend from new jersey for allowing me to join this important debate. my friends on the other side are showing why the people, american ople, like root canals, head lice, colonoscopies, more than congress. it brings an act that hurts our youth and poverty. congressional democrats are going to vote against basic health care for these needy kids. the schip program is their only choice for their health. nearly half a million young texans, half a million, depend upon schip. it expired september 30 of this year. this bill tonight we vote on will extend schip for six more years. i beg my colleagues, listen to your hearts, to your soul and the voice of these kids who want basic health care. vote for schip today. vote for the c.r. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from new jersey reserves. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. the ge

mr. olson: mr. speaker, sometimes lives matter by the inch. last month, for the manville manufacture risks, their dream came down to 12 inches, one foot. that's how close they came to winning every football game they played in 2017, including the texas 5-a division one state championship. was manville disappointed with their loss? heck, yes. did we shed some tears? heck, yes. i was more proud than ever of our guys, hell, yes. that pride comes from how they played, win or lose. exemplar pride is next to me. that's our team listening to our senior quarterback, chasen martin, his final words as a member of the manufacture risks, case's words rang through then and rang through for all eternity. he said i'm forever manville. i don't care what the score board says, we are the champions. hoca hay! i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentlewoman from texas seek recognition? ms. jackson lee: permission to address the house for one minute. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. the gentlewoman from is recognized for one

chairman, i'm pleased to yield a minute to the gentleman from texas, mr. olson. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from texas is recognized for one minute. mr. olson: i thank my friend from new jersey for allowing me to join this important debate. my friends on the other side are showing why the people, american ople, like root canals, head lice, colonoscopies, more than congress. it brings an act that hurts our youth and poverty. congressional democrats are going to vote against basic health care for these needy kids. the schip program is their only choice for their health. nearly half a million young texans, half a million, depend upon schip. it expired september 30 of this year. this bill tonight we vote on will extend schip for six more years. i beg my colleagues, listen to your hearts, to your soul and the voice of these kids who want basic health care. vote for schip today. vote for the c.r. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman's time has expired. the gentleman from new jersey reserves. the gentlewoman from new york is recognized. the ge

smith: thank you very much, mr. olson, for those very strong comments and i feel the same way about your great leadership. d i yield to andy biggs from arizona 5. mr. biggs: mr. speaker, thank you and thank you for yielding time to me and leadership on this issue. h.r. 4712. i was a young man in high school when the roe versus weighed decision came down. it reig nighted the moment. my mother and future mother in law began working on this. seeing their example, my wife, my family protected many. we worked for pro-life causes, internationally and in the state legislature and the state legislature we passed dozens of pro-life bills and since 2009, arizona has promoted the protection of unborn babies. arizona was maimed the top pro-life state in the union. even so, arizona is not without problems. i dedicate my support to h.r. a to a mother who faked serious illness. she sursifed the abortion but she wasn't given any medical attention. doctors, nurses and presumably her mother led her live go away after one hour and 18 minute

colleague from texas who is not paying attention talking about the next streak, and then the next photo mr. olsone you paying attention, i think you for correcting the record and starting a new streak. resell your tweet earlier. i know they would appreciate that. thank you one of the costliest energy and environmental regulations from the obama administration is when will address the targets fuel efficiency for cars and light trucks. the estimated total cost in excess of $200 billion by 2025. march will show up in higher sticker prices for new vehicles. we know that this is based on inaccurate places another assumptions that are off the mark. it's time to review the rules to suit their good deal for consumers they can be improved upon. the so-called midterm evaluation regulation finalized included stricter standards on the to 2025. more than a decade in the future. we decided to revisit midway through to see if standards need to be adjusted in light of changed circumstances. in 2016 they're poised to make a final decision. after the election they accelerated the timeline and rushed it out the doo

mr. fitzgerald: so -- so you may, your honor, be -- it sounds like you are describing a difficult case of fourth amendment standing or right to object. this court has very clearly said in minnesota versus olson that the overnight guest has the right to object. and that's the status in this case at minimum. i mean, really it's his family. it's the mother of his child, his child who lives there and she is the lessee. he spends several nights a week there. on the other end of the spectrum, minnesota versus carter, being in a place for a couple of hours just to do business would not create a right to object. so to the extent that connection to the property -- connection to the curtilage would be treated the same way as connection to the house. justice alito: did -- coming back to justice -- to the question, did we say in jardines that the curtilage is to be treated the same as the house for all fourth amendment purposes? i thought the issue in jardines was whether -- was whether officers who did not have probable cause were permitted to walk up to the front of the house, at which point they acquired probable cause. mr. fitzgerald: well, yes, your honor. so jardines identified a search and it ide