ms. carroll is a good principle. you know how important it is to advocate principle. i just want to say, ms. carol. so i guess what i should do is tell you how this will start. so i was closing in on 60, okay? is over the speed limit. i was closing in on 60 and i'd just gotten fired. i do show in new york. i was here -- thank you. thanks, mom. and i was heartbroken. i really was. i was thinking, maybe i should think about something else. i started thinking and 68, which they do the rest of my life? i went to school to be a teacher and then my life went on. when i had my first pro fight and my mother spent all that money sending me to college to be a teacher. she said are you out of your mind? and then i told her i was going to be a cab driver. she said are you crazy? and then i got taxi and she changed her mind. [laughter] so i was feeling down a little sired for myself. i love the job in new york, but i have this thing about teaching. it's been in my mind a long time. anybody who watches who's the boss knows that tony -- [cheers and applause] thank you very matched. i

ms. lassiter or carroll in ohio, who are now being called to go to quite extraordinary lengths to prove who they are in order to get an idea to go vote. we do not see that there is any justification for these laws, that they're not -- that they are doing much more harm than good. participation and our process is key. our whole history has been an expansion of that participation, particularly over the last 50 years, and these laws run the risk and stand in the way a full voter participation. our problem is not that too many people are registered. our problem is too few people are registering and participating. >> senator grassley? >> i missed mr. carvin's subtleties, but i did hear him say that corporations have not been spending money on this candidate or that candidate. i cannot speak about what they have spent under citizens united, but i have been following corporations and unions, who did they give their money to for a long period of time, and i find unions to be pretty intellectually honest from election to election, giving about 95% of their money to democrats and 5% to republicans. i

ms. latta sir or mr. carrollohio who have been voting for years without incident and now are being required to go to quite -- actually quite extraordinary length to prove who they are in order to get an i.d. to go vote. we do not see there is any justification for these last comment that these laws are doing much more harm than good. participation in our process is key. our whole history has been an expansion of that participation, particularly over the last 50 years and these laws run the risk and stand in the way a full voter participation. our problem is too many people are registered. our problem is too few people are registering and participated to >> thank you. my time is up at senator grassley. >> i missed mr. cardin's subtleties, but i did hear him say that corporations have been spending money on this candidate or that candidate. i can't speak about what they spent under citizens united, but i've been following corporations and unions today get their money money to friends or tax for a long period of tim