mrs. toensing or mr. digenova.s is point to help you understand the white house's efforts to coerce the ukraine to announce the investigation the president wanted. the records would also show how the president's personal political agenda became more important than policies to help america's national security interests. the president's counsel made consistent with his prior attempts to hide evidence assert that attorney client privilege would cover the documents. the president's personal attorney client privilege cannot shield evidence of misconduct in office or that of his aides or lawyer's participation in corrupt schemes. we are not asking for documents reflecting legitimate legal advice. you need documents about their actions to pressure ukraine to announce an investigation to president trump's political opponent. there's a set of white house documents that relate directly to the president's unlawful decision to withhold $391 million appropriated bipartisan to help ukraine. witnesses have testified that presiden

. >> mr. digenova and miss toensing were going to become his lawyers to effectuate this trade?t. >> and you were supposed to broker this? >> correct. >> and what's this $100,000 a month? >> that was expenses for them. >> that's what you were supposed to negotiate that this is what you'd get paid? >> correct. >> were you getting paid in this interaction too? >> mine is not in there. they were getting a million dollars plus $100,000 a month on expenses. and mine was 200,000. >> and what is this here? what's that next line? is that the founder of burisma? >> zluceski and -- the ukraine ledger. yeah. >> what are you supposed to be getting about burisma and the ukraine ledger from lanny davis and mr. firtash? >> supposedly john solomon said there was stuff in mr. firtash's case about that. >> that's why this was all in conversation with mr. giuliani. >> correct. >> announcing the biden investigation. and talking about getting firtash off in this justice department prosecution, these were connected. >> it was all connected. at the end of the day it was to -- the agenda was to make su

mr. giuliani, miss toensing or mr.d in mr. giuliani's efforts to coerce ukraine to announce the investigations that the president wanted. the records would also show how the president's personal political agenda became more important than policies to help america's national security interests. the president's counsel may consistent with with his prior attempts to hide evidence assert that attorney/client privilege would cover these documents. but the president's personal attorney/client privilege cannot shield evidence of misconduct in office or that of his aides or his lawyers' participation in corrupt schemes. we aren't asking for documents reflecting legitimate legal advice. you need documents about their actions to pressure ukraine to announce an investigation into president trump's political opponent. there is a set of white house documents that relate directly to the president's unlawful decision to withhold $391 appropriated bipartisan to help ukraine. witnesses have testified that president trump directly order

journalist, john solomon, and two fox news lawyers, joe digenova and victoria toensing, and rudy giuliani and lev parnas are all involved in mr's telling in an effort to enlits help of a billionaire kremlin-connected allegedly mopped up oligarch to help them pressure the ukrainian government that they must announce investigations of joe biden. and the o'oligarch and his team tells this motley crew that he can help them with that, with getting that from the ukrainian government, he can also help them discredit the mueller investigation. they say that will be great, what we have to offer you in exchange is we can help stop you from being extradited to the united states to face felony corruption charges from the u.s. department of justice. "washington post" just this afternoon reports that mr. giuliani's involvement with mr. firtash and mr. firtash's sort of team appears to be an ongoing concern, that appears to be live. lev parnas said today his group's advocacy to get the case dropped against mr. firtash did go all the way to attorney general william barr. and he says that attorney general barr was more widely read in on what

president zelensky on may 13 and 14 along with victoria toensing in his capacity as personal attorney to president trump and with his knowledge and consent. mr. giuliani confirmed the wakss regard to ukraine stating, he knows what i'm doing. as his lawyer, my only client is the president of the united states. he's the one i have an obligation to report. to tell him what happened. president trump repeatedly instructed senior ukrainian that's the to talk to rudy demonstrating that mr. giuliani was a key player in the corrupt scheme. in the may 23rd oval office meeting to discuss ukraine policy, president trump directed his hand picked three amigos to talk to rudy. in response, ambassador sondland testified, secretary perry, ambassador volker and i worked with rudy at the express direction of the president of the united states. after two explosive white house meetings july 10th on which ambassador sondland explicitly conveyed the president's demand for political investigations to ukraine ukrainian that's the, top ukrainian aide this said, i feel that the key for many things is rudy. what was rudy asking? investigations of two american citizens.

toensing who is familiar with the letter, and he was cooperating with ms., the toesing and mr.a. and this is to press the investigations that the president wanted. the records would also show how the president's political agenda became more important than policies to help america's national security interests. the president's counsel may consistent with the prior attempts to hide evidence assert that attorney/client privilege would cover the documents, but the president's personal attorney/client evidence cannot shield misconduct in office or that of the aides or the lawyer's participation in corrupt schemes. we are not asking for documents reflecting legitimate legal advice. you need documents about their actions to pressure ukraine and to announce the investigation into president trump's political opponent. there is a set of white house documents that relate directly to the president's unlawful decision to withhold $391 million appropriated bipartisan to help ukraine. the witnesses have testified that president trump directly put a hold on the assistance despite his aides say