ms. baldwin? ms. baldwin no. mr. ross? mr. weiner? no. mr. weiner, no. mr. butterfield? mr. butterfield, no. mr. melancon? mr. melancon, no. mr. barrow? mr. barrow no. mr. hill? ms. matsui? ms. matsui, no. ms. castor, no. mr. murphy? mr. murphy no. mr. mcearney no. mr. braley no. mr. welsh? mr. welsh no. mr. bart? mr. barton votes no. mr. hall? mr. upton? mr. upton, no. mr. stearns? mr. stearns no. mr. deal? mr. deal no. mr. whitfield? mr. whitfield no. mr. shimkus? mr. shimkus no. mr. shaddock? mr. shaddock no. mr. blunt? mr. blunt no. mr. williams no. mr. radanovich no. mr. pitts no. miss bono mack no. mr. walden? mr. walden no. mr. terry? mr. terry no. mr. rogers? mr. rogers no. ms. myrick? [ applause ] myrick no. mr. sullivan? mr. sullivan? mr. sullivan no. mr. murphy of pennsylvania? mr. murphy no. mr. burgess? mr. burgess no. mrs. blackburn? mrs. blackburn no? mr. gainbridge no. mr. doany? mr. doany no. mr. boucher? mr. boucher no. mr. murphy? mr. murphy no. mr. rush? mr. rush no. mr. hill? mr. hill no. mr. matheson? mr. matheson no. mr. green? mr. green no. mr. gord

ms. baldwin. ms. baldwin, no. mr. ross. mr. ross no. bl weaner? mr. weaner, no. mr. mathison. mr.erfield. mr. butterfield no. mr. malazon, aye. mr. barrow, mr. barrow aye. mr. hill. mr. hill no. ms. matsui. ms. matsui, no. mrs. christianson. mrs. christianson no. ms. caster. ms. caster, no. mr. sarbain. mr. sarbain no. mr. murphy of connecticut. mr. murphy no. mr. space. mr. space no. mr. mcnurney. mr. mcnurney no. ms. sutton. ms. sutton, no. mr. braillely. mr. braillely no. mr. welsh, mr. welsh no. mr. barton. mr. barton votes aye. mr. hall. mr. hall aye. mr. upton. mr. upton aye. mr. sterns. mr. sterns votes aye. mr. deal. mr. deal aye. mr. whitfield. mr. whitfield aye. mr. shimkus, mr. shimkus aye. mr. shatti gb. mr. blunt. mr. blunt aye. mr. bowyer. mr. bowyer aye. mr. radovonich. mr. hadovonich, aye. mr. walden, mr. walden aye. mr. terry. mr. terry aye. mr. rogers. mr. rogers aye. mrs. myrick, mrs. myrikk aye. mr. murphy of pennsylvania. mr. murphy aye. mr. burgess. mr. bernlgess aye. ms. blackburn. ms. blackburn votes aye. mr. gingrey, aye. mr. skulley. aye. ms. degettz. deg

ms. baldwin. >> no. >> ms. baldwin, no. mr. ross? >> no. >> mr. ross, no. mr. weaner? >> no. >> mr. no. mr. matheson? mr. matheson no. mr. butterfield? >> no. >> mr. butterfield no. mr. melancon? >> no. >> mr. melancon, no. >> mr. barrow? >> aye. >> mr. hill no. ms. matsui? no. mrs. christiansen? no. ms. castor? mr. sarbanes? no. mr. murphy of connecticut? >> no. >> mr. murphy, no. mr. space? >> mr. space votes no. mr. mcnerne sgl no. mr. sutton? >> no. >> ms. sutton, no. >> mr. brale y? >> no. >> mr. braley no. mr. wellch? no. mr. barton? >> aye. >> mr. barton aye. mr. hall? aye. mr. upton, aye. mr. sterns? aye. mr. deal, aye. ms. whitfield, aye. mr. shimkus? aye. mr. shadeg, aye. mr. blunt votes aye. mr. buyer, aye. mr. radanovich, aye. mr. pitts, aye. ms. bono mack, aye. mr. walden, aye. mr. terry? >> aye. >> mr. terry, aye. >> mr. rogers? >> aye. >> mr. rogerser aye. mst myrick? >> aye. >> mr. sullivan? aye mr. murphy, votes aye. mr. burgess, aye. ms. blackburn? aye. mr. gingre sgl. >> aye. >> mr. gingrey, aye. >> mr. scalise? >> aye. >> mr. scalise, aye. >> have all members res

ms. baldwin, michigan ask you, mr. rush, and mr.angle, and i think with the support of many americans who are asking fundamental questions about the way the build we are considering a structured and whether or not there is a better way. this is an amendment that would strike the guts of the bill and replace it with a single-payer option that would, ideally, be less expensive, more simple, and would ultimately cover more people in a way that they understand and know. let me begin by saying that we have tried with some success, but a great deal of confusion, to jerryrigged a health care system on top of the foundation of the private insurance market that if we were going to start from scratch we would never choose. we never choose it because it's expensive. we would never choose it because it's complicated. but we primarily never choose it because the insurance companies role in it is fundamentally contrary to what our role should be as members of congress. they have an incentive, not because they are bad people, but that is because t

ms. baldwin to preside over the committee of the whole. the chair: the house is in the committee of the whole house on the state of the union for consideration of h.r. 3082, which the clerk will repot by title. the clerk: unocalen da number 101, h.r. 3082 a bill making appropriations for military construction, the department of veterans' affairs and related agencies for the fiscal year ending september 30, 2010 and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the first time the gentleman from texas, mr. edwards, and the gentleman from tennessee, mr. wamp, will each control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from texas. mr. edwards: may i ask for order in the house, please. the chair: the gentleman is correct, the house is not in order. the gentleman from texas is recognized. mr. edwards: i yield myself such time as i may consume. the chair: the gentleman is recognized. mr. edwards: madam chair, members, on behalf of america's service men and women, our veterans, and their famili

ms. bald when -- baldwin. the chair will yield to himself. i've been listening to this discussion to see if we could come to terms of this. mr. rogers? the examples mr. dingell pointed out were fda examples. door amendment says that the research could it be used by the federal government to deny or ration care and i think he was pointing out that there are sometimes informational where we ought to do nine carroll when we find it is harmful. so, one way to resolve is to strike the word diman and say be used by the federal government to ration care and then we won't have that problem. is that something you could accept? >> no, sir, it is a philosophical difference of fortunately we've run into because in the cases i gave you and the way that the united kingdom uses it is they use it to deny care. they denied a young lady paps mirrors when she now when we asked for them three different times. so what we are saying is a comparative effectiveness research can be made available and a doctor can take that in the course of his or her practice that we

ms. build win to propre-side -- baldwin to preside over the committee of the whole. the chair: the house is in the committee of the whole house on the state of the union for the consideration of h r. 3326, which the clerk will report by title. the clerk: a bill making appropriations for the department of defense for the fiscal year ending september 30, 2010, and for other purposes. the speaker pro tempore: purr -- the chair: pursuant to the rule, the bill is considered read the first time. the gentleman from pennsylvania, mr. murtha, and the gentleman from florida, mr. young, each will control 30 minutes. the chair recognizes the gentleman from pennsylvania. the gentleman will suspend. the gentleman from pennsylvania is recognized. mr. murtha: madam chair, yesterday, i was out at bethesda, i saw a young fellow that was wounded two years ago. when he was wounded, his internal organs were outside the body for almost 10 days. and he's been putting up with that ever since, until he came back to bethesda and had an operation just recently where they were able to take the