now mrs. thomas is closest bassio's back in plenty to claim a, b c. d as in the phone. so we need to play mccord tcm for us. i don't maybe search for felicia to put to another level of express. you got them and save you into a much better business unit. so be less. it was on this and food in a base. it isn't a fuser. it doesn't give us a bone cell spread on it. tina those say this this, this is he he hours he has done most work was your so yeah, of course was telling me he could pop up to the media to protect journalist because when i, when i went ahead check acidic i like the fence. i know the deli, with that explanation yield, i spoke with significant other a to castle eve to cut them in the discipline. young l. e. a. peter, this is the algebra. feel now come to fulfill public komatsu to class for letting us young. good dinner. m, o v, as in latisha clinical benefited, are let ellis, uncle michel knuckles at n thought. you end up with seattle de la, and i guess, okay, i see them well, the esl teacher piano, they'll be in a federal out a kiss or kisse. i will send okay

mr. thomas director of the arizona department of water resources the chair now recognizes you for five minutes on mute. we are going to try to fix the audio. let's give this just a moment. we can have mr. peter nelson from california ready on deck it's had a devastating impact in 2022 arizona will lose 18% of its total colorado river entitlement the tribes and municipal water users will result and they have come together to provide financial resources and wet water to partially mitigate those impacts. the likelihood is high and in 2023 arizona may lose an additional in mitigation for those reductions is unlikely. in august projections triggered a consultation provision in the lower basin plan. the actions we've taken to date are not enough. arizona, nevada and california have been looking to do more. official actions have two categories, mandatory cuts or additional conservation. arizona's goal this conservation and not greater cuts. tribal and nontribal partnerships will achieve that goal. for the last two decades we have learned valuable lessons for managing the colorado river and they inclu

mr. thomas and the chair recognizes him for five minutes. >> and you're muted. >> okay. we're going to try to fix the audio. let's give it just a moment. we can have mr. peter nelson from the colorado river board of california ready on deck if we can't get the audio fixed. >> and chairman, can you hear me now? >> there you go. we've got you loud and clear. thank you for providing an opportunity to testify today on behalf of the state of the arizona. the droughts have had devastating impacts on the colorado river in 2022, arizona will lose 18% of its total colorado river entitlements, impact to tribal uses, and water will result. arizonians have come together to provide financial resources and wet weather to partially mitigate those impacts. the likelihood of deeper cuts is high and in 2023, arizona may lose additional 80,000 acre seat and mitigation for those reductions is unlikely. in august, projections of lake mead triggered a consultation in the lower drought and contingency plan. arizonans have met and plan to do more. and they fall into two categories, mandatory cut

mrs. general thomas jonathan jackson. stonewall jackson has a passion for artillery. he really likes it when he sees artillery well handled. the battle of gaines mill pelham comes in with two cannons on the left of jackson's line. one gun drakes according to reports so it could have been caused in battle. things are going on with this one gun. pelham dismounts and helps to fight the remaining cannons that are out there. he brought to field batteries to a hault. jackson saw that and was very impressed. jackson said three more batteries over to the position to help pelham asked who he is and insists upon meeting came after the battle. pelham is mentioned in stuart in jackson's battlefield report and he goes on to some other feeds in the peninsula campaign including battling near white house landing firing on mcclellan's army. the peninsular campaign of seven day battle as a testing ground for pelham. how does he and his battery fit into the calvary and into the rest of his army and what are some tactics and what are some things that work with his guns on these battlefie

justice thomas: mr. feigin, one question before you get too deep into your argument.st should we use? the first circuit said that it was exercising its supervisory authority. what test should we use to review that exercise of authority or to limit that authority? mr. feigin: well, i think there are two separate questions there, justice thomas, that the court would need to consider, and deciding either one of them in our favor or deciding that the application of the rule was harmless error would result in a judgment in the government's favor here. but the first question, reviewing the supervisory rule, is whether the court of appeals had the power to enact the rule at all, and the second is whether this court, exercising its own supervisory power, would find that rule reasonable. as to the first question, i think the fundamental problem with this rule is that it divests district courts of discretion that this court has repeatedly insisted that they have over jury selection. if you look at, for example, page 424 of the court's decision in mu'min against virginia, the co

. >> justice thomas, anything further? please. >> mr. fletcher, should we be thinking about this as a reynolds case for an intel case? in my mind, your claim of state secrets really undermines the foundation of reynolds. i am hesitant to call it a reynolds case. i think it's an intel case. >> we are content for you to think of it as either. if you are not willing to decide the privilege question all the way or take it as far as you could, perfectly appropriate disposition would be to say at a minimum, the circumvention of the process and burdensome nature of the discovery that would have to happen would still carry risks of disclosing secret information. >> even with intel it would still be a necessity. >> we are not indicating about u.s. rights but seeking evidence for our foreign proceeding. >> thank you. >> justice kagan? >> this idea of using codewords, given that the petitioner was detained in two separate locations, isn't there a way of enabling this information to go forward without saying which of the two locations this treatment

thomas, anything further? [inaudible conversations] >> mr. fletcher, should we be thinking about this as a reynolds case or a, an intel case? in my mind, your claim of state secrets really undermines the foundation of reynolds. ask so i'm hesitant -- and so i'm hesitant to call it a reynolds case. i think it's an intel case. >> more content to have you think of it as either. however, it's both, and they dovetail as you and i discussed. but it you are not willing to decide the privilege question all the way or to take it as far as we would take it, then i think a perfectly appropriate position would be to say at a minimum the intrusion and burden many nature of the discovery that would have to happen and that would still carry risks of or -- >> well, even in intel it's also a necessity, which is a question that i'm going to ask your adversary. >> you're right, exactly. and we're not talking about u.s. rights, we're talking about just seeking evidence for a foreign proceeding cans cat goringly a lesser -- >> justice kagan? >> just again on this

mr. speaker. i rise today to honor the life of thomas strayer nelson who turns 100 years old today. mr. nelson is one of the last living survivors of the attack on pearl harbor. he joined the navy right out of high school and was assigned to the u.s.s., a clemson class destroyer that was docked on pearl harbor in 1941. he left the navy as a first class electricians maid. but on that fateful day 80 years ago, 19-year-old thomas nelson was lying in his bunk aboard the ship when the alarms sounded. sensing trouble, tom made it top side where he saw several japanese planes bombing american ships. he quickly assessed this was not a drill. tom quickly jumped on his 50 caliber -- .50 caliber machine gun to help defend the ship and its crew that day. the record was devastating. nearly 20 u.s. ships were damaged or sank at sea. and more than 2,400 americans, including civilians, were killed. tom remembers crying that day after the aftermath. but tom's heroism did not stop there. nearly one year later in december, 1942, the ship was escorting a convoy when it was knocked off its tracks and two mi

with a new story and abuse me down, thomas and my mom is really starting to see she can contact her community. i. why shot them ish also what you said, but also the at mr. beam is a a t a mr. barb items over salvation. done spanish like no they haven't came after us yet. when gave them have say so can get and i would was matters done by dish off with a bundle of mid game with a mid martin. good. the marsh met, not by israel is anointed you not like her anger soon. student the chefs may not, should they offer me harm, some minor price or sponsors, komatt dunbar, playstation like comp letter or clean t i nuclear. dance one? no. on some look. it's finished by phone, from sponsor show and done how much my team i a business in the let's bring to software from our us next. i'm a good good stuff. yeah, it's the 1st one comes from the mountains of resemble my brother michael life. ownership. the list of a miss melvin is commissioners and then i got a number with this is with a lot of shots. i don't, i mean i don't, we don't sign on to not sponsor or somebody will become something as much as it was to flesh with washington muzzle issue and i was will give you s

mr. cooper's militants on his mother's side. brookings aesthetician senior fellow thomasight discusses a global impact of the covid-19 pandemic on security, economics and foreign policy. and later on a weekly author interview series "after words," entrepreneur vivek ramaswamy argues that corporate america is signing on to woke culture to increase profits. consult your program guide for more schedule information or visit booktv.org. here's anderson cooper and katherine howe. >> tonight cnn anchor and "new york times" best-selling author

mr. cooper's militants on his mother's side. brookings aesthetician senior fellow thomas wright discusses a global impact of the covid-19 pandemic on security, economics and foreign policy. and later on a weekly author interview series "after words," entrepreneur vivek ramaswamy argues that corporate america is signing on to woke culture to increase profits. consult your program guide for more schedule information or visit booktv.org. here's anderson cooper and katherine howe. >> tonight cnn anchor and "new york times" best-selling author anderson cooper chronicles the rise and fall of a legendary american dynasty, his mother's family, the vanderbilts. he is doing by katherine howe, i knew the times best-selling author of historical fiction and academic who brings her keen research skill and narrative flair to the story of an extraordinary family. and now without further ado i would like to welcome our guests to the virtual stage. >> hello. >> hello, hello, hello. thank you so much everyone. such a pleasure to be here. anderson, olympic it's nice to see. >> it's good if y

mr. feigin: i think there are two separate questions justice thomas that the court would need to consider, and deciding either one of them in our favor or deciding the application of the rule was harmless error would result in a judgment in the government's favor here. first question reviewing the supervisory rule is whether the court of appeals and the second is whether this court exercising its own power reasonable. i think the fundamental problem with this rule is it has discretion that this report -- this court has repeatedly said they have over jury selection. if you look over the dishes in, the court emphasizes not only in constitutional review but also in exercising supervisory power over the federal courts, it has given district courts wide discretion over jury selection because they are there and they can see the jurors and they are individually questioned and a are -- and are familiar with conditions. as to the second inquiry, i think the main point here would be although such questions can be helpful in some cases, they are not invariably helpful. the district court had sound r

thomas was living proof. as a wise man they would like say all man can't did. he sure. mr.nderson's grandson cla helped bury him. [applause] >> you know, it is even more impressive when you remember courageous and determined person is also famously one of the most unselfconscious people i washington. in fact, after watchin of these years i am tempted to post a new standard here tonight. the senate should only confirm the kinds of men and who in their dramatic final confirmation vote is taking place decide to turn off the tv and take a bath. [laughter]yon peo tailgating out of an rv and rubbing elbows at [applause] that is a standard that i could get behind. of course, at the campaign intimidate and pressure this justice did not stop. did not stop when the gavel fell the next year, the still fuming new york times smeared him as the youngest, cruelest justice. the hectoring never lets the justice did not break or bent. this is aarticular quality that i want to focus on. this core value was not linking outspending not allowing for judicial office to be compromised by an approp

thomas: not for me. justice kagan: if i understand your argument correctly, it really does all come down to this to. . is this correct? mr. kuhn: i -- down to these two hats. is this correct? mr. kuhn: even if you disagree with us on two hats the attorney general cannot have appealed. justice kagan: if you assume the attorney general could have appealed that it comes down to the two hats. ? mr. kuhn: that's correct -- the two hats. ? mr. kuhn: that's correct. justice kagan: it seems to me the secretary's role in this entire litigation pretty much proves that the two hats theory does not work, because your theory was that the attorney general was stepping in for the secretary who was representing the state's interest. but the secretary was sued in his capacity as a state official who could enforce state law doesn't it come down to the same thing, the secretary was sued because he could enforce state law and interest you're nobody else was doing that. so the two seem completely intertwined and the secretary's role in litigation prior to the attorney general's motion approves that, doesn't it? no, -- mr. kuhn: no, it doesn'

along with thomas massey regarding the instance and haven't gotten a response from the department of justice. will you commit to respond? >> gentleman's time has expired. ms. bass. >> thank you, mr. chair. attorney general garland, in 2014, 12-year-old tam area rice was fatally shot by a cleveland police officer. despite multiple requests from prosecutor in the civil rights division to investigate this shooting the case stalled without approval from d.o.j. officials who had political concerns about high visibility police misconduct cases. ultimately department officials essentially ran the clock out on the statute of limitations for federal obstruction of justice charges. that following december, a whistleblower and barr ended the department's inquiry into the killing. this year the family wrote a letter requesting the department reopen the inquiry into her murd and convene a grand jury. according to a department spokesperson the letter has been received. i wanted to know if you could tell us today if the department has reviewed the letter and if you know when the department will respond to this request to reopen the inquiry? >> when the department receives a letter like that it

thomas sankara, the country's former president. many in the country had thought they would never see this day. 14 people are facing justice 34 years after sankara was killed. mrara become president. this is mr compaore, he's among the accused but he is currently in exile in neighbouring ivory coast, where he fled after being forced to resign during mass protests in 2014. he denies involvement in sankara's death. 14 defendants have been charging the trial and so far 12 have been present in the trial. one of them being a general who served as a former presidents chief of staff. he was present in court today and we saw him donned in military attire as well as a doctor who was accused of holding forging documents saying he died of natural causes. some of the people who have been charged in accenture is a former president who is in exile on ivory coast as well as a man who served as a part of his guide and he is currently on the run. he was in powerfor overfour years but he led the most radical series of reform in africa at that time. he reduces on salary and that of all his public servants. he banned the use of government so chauffeurs education was a key priorit