mrs. tanner talked about herself.he talked about how wonderful tell is to be where hoe is living what about the other people the other communities the people that are manage every week with projects andmenting to be heard in and the block of -- 4-5 there. deny the projects all the time. she is talking about equity but not to the people in the community. and building equity from planning department. i think it is a bit of doing lip service to the project and i don't see that -- that -- the housing element is more than lip service as well. thank you. i'm a district 10 residents and chirp of the bay vow cac. i want to report rachael continuer's nomination for planning i met her had the planning department was considering a like of a cal tran station in the bay vow. vanish important topic to the community and rachael upon sundayed with moiz and a few members and the community to hear our concerns and w with us. . the best way to proceed. did not get excited and irrelevant took effort to analyze everything. now a walking t

tanner was not asked to sign a resignation letter and mr. brown was. we have no idea what her sort of criteria is. does she feel like ms. tanner will never disagree with her even if it's not her own personal belief to vote one way or another, but that mr. brown has an independent streak and that needs to be reigned in. i simply don't know. so, we are all being placed between a rock and hard place here. i have a question for the city attorney because like supervisors melgar, stefan and mandelman, i came here prepared to vote to confirm their appointment. if we voted them down because we are forced to vote on it today and if we understand the mayor's use in the past to request or not a resignation letter, could she then just reappoint them and then we could expeditiously bring them back to committee for a vote. >> you certainly could. you can bring them back to the planning. if you voted to not approve them, you can vote for them and send them through the process again. >> assuming she did expect them to be voted for. can she continue serving on the commi

tanner was not asked to sign a resignation letter and mr. brown was. we have no idea what her sort of criteria is. does she feel like ms. tanner will never disagree with her even if it's not her own personal belief to vote one way or another, but that mr. brown has an independent streak and that needs to be reigned in. i simply don't know. so, we are all being placed between a rock and hard place here. i have a question for the city attorney because like supervisors melgar, stefan and mandelman, i came here prepared to vote to confirm their appointment. if we voted them down because we are forced to vote on it today and if we understand the mayor's use in the past to request or not a resignation letter, could she then just reappoint them and then we could expeditiously bring them back to committee for a vote. >> you certainly could. you can bring them back to the planning. if you voted to not approve them, you can vote for them and send them through the process again. >> assuming she did expect them to be voted for. can she continue serving on the commi