mrs. patriarch. she had these old north beach and mission horse cars that she essentially left revealed on the upper floor. she put pillows and hammocks up there so guests could stay up and look at the ocean from the car up above. this house sort of became like the winchester mystery house. it kept growing and growing, and having more additions and more cars annexed on to it. so at one point it has up to 10 cars. you can see they're using old dash signs or destination signs for fencing, actually, here in the front. so everything gets recycled in carville. later mrs. patriarch's bed and breakfast becomes an episcopal church called st. andrew's by the sea. so here it is in that incarnation. in the back there's a shed there. that's the sunday school, it says. you can see the fence. it was necessary to sort of fight the sand and keep it at bay. it's another pretty famous house on the great highway. it looks sort of like a mechanist myian temple or something. it kept being boxy and then growing. it's in t

. >> at the patriarch's residence in nicosia, like mrs. can be seen everywhere. he was once an archbishop, and after 1959, the first president of the republic of cyprus. church vehicles are housed in a special parking garage. one of them, said to be a gift from john f. kennedy, is known as the big mac. but the church was already a political force before that, even back in in times. and it will influence, especially the part of the church that feels compelled to express itself on political issues, and the politicians react. it continues to have influence because the political parties held -- help the people elect the bishop. >> the church collects donated food. during the crisis, people have been particularly dependent on its support. many see the church as its savior during a time of need.

mr. hannity. just listen to him and patriarch author, jim sensenbrenner. you an exchange with them. >> there is a liberal website out there. and they say that i have change mid opinion. now, i supported the patriot act. i support datamining. i support surveillance, and i support fisa courts. but i don't support what the administration did. am i consistent with what the law is? >> you absolutely are consistent. and i agree with every one of the points that you have made, sean. >> now, this is jim sensenbrenner, one of the authors of the patriot act. if he is being consistent, what is the objection? what are they talking about, or is this just some politics? >> it's politics. sean hannity is not being consistent here. he is being hypocritical. you know, what we know that is happening that has caused this scandal, this controversy, it's nothing new in the sense that usa today wrote about the telephone stuff back in 2005-2006. the datamining, wired magazine just this past march did a big story about the utah nsa datamining complex that's been constructed. it's

mr. speaker, she would understand that, as we all do. in a family, you want more influence. if the patriarch of the family is the one who writes the rules you grate a little underneath that. that's a natural thing to always try to grab more power. they knew it was human nature system of they set up this balance between the three branches of government. . but they envisioned that each branch of government would protect its constitutional authority and not concede it to the use of some other branch of government. they envisioned that congress would try to grow in its influence in authority and they gave the president veto power so he could veto the overreach potentially of the house and the senate together. they balanced the house and the senate so that this hot cup of coffee or hot cup of tea they were thinking here in the house of representatives, which can be a quick reaction for us when things go wrong in america, a new crop of house members come in with the freshest of vigor that comes from the american people, and they set about changing things. that's a two-year election cycle. we saw t